- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07332845
Symmetrical Scapula-pelvis Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Superficial Back Line in Chronic Neck Pain With Hamstring Tightness
March 8, 2026 updated by: Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig,DPT, MSAPT, University of Karachi
A research study will be conducted at Physiotherapy department of the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karachi, Pakistan.
Overall 156 patients with 18-40 years old individuals with neck pain will be eligible and they will be included through non-probability, purposive sampling technique.
The written informed consent will be taken from all the patients.
They will be divided through Simple random sampling (computer generated software) method into two groups, 78 in each group.
Group A (experimental group) will receive PNF Symmetrical Scapula-Pelvis Patterns (PNF-SSPP), group B (control group) will receive sub occipital muscle inhibition technique (SMI) and static stretching (SS) of hamstring muscle.
All participants will be assessed using assessment form.
Outcome measures will be Pain, disability, disability, neck range of motions, hamstring tightness, head posture, and levator scapulae index.
An independent assessor blinded to the treatment will assess all the patients for treatment outcome assessment at baseline, after first session and post treatment.
Treatment sessions will be given thrice a week for 6 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
A maximum drop-out rate of 20% is expected.
The Statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) 23 version will be used for data analysing.
The Mean ± SD will be calculated for quantitative variables like age.
The qualitative variables will be shown through calculated frequencies and percentages.
The outcome results of the study (decrease pain intensity, improve disability, improve ROM and improve muscle tightness) taken before, after 1st session and after 18th session will be compared and analyzed.
The repeated measure of ANOVA will be used as the statistical test.
The p-value of 0.05 will be considered as level of significant.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
156
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, PhD
- Phone Number: +923002739920
- Email: ab.dptrm@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Basit Ansari, PhD
- Phone Number: +923222279221
- Email: basitansari@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Sindh
-
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 75300
- Recruiting
- Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
-
Contact:
- Faizan Siddiqui, MSAPT
- Phone Number: +923350352016
- Email: fs.dptrm@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individual with both male and female gender
- Individuals with chronic neck pain (pain for > 3 month) with hamstring tightness
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any history related to spinal surgery
- Previous administration of epidural injections
- Neck pain due to specific pathology
- Patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy
- Traumatic spinal cord injury
- Neck pain associated with progressive neurological deficit or loss of strength
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Symmetrical Scapula-Pelvis Pattern Exercises
This arm will receive PNF Dynamic Reversal of Antagonists using Symmetrical Scapula-Pelvis Patterns
|
Symmetrical scapula-pelvis patterns refer to a balanced, aligned posture and movement of the shoulder blades and pelvis which is often a therapeutic goal in physical rehabilitation with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Treatment
This arm will receive evidence based treatment, the suboccipital muscle inhibition with static stretching of the hamstrings.
|
The Suboccipital Muscle Inhibition technique is a manual therapy method used by practitioners to relieve tension in the suboccipital muscles, which are located at the base of the skull.
Static stretching for hamstrings involves holding a position that creates tension in the back of the thigh for 30 seconds.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in pain intensity with visual analogue scale for pain at Day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of the first treatment session at Day 1.
|
The Visual Analogue Scale is a 10 cm line used to measure pain intensity, where the patient marks a point on the line to indicate their pain level, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "pain as bad as it could possibly be".
A score is obtained by measuring the distance from the "no pain" end to the patient's mark, which can be done in centimeters (0-10) or millimeters (0-100).
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity, and this score helps healthcare providers assess severity, which can be categorized as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10)
|
From enrolment to the end of the first treatment session at Day 1.
|
|
Change in pain intensity with visual analogue scale for pain at 6 weeks
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment session at 6 weeks
|
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm line used to measure pain intensity, where the patient marks a point on the line to indicate their pain level, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "pain as bad as it could possibly be".
A score is obtained by measuring the distance from the "no pain" end to the patient's mark, which can be done in centimeters (0-10) or millimeters (0-100).
Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity, and this score helps healthcare providers assess severity, which can be categorized as mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10).
|
From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment session at 6 weeks
|
|
Change in range of motion with goniometry at Day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of first treatment at Day 1
|
Goniometry measures the change in range of motion of a joint in degrees by using a goniometer to calculate the joint's angle.
The increase in degrees suggests increase in range of motion and decrease suggests decrease in range of motion.
|
From enrolment to the end of first treatment at Day 1
|
|
Change in range of motion with goniometry at 6 weeks
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
Goniometry measures the change in range of motion of a joint in degrees by using a goniometer to calculate the joint's angle.
The increase in degrees suggests increase in range of motion and decrease suggests decrease in range of motion.
|
From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
|
Change in neck disability with Neck Disability Index at day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1.
|
A change in the Neck Disability Index score indicates a change in a patient's self-reported neck disability.
A higher score means greater disability.The NDI is scored from 0 to 50, or 0% to 100%.
A score of 0 indicates no limitation, while a score of 50 represents complete limitation.
|
From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1.
|
|
Change in neck disability with Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
A change in the Neck Disability Index score indicates a change in a patient's self-reported neck disability.
A higher score means greater disability.The NDI is scored from 0 to 50, or 0% to 100%.
A score of 0 indicates no limitation, while a score of 50 represents complete limitation.
|
From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
|
Change in hamstring tightness with Sit and Reach (SR) test at Day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1.
|
A low Sit and Reach test score in centimetre indicates tight hamstrings, while a higher score shows better hamstring flexibility.
When a person with tight hamstrings performs the Sit and Reach test, the muscles pull the pelvis into a posterior tilt, which limits the ability to reach as far and can cause the lower back to round instead of the spine flexing naturally.
As hamstring tightness decreases through stretching, the SR score increases, signifying greater flexibility and improved superficial back line.
|
From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1.
|
|
Change in hamstring tightness with Sit and Reach (SR) test at 6 weeks
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
A low Sit and Reach test score in centimetre indicates tight hamstrings, while a higher score shows better hamstring flexibility.
When a person with tight hamstrings performs the Sit and Reach test, the muscles pull the pelvis into a posterior tilt, which limits the ability to reach as far and can cause the lower back to round instead of the spine flexing naturally.
As hamstring tightness decreases through stretching, the SR score increases, signifying greater flexibility and improved superficial back line.
|
From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in head posture with goniometry at Day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1
|
Goniometry can measure changes in forward head posture by using a goniometer to calculate the craniovertebral angle.
This involves placing the goniometer's base on the C7 spinous process and the moving arm on the tragus of the ear, with a smaller CVA angle indicating a greater degree of forward head posture and vice versa.
Changes are tracked by taking repeated measurements over time to see if the CVA increases (improving posture) or decreases (worsening posture).
|
From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1
|
|
Change in head posture with goniometry at 6 weeks
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks
|
Goniometry can measure changes in forward head posture by using a goniometer to calculate the craniovertebral angle.
This involves placing the goniometer's base on the C7 spinous process and the moving arm on the tragus of the ear, with a smaller CVA angle indicating a greater degree of forward head posture and vice versa.
Changes are tracked by taking repeated measurements over time to see if the CVA increases (improving posture) or decreases (worsening posture).
|
From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks
|
|
Change in levator scapulae index with vernier caliper at Day 1
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1
|
The levator scapulae index is a measurement technique used to assess the relative length of the levator scapulae muscle.
It provides a normalized value by comparing the muscle's length to an individual's total body height, which accounts for variations in size between patients.
A vernier caliper is the tool used for this measurement due to its accuracy.
A normal levator scapulae index range is greater than or equal to 7.44.
Decrease in score suggests decrease in muscle length and increase suggests increase in length.
|
From enrolment to the end of first treatment session at Day 1
|
|
Change in levator scapulae index with vernier caliper at 6 weeks
Time Frame: Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks
|
The levator scapulae index is a measurement technique used to assess the relative length of the levator scapulae muscle.
It provides a normalized value by comparing the muscle's length to an individual's total body height, which accounts for variations in size between patients.
A vernier caliper is the tool used for this measurement due to its accuracy.
A normal levator scapulae index range is greater than or equal to 7.44.
Decrease in score suggests decrease in muscle length and increase suggests increase in length.
|
Time Frame: From enrolment to the end of 18 treatment sessions at 6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Aftab Ahmed Mirza Baig, PhD, University of Karach
- Study Director: Basit Ansari, PhD, University of Karachi
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 26, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 26, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 30, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 30, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
January 12, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 10, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IBC KU-544/2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neck Pain
-
Hochschule OsnabruckNot yet recruitingNeck Pain | Chronic Neck Pain | Neck Disability | Neck Pain Musculoskeletal | Neck Disease
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRecruitingNonspecific Neck Pain | Neck Pain MusculoskeletalTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaNot yet recruitingChronic Neck Pain | Non-specific Neck PainSpain
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNot yet recruitingChronic Neck Pain | Neck Pain Treatment | Neck Pain ChronicHong Kong
-
Benha UniversityCompletedNeck Pain | Mechanical Neck Pain | Pain Threshold | Cervical Pain, Posterior | Neck Pain Musculoskeletal | Extracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyEgypt
-
University of LahoreCompletedNeck Pain | Mechanical Neck Pain | Mobilization | Neck Pain Musculoskeletal | Proprioceptive Neuromuscular FacilitationPakistan
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingNeck Pain | Cervical Pain | Neck Pain, Posterior | Neck Muscle Issue | Cervical Pain, PosteriorTurkey
-
Fatih TekinPamukkale UniversityCompletedChronic Neck Pain | Persistent Neck Pain | Neuroscience ApproachTurkey
-
Hacettepe UniversityNot yet recruitingChronic Neck PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedChronic Neck PainPakistan
Clinical Trials on Symmetrical Scapula-Pelvis Patterns Exercises
-
Hacettepe UniversityUnknown
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedShoulder Impingement SyndromeBrazil
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedSubacromial Impingement SyndromeTurkey
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityCompleted
-
Université Catholique de LouvainEnrolling by invitation