DELphi Procedure for Developing Recommendations for the Implementation of Wearable Devices and Polygenic Risk Scores (DEL-DIP)

DEL-DIP: DELphi Procedure for Developing Recommendations for the Implementation of Wearable Devices and Polygenic Risk Scores

DEL-DIP is a prospective observational study employing a Delphi methodology (at least two online rounds) to elicit and consolidate the views of an expert panel within the INNOPREV project. The study aims to develop operational recommendations to support the coordinated implementation of Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) and wearable devices in cardiovascular prevention. Specifically, it addresses the following research question: which recommendations and requirements-genomic, digital, and clinical/organizational-are necessary to integrate PRS and wearable technologies into routine practice and healthcare services, and for which of these elements do experts achieve consensus (defined as a Content Validity Index, CVI, > 79%)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The DEL-DIP project aims to develop operational recommendations to support the coordinated implementation of Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) and wearable devices within cardiovascular prevention pathways, where the integration of genomics and digital health may enhance risk stratification and enable continuous monitoring.

The study adopts a Delphi methodology comprising anonymous, web-based rounds in which an expert panel rates its level of agreement with a series of proposed recommendations. Following each round, responses are aggregated and summarized, and the items are re-circulated to allow participants to reconsider and refine their judgments in light of group feedback, thereby facilitating iterative convergence toward consensus.

Data are collected via Microsoft Forms and centralized for analysis. Safeguards are implemented to ensure data security, anonymity, and privacy, and electronic informed consent is obtained prior to questionnaire access.

For each item, the Content Validity Index (CVI) is calculated as the proportion of experts assigning a rating of 4 or 5. A CVI > 79% indicates consensus and supports item inclusion; CVI values between 70% and 79% indicate partial agreement and the need for item revision and/or additional Delphi rounds; values < 70% suggest item exclusion.

The final output will consist of a set of recommendations organized by domain (genomic, digital, and clinical/organizational), together with an assessment of response stability across successive rounds (i.e., changes in CVI), to inform implementation within healthcare services.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • RM
      • Roma, RM, Italy, 00168
        • Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A panel of at least 10 experts will be recruited from professionals involved in the INNOPREV project (internal and/or external members) with expertise in cardiology, personalized medicine, and/or digital health. Participation will be by email invitation and will require acceptance of the informed consent form (exclusion criterion: failure to provide informed consent)

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Experts in cardiology
  • Experts in personalized medicine
  • Experts in digital health.

Exclusion criteria

- Failure to provide informed consent (i.e., non-acceptance of the informed consent form)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
INNOPREV expert panel
Professionals involved in the INNOPREV project with expertise in cardiology, personalized medicine, and/or digital health will be invited to participate. Enrollment will occur by invitation only, contingent upon provision of electronic informed consent. A panel of at least 10 experts is planned

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of expert-panel consensus on recommendations for the implementation of PRS and wearable devices, as assessed by the Content Validity Index (CVI)
Time Frame: At the end of the Delphi process (up to 4 months)
Achievement of consensus among the expert panel on the proposed recommendations. Consensus will be defined, for each item, as a Content Validity Index (CVI) > 79%, where the CVI represents the proportion of experts assigning a rating of 4 or 5
At the end of the Delphi process (up to 4 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of recommendations with partial agreement (CVI 70-79%)
Time Frame: After each Delphi round, through completion of the process (up to 4 months)
Identification of items/recommendations with a Content Validity Index (CVI) between 70% and 79%, indicating the need for item revision and/or additional Delphi rounds
After each Delphi round, through completion of the process (up to 4 months)
Development of the final set of recommendations, structured by domain (genomic, digital, and clinical/organizational)
Time Frame: At completion of the Delphi process (up to 4 months)
Production of the final set of recommendations, organized by domain (genomic, digital, and clinical/organizational)
At completion of the Delphi process (up to 4 months)
Stability of responses across successive rounds (assessment of changes in CVI)
Time Frame: Between successive Delphi rounds, until completion of the process (up to 4 months)
Assessment of response stability by comparing, for each item, changes in the CVI across successive Delphi rounds
Between successive Delphi rounds, until completion of the process (up to 4 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: STEFANIA BOCCIA, PHD, Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Prevention

Subscribe