Effectiveness of a Group Lifestyle Balance Class in a Military Population

July 13, 2020 updated by: Nicole Armitage, David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center
With this study researchers will evaluate the effects of the GLB intervention on weight loss, chronic disease indicators and self-perceived function and well-being in an active duty population. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the GLB program [compared with two currently available programs, the Fitness Improvement Program (FIP) and the Better Body Better Life (BBBL) program], on the following health indicators: improvement of individual physical fitness as measured by change in abdominal circumference, weight and physical activity; decrease in risk associated with chronic disease as measured by changes in lipid and HbA1c levels; and improvement in self-perceived function and well-being as measured by the RAND 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND SF- 36). In addition, the researchers seek to obtain feedback about the programs from the participants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many active duty personnel struggle with weight gain and becoming overweight during the course of their active duty service. This can lead to difficulty in maintaining fitness standards and limit their ability to fully function in performing their mission. In addition, this may lead to increased risk for chronic disease development. Few published studies exist that evaluate interventions aimed at weight loss and chronic disease prevention in the active duty population. The Group Lifestyle Balance (GLB) program has been shown to be effective in facilitating weight loss and reducing chronic disease risk in civilian populations. However, the effectiveness of this class in preventing chronic illnesses, facilitating weight loss, increasing physical activity and promoting perceptions of improved functioning and well-being has not been studied in active duty populations. The purpose of this study will be to examine the effectiveness of the GLB program compared with the currently available Fitness Improvement Program (FIP) and Better Body Better Life (BBBL) on the following health indicators: individual physical fitness as measured by change in weight, abdominal circumference and minutes engaged in physical activity; changes in risk associated with chronic disease as measured by changes in lipid and HbA1c levels; and changes in self-perception of function and well-being as measured by the RAND SF-36 questionnaire.

This will be a quantitative randomized control intervention study to determine the effects of a GLB class on physical indicators of fitness, disease risk and overall perception of functional health and well-being in an active duty population, and to compare outcomes with the FIP intervention (care as usual) and newly implemented BBBL intervention currently offered to Airmen. This study will be conducted at David Grant Medical Center (DGMC), Travis AFB, California.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • An active duty member of the USAF

    • Have at least one of the following conditions:

      • An abdominal circumference over 35 inches for men or 31.5 inches for women
      • BMI over 25 kg/m2
    • Are willing to commit to weekly 1 hour classes for 12 weeks and monthly 1 hour classes for an additional 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

    • Participants who are within 8 months of a Permanent Change of Station or deployment
    • Anyone who has been restricted from participating in moderate activity equivalent to a brisk walk
    • Taking lipid-lowering or glucose-lowering medication
    • Anyone who for medical reasons cannot have a calorie-restricted diet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group Lifestyle Balance
Participants receive the Group Lifestyle Balance intervention as per the standard curriculum
The content of the GLB program consists of educating participants about the association between high calorie and fat intake with excessive weight, how to determine the fat and calorie content of foods they eat, and how to make changes in their diet to reduce the fat and calorie content. Participants are also given information about increasing activity in their daily routines. In addition, they are given information about negative behaviors that lead to overeating and decreased activity and are taught ways to develop positive behaviors to facilitate weight loss and increased activity. GLB instructors function as lifestyle coaches for class participants. They provide individual feedback and encouragement on documented eating and activity habits. The instructors make themselves available to be contacted by participants outside of class to address participant concerns and issues as needed
Other Names:
  • GLB
Active Comparator: Better Body Better Life
Participants receive the Better Body Better Life intervention as per the standard curriculum
The BBBL program is an Air Force weight management program.). It was created based on the Adult Learning Model and consists of 5 independent modules that are taught in-person to groups of up to 15-20 individuals. Each module is done in a classroom and is 2 hours long. One module per week is offered. Individuals can attend the modules in any order but they are required to complete a pre-survey and 3-day food record prior to attending their first class
Other Names:
  • BBBL
Active Comparator: Fitness Improvement Program
Participants take the Fitness Improvement Program on-line
The FIP is a standardized course that can be accessed on-line through the Advanced Distributed Learning Service (ADLS) and takes approximately 90 minutes to view all of the course material. The on-line FIP can be done all in one sitting or in segments. There is no restriction on the frequency with which the FIP is viewed however, because it is accessed through ADLS, it may be difficult to view at a non-military computer. The FIP consists of an introduction, three core components (nutrition, physical training, and spiritual well-being), and a summary. Each section has a short video presentation. The core components have short quizzes at the end to assess knowledge and the training asks participants to set goals. Participants are then responsible for using the information for their own self-directed program.
Other Names:
  • BE WELL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight
Time Frame: 6 months
measured on a calibrated human weight scale
6 months
Abdominal Circumference
Time Frame: measured at 6 months
measurement taken as per Air Force Instruction for the Fitness Assessment
measured at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Well-being
Time Frame: 6 months
as measured by the Rand SF 36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater well-being or function.
6 months
Lipids
Time Frame: 6 months
serum levels obtained through venipuncture
6 months
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
As measured by minutes per week of physical activity
6 months
HbA1C
Time Frame: 6 months
serum levels obtained through venipuncture
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 11, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDG20150017H

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Prevention

Clinical Trials on Group Lifestyle Balance

3
Subscribe