A Pilot Study on Reverse Aging (The REVERSE Study)

January 12, 2026 updated by: Steve Amoils, The Christ Hospital

Aging can be defined as a time-dependent functional decline in physiological function, which may increase the vulnerability to diseases and eventually death. The question is whether aging is a normal process, or exists as an "uber-illness?" Work done by Dr Sinclair at Harvard suggests the latter. Dr. Sinclair feels people should be able to age-in-place, or even reverse age. Aging is arguably the single biggest risk factor for all acquired and chronic diseases. Delaying the aging rate by 7 years would cut the incidence of chronic disease in half! Up until know the effects of anti-aging would need longitudinal studies until death.

Now, with the advent of a 3rd generation OMIC Age clock, there is a way to assess if an intervention is changing the rate of aging and other methylation patterns associated with aging.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45236
        • AIM for Wellbeing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be healthy and of any sex, any ethnicity, and any age from 50 to 80
  • "Healthy" subjects will be defined as a real-world cohort of individuals likely to utilize such an intervention
  • May be on other medications if they do not conflict with rapamycin.
  • All medical conditions need to be stable and well controlled.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe illnesses, for which rapamycin may cause harm. This would not be limited to but include active neoplastic or auto-immune disease. If patients have a previous history of cancer or auto-immune disease, the risks and benefits and possible adverse reactions will be discussed at time of consent
  • History of organ transplant
  • Any unstable medical condition that would interfere with the study
  • Hepatic impairment. Note: Patients with elevated liver enzymes and low albumin, will be further screened for hepatic impairment. Elevated liver enzymes < 2x upper limit of normal will not be considered hepatic impairment.
  • Renal impairment, indicated by a serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL
  • Anemia indicated by a hemoglobin < 12 g/dL
  • Platelets < 80,000/cumm,
  • ANC < 1,000 / cumm
  • Total WBC < 3,000/cumm
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding or woman of childbearing potential with inadequate contraception
  • Unstable mental illness
  • A condition where rapamycin may interfere deleteriously with a medication that is taken by a potential subject
  • Currently prescribed with high dose CYP3A4 pathway medications such as verapamil > 240 mg; simvastatin >40 mg, lovastatin > 40 mg or atorvastatin > 40 mg daily. Poor GI motility as demonstrated by delayed gastric emptying on a radionucleotide isotope scan.
  • Intercurrent severe infection at initiation of study drug
  • Any and all other reasons that the investigator may determine that the participant is not suitable for study enrollment.
  • History of or active eating disorders as deemed by PI.
  • BMI lower than 18.5
  • Any medication that may dangerously lower glucose while on the FMD. This will include insulin, sulfonylureas (glyburide; glipizide); Thiazolidenediones ( eg piogltazone; rosiglitazone); GLP1 drugs (semaglutide; tirzepatide);; DPP-4 inhibitors (eg sitagliptin; saxagliptin); Alpha -glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose; miglitol). Patients on SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin; canagliflozin) and Metformin (glucophage) may be included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rapamycin Only
12 participants: 10 mg initial bolus dose of rapamycin followed by a weekly 6 mg rapamycin, enrolling 6 men, 6 women, with 6 ( 3 M, 3 F) who are 50-65 years; 6 ( 3 M, 3 F) who are >65 years
10 mg initial bolus dose of rapamycin followed by a weekly 6 mg rapamycin
Active Comparator: Prolon Diet Only
12 participants: 6 men, 6 women, with 6 (3 M, 3 F) who are 50-65 years; 6 who are >65 years Prolon® 5-day diet at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 months;
Prolon 5-day diet at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,and 5 months
Experimental: Rapamycin and Prolon Diet
24 participants: 10 mg initial bolus dose of rapamycin followed by a weekly 6 mg rapamycin along with Prolon 5-day diet at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,and 5 months. : 12 men, 12 women, 12 ( 6 M, 6 F) who are 50-65 years; 12 ( 6 M, 6 F) who are >65 years.
10 mg initial bolus dose of rapamycin followed by a weekly 6 mg rapamycin
Prolon 5-day diet at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,and 5 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Biological Age from Baseline to End of Study based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the gradated effects of mTOR inhibition on a new OMIC methylation test that evaluates biological (vs chronological) age over a six-month period.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effects of AMPK (AMP Kinase inhibition) on aging. Change in OMICm methylation from baseline to Week 24 based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
. This will duplicate studies already done utilizing a 5 day Fasting Mimicking Diet (FMD) (Prolon) on aging. The FMD diet will be administered 6 times - at monthly intervals. Change in OMICm methylation from baseline to Week 24
24 weeks
Effect of weekly low-dose rapamycin on aging based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in OMICm methylation from baseline to Week 24
24 weeks
Lowering of insulin resistance based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
To evaluate the combined effects of AMPK and low-dose weekly rapamycin, at lowering insulin resistance, and thereby PI3K (PI3 kinase).
24 weeks
Effects on insulin resistance
Time Frame: 24 weeks
To stratify outcomes of the prior three outcomes based on insulin resistance. This will be monitored using a Quest Lab Insulin Resistance panel to determine if insulin resistance is a confounding variable from any of the above. Variability of results in a, b, or c based on high, low or moderate insulin resistance.
24 weeks
Does reversal of age improve cognition based on the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Changes in the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory from baseline to week 24. Scores range from 20-140, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
24 weeks
Patterns based on Age based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
To see if any pattern exists within age group categories. (50-65; older than age 65). Change in OMICm methylation results from baseline to Week 24 by two sub populations: ages 50-65 and ages older than age 65
24 weeks
Sex Difference based on Tru Diagnostic Tru Age OMICm Age test results.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Change in OMICm methylation from baseline to Week 24 by male vs female
24 weeks
Safety and tolerability of rapamycin and Prolon
Time Frame: 28 weeks
Review of adverse reactions from baseline to Week 28
28 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Rapamycin (Tablets)

Subscribe