Conventional Versus High-Voltage Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Pudendal Nerve

January 21, 2026 updated by: Şükriye Dadalı, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Comparing Conventional and High-Voltage Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Applied to the Pudendal Nerve in the Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluating two types of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment for patients with pudendal neuralgia. Pudendal neuralgia is a chronic neuropathic pain affecting the perineum and pelvic area, often causing significant discomfort and reduced quality of life.

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either conventional PRF or high-voltage long-duration PRF applied to the pudendal nerve. The study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness, pain relief, and safety of the two treatment approaches. Participants will be monitored for pain improvement, functional outcomes, and any treatment-related side effects.

The study follows standard clinical procedures and all treatments are performed under sterile conditions with proper monitoring to ensure patient safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of conventional pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) versus high-voltage long-duration PRF applied to the pudendal nerve in patients with pudendal neuralgia.

Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups. Conventional PRF will be applied at 42°C for 360 seconds, while high-voltage long-duration PRF will be applied at 42°C for up to 900 seconds, with voltage titrated from 40V to a patient-tolerated maximum of 90V. All procedures are performed under sterile conditions in an operating room with patient monitoring (blood pressure, pulse, ECG, and oxygen saturation).

Patients will be assessed for pain intensity, functional improvement, and adverse effects at scheduled follow-up visits. Bilateral symptoms will be treated sequentially if present. The study adheres to standard clinical safety procedures and no additional risk beyond routine clinical care is anticipated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia according to the Nantes diagnostic criteria
  • Followed at the Algology (Pain Medicine) outpatient clinic
  • Chronic pudendal neuralgia refractory to conservative treatment or intolerance to conservative therapies
  • Not using neuropathic pain medications, or on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up visits
  • Ability to understand the study information and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Presence of pelvic organic pathologies that may cause pudendal pain
  • Pain limited only to the coccygeal, gluteal, or lower abdominal regions
  • Patients with purely paroxysmal pain, isolated pruritus, or imaging findings that fully explain symptoms
  • History of malignancy or autoimmune disease
  • Previous surgery that may have altered the anatomy of the pudendal nerve region
  • Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or implanted electrical device
  • Use of anticoagulant therapy or presence of uncorrectable coagulation disorders
  • Active systemic infection or infection at the injection site
  • Known hypersensitivity to metals
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1 - Conventional PRF
Conventional Pulsed Radiofrequency Description: Conventional PRF applied to the pudendal nerve at 42°C for 360 seconds, 2 Hz, 20 ms pulse width. Standard clinical procedure under sterile conditions.
Conventional pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is applied to the pudendal nerve at 42°C for 360 seconds, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and pulse width of 20 ms. The procedure is performed under sterile conditions in the operating room with patient monitoring (blood pressure, pulse, ECG, oxygen saturation). Patients are positioned prone, the target site is sterilized, and the PRF needle is placed under fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral symptoms are treated sequentially if present.
Experimental: Arm 2 - High-Voltage Long-Duration PRF
High-Voltage Long-Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Description: High-voltage, long-duration PRF applied to the pudendal nerve at 42°C for 900 seconds, voltage titrated from 40V to patient-tolerated maximum of 90V. Procedure performed under sterile conditions.
High-voltage long-duration pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is applied to the pudendal nerve at 42°C for 900 seconds, with a pulse frequency of 2 Hz and pulse width of 20 ms. The voltage is titrated from 40V to a patient-tolerated maximum of 90V. The procedure is performed under sterile conditions in the operating room with patient monitoring (blood pressure, pulse, ECG, oxygen saturation). Patients are positioned prone, the target site is sterilized, and the PRF needle is placed under fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral symptoms are treated sequentially if present.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Intensity Assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), which ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The primary outcome is the change in NRS score from baseline to 6 months after treatment. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. NRS scores will also be recorded at 1 and 3 months to allow longitudinal comparison.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Patient satisfaction with treatment will be assessed using a 5-point satisfaction scale ranging from 0 (not satisfied at all) to 4 (very satisfied).
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Quality of Life Assessed by Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire.
Baseline and 6 months
Adverse Events and Complications
Time Frame: From intervention to 6 months
All procedure-related adverse events and complications will be recorded throughout the study period.
From intervention to 6 months
Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months
Patient-reported global improvement will be assessed using the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale, a Likert-type scale ranging from -5 to +5, where negative values indicate worsening, 0 indicates no change, and positive values indicate improvement. Higher scores indicate a better perceived outcome.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data are not shared due to institutional and legal restrictions on patient data protection.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pudendal Neuralgia

Clinical Trials on Intervention Type * Select the type of intervention. Procedure / Surgery Intervention Name * Enter a brief, descriptive name for the intervention. Use a non-proprietary (generic) name, if available

Subscribe