Effects of Rigid Taping in Acromioclavicular Joint Degeneration (ACJTaping)

December 30, 2025 updated by: Irem Duzgun, Hacettepe University

The Effect of Rigid Taping on Pain and Function in Individuals With Acromioclavicular Joint

This study will examine whether rigid taping applied to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint can reduce shoulder pain and improve shoulder function in people with AC joint degeneration. Participants with shoulder pain and a confirmed diagnosis of AC joint degeneration will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) rigid taping plus a standardized exercise program or (2) the same exercise program without taping. The program will last 4 weeks, with weekly supervised visits. Pain, shoulder motion, and shoulder function will be assessed at baseline, after the first session (acute effect), at the end of treatment (Week 4), and at a 3-month follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints and can affect daily activities, work, and sports participation. Among the potential sources of shoulder pain, the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a distinct pain generator that can often be identified through a targeted clinical examination. Diagnosis is typically based on a detailed history combined with physical tests designed to provoke AC joint symptoms, such as scarf maneuvers and localized palpation.

The AC joint is a synovial articulation between the distal clavicle and the acromion of the scapula. Although its motion is relatively limited, it plays an important role in load transfer across the shoulder girdle, particularly during arm elevation and overhead activities. AC joint symptoms may arise through different mechanisms, including degenerative changes over time, traumatic events, or inflammatory processes. Degenerative AC joint disease may coexist with other shoulder conditions, and structural changes around the joint can contribute to pain by increasing mechanical stress and altering the subacromial environment. As a result, individuals may experience pain with overhead movements, cross-body motions, lifting, pushing, or during sport-specific tasks.

Management of AC joint degeneration typically begins with conservative care. Common non-surgical strategies include physiotherapy, activity modification, temporary unloading or immobilization when needed, and symptom-directed medical management. Rehabilitation approaches generally focus on optimizing posture, improving scapular control, enhancing periscapular strength and endurance, restoring flexibility of the posterior shoulder structures, and progressively reintroducing functional loading while minimizing symptom provocation.

Taping techniques are frequently used in shoulder rehabilitation as an adjunct to exercise-based care. In clinical practice, rigid and elastic taping methods are applied with the intention of modifying joint alignment and mechanical loading, limiting painful movement patterns, and supporting more efficient scapulothoracic and glenohumeral mechanics during activity. Rigid taping, in particular, is often considered when a more structured mechanical effect is desired. While taping has been investigated in various shoulder pain presentations, existing evidence has largely focused on subacromial pain conditions and scapular kinematics rather than AC joint degeneration specifically. Consequently, there remains uncertainty about whether rigid taping provides additional clinical benefit for individuals whose primary pain source is degenerative change at the AC joint.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of rigid AC joint taping on shoulder pain, pain-free shoulder range of motion, and shoulder function in individuals with shoulder pain associated with AC joint degeneration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ankara
      • Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Recruiting
        • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sports Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of acromioclavicular (AC) joint degeneration confirmed by clinical examination and imaging (X-ray, ultrasound, or MRI).
  • Shoulder pain duration of at least 4 weeks.
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Willingness to refrain from any additional treatments outside the study protocol during the study period (e.g., medication changes, injections, or physiotherapy elsewhere) and to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or previous diagnosis/history of acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation.
  • Diagnosis of frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).
  • History of acute trauma or fracture involving the shoulder girdle (e.g., clavicle fracture, shoulder dislocation).
  • History of shoulder surgery.
  • Systemic inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic arthropathies.
  • Skin conditions preventing taping (e.g., rash, open wound, or known tape allergy).
  • Neuromuscular disease or neurological disorders affecting shoulder function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Rigid Taping + Exercise
Participants will receive rigid acromioclavicular joint taping once weekly for 4 weeks in addition to a standardized shoulder exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist.
Rigid taping will be applied to the acromioclavicular joint using a standardized technique aiming to posteriorize the acromion and inferiorize the clavicle. Taping will be performed once weekly for 4
A standardized shoulder exercise program focusing on soft tissue flexibility, scapular stabilization, and rotator cuff activation will be applied once weekly for 4 weeks.
Active Comparator: Exercise Only
Participants will receive a standardized shoulder exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist without any taping application.
A standardized shoulder exercise program focusing on soft tissue flexibility, scapular stabilization, and rotator cuff activation will be applied once weekly for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), immediately after the first session (acute effect), Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up
Pain intensity will be assessed at rest and during activity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Baseline (Week 0), immediately after the first session (acute effect), Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up
Shoulder Range of Motion
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), immediately after the first session (acute effect), Week 2, Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up
Shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation) will be assessed using a goniometer by recording active range of motion until pain onset, active range of motion despite pain, and passive end-range of motion.
Baseline (Week 0), immediately after the first session (acute effect), Week 2, Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder Function
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up
Shoulder function will be evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), which assesses pain and functional activities of daily living.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 4 (end of intervention), and Month 3 follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared because specific data-sharing agreements and governance procedures have not been established.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on Rigid Taping

Subscribe