Prediction Model for MINS After Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

June 12, 2026 updated by: Zhifeng Gao, Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital

Development of an Interpretable Prediction Model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

This multi-center, prospective observational study aims to develop and validate an interpretable prediction model for Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery. The study adopts a nested modeling strategy, starting with baseline risk factors (e.g., RCRI) and stepwise incorporating hepatic inflow occlusion strategies (specifically comparing SPVO vs. Pringle maneuver) and routine intraoperative biomarkers. The model's performance will be evaluated using AUC, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), followed by interpretability analysis using SHAP values and external validation in an independent cohort.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study Design and Methodology: The study consists of four consecutive phases aimed at constructing a robust and interpretable prediction model for MINS.

  1. Multi-center Cohort Standardization: Based on clinical data from multiple participating centers, the investigators will establish a standardized structural dataset. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria will be applied. The process involves rigorous data cleaning and normalization to harmonize demographics, surgical operation details, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters across different centers, laying the foundation for model construction.
  2. Nested Modeling and Performance Evaluation: A nested modeling strategy will be employed to assess the incremental predictive value of specific surgical and biological variables:

    Model A (Baseline): Constructed using standard baseline variables such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI).

    Model B (+Surgical Technique): Incorporates hepatic inflow occlusion strategies, specifically comparing SPVO (Selective Pringle Vascular Occlusion) vs. Pringle maneuver, along with occlusion duration and frequency.

    Model C (Full Model): Further incorporates MINS-related biomarkers.

    Model performance will be comprehensively evaluated using:

    Discrimination: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC).

    Calibration: Calibration plots.

    Clinical Utility: Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to assess the improvement in risk stratification and clinical net benefit after adding new variables.

  3. Model Interpretability Analysis: To enhance the transparency of the model ("White-box" approach), SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values or similar methods will be utilized. This will quantify and visualize the specific contribution (weight) of key variables, such as SPVO usage, to the individual risk prediction, aligning the statistical results with clinical medical reasoning.
  4. External Validation: The final model will undergo validation using an independent external clinical cohort. This step aims to test the stability and generalizability of the model across different center data, defining its applicable scope in real-world clinical scenarios.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University International Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine,Tsinghua University
        • Contact:
      • Chongqing, China
      • Qingdao, China
        • Recruiting
        • Qingdao West Coast New Area People's Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Shandong, China
        • Recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University
        • Contact:
      • Zhuhai, China
        • Recruiting
        • Zhuhai People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

1800

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Adults (18-85 yr, ASA physical status II-III) undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery were enrolled. Major surgery was defined as duration ≥ 3 h involving hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) or biliary reconstruction necessitating ICU admission. Eligibility required paired perioperative high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) data and comprehensive documentation of surgical covariates, including surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open), resection nature (anatomic vs. non-anatomic), number of resected segments, tumor characteristics (size and location), and presence of cirrhosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) preoperative acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/ (min · 1.73 m2); (2) undocumented inflow occlusion strategy; or (3) non-imputable missing covariates.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Training set
Cases in this subset are used for model training, testing and internal validation
Patients undergo standard major hepatobiliary surgery (e.g., hepatectomy). The specific surgical strategy, including the method of hepatic inflow occlusion (e.g., Pringle maneuver or SPVO), is determined by the attending surgeon based on routine clinical practice and patient condition, not by the study protocol.
External validation set
This part is for external validation of predictive models.
Patients undergo standard major hepatobiliary surgery (e.g., hepatectomy). The specific surgical strategy, including the method of hepatic inflow occlusion (e.g., Pringle maneuver or SPVO), is determined by the attending surgeon based on routine clinical practice and patient condition, not by the study protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of predictive model
Time Frame: Within 3 days after surgery
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery
Within 3 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Model calibration
Time Frame: Within 3 days after surgery
assessed by calibration curve / Hosmer-Lemeshow test
Within 3 days after surgery
Decision curve analysis (DCA)-derived clinical net benefit
Time Frame: Within 3 days after surgery
Within 3 days after surgery
Model stability and generalizability in the external validation cohort
Time Frame: Within 3 days after surgeries
Within 3 days after surgeries
Contribution weight of key variables (SPVO, biomarkers) analyzed via SHAP
Time Frame: Within 3 days after surgeires
Within 3 days after surgeires

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhifeng Gao, MD, Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Complications

Clinical Trials on Major Hepatobiliary Surgery

3
Subscribe