AtWork: The Relation Between Cognitive Functioning, Common Mental Disorders and Work Functioning (AtWork)

Depression and anxiety affects levels of function across different levels like work, increasing levels of sick leave and as well as cognitive functioning. In the current study patients at risk of sick leave with depression and anxiety receive metacognitive therapy and work focus in an ordinary outpatient clinic. Impaired cognitive functioning may also be of importance in the return to work process and degree of sick leave. It is important to get a better understanding of how cognitive functioning is related to sick leave and if it predicts return to work, and if cognitive functioning is changed due to psychological treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The study is a naturalistic study exploring cognitive functioning of patients with common mental disorders (CMD) treated with metacognitive therapy and work focused interventions, and changes over time.

Sick leave is common for patients with CMD, also after having completed treatment for CMD. Why patients remain on sick leave after having completed treatment is underexplored. Potential reasons may be that work and sick leave is not addressed during therapy, there could be issues related to the work place, also there may be characteristics related to the patients functioning that is underexplored. In the latter context, little knowledge regarding the relations between cognitive functioning, symptoms of CMD and work functioning. Previous studies have investigated neuropsychological functions in relation to work related stress and stress-related exhaustion, and found worse performance on cognitive tasks compared to healthy controls. Although stress-related exhaustion can be considered a phenomenon related to CMD, there are no studies the investigators are aware of that investigate neuropsychological predictors specifically related to CMD and work functioning. A review from 2022 specifically aimed to identify neuropsychological predictors of vocational rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with MDD specifically, and found no studies. This clearly demonstrates a knowledge gap that this project would fill. E.g., lower cognitive functioning after successful treatment of CMD is related to increased risk of additional sick leave. With this in mind, increasing our knowledge of these variables can help clinicians identify patients at risk for additional sick leave, even after successful treatment. A previous study at the same clinic has identified three subgroups in a sample of patients with CMD at risk of sick leave. The first group was never on sick leave. The second group returned to work after sick leave during or shortly after treatment. In the third group half of the patients remained on sick leave or disability. To better understand characteristics of such subgroups it is relevant to explore standard clinical information given in the patient's journal. This project is mainly, but not exclusively a PhD-project. The time schedule for the project will go beyond the time for the PhD, especially long-time follow-up.

The main aims of the project are the following:

To explore how descriptive variables, CMD symptoms, and cognitive functioning are associated with work functioning (sick leave or risk for sick leave) before treatment. And what is the interplay between symptoms, cognitive profiles and sick leave.

To explore whether cognitive functioning can predict outcomes of both symptoms of CMD and degree of sick leave, and if cognitive functioning changes through MCT and work focused interventions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Diakonhjemmet Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred with depression and/or anxiety disorders at risk of sick leave.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety,
  • at risk of sick leave

Exclusion Criteria:

  • personality disorders cluster A or B,
  • ongoing substance abuse,
  • symptoms of psychosis,
  • acute suicidality,
  • serious somatic disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients referred with depression and/or anxiety and at risk of sick leave

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up
Measure of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) range 0-27 higher scores indicate higher degree of depressive symptoms
Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up
Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) range 0-21 higher scores indicating higher degree of anxiety symptoms
Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up
Changes in sick leave
Time Frame: Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up
Sick leave is collected from national register data measured in number of days of sick leave.
Measured at pre-treatment and at therapy completion, an average of 10 weekly sessions, and at 6, 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Due to ethical considerations as this is a clinical study that includes patients with depression and/or anxiety at risk of sick leave, information will not be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Subscribe