Comparing the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 for Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring to a Hospital-Grade Monitor (GARMIN)

February 20, 2026 updated by: David Ruttens, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
This clinical trial evaluates the accuracy of the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 smartwatch in measuring vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO₂) compared to the clinically validated Philips IntelliVue X2. The study aims to determine whether the consumer-grade smartwatch can provide reliable data for remote patient monitoring, early hospital discharge, and chronic disease management, offering a more accessible and affordable alternative to MDR-certified devices.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Wearable technology has rapidly evolved from fitness tracking tools to potential clinical-grade devices capable of non-invasive monitoring of vital signs. Among these, smartwatches equipped with optical sensors and accelerometers now offer continuous measurements of parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). The Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 represent a new generation of commercially available smartwatches that provide vital sign monitoring outside of controlled medical environments.

Despite their growing popularity and technological advancements, the clinical validity of smartwatches remains unknown. Applying for medical device regulation (MDR) certification is a long and expensive process, something not all companies can or want to invest in. Besides, the devices that are MDR certified are often very expensive, something not possible to use in an average patient population without extensive funding. For the use of (non-MDR certified) smartwatches into clinical workflows or remote patient monitoring systems, these devices must demonstrate accuracy and reliability comparable to gold-standard hospital-grade monitors.

The Philips IntelliVue X2 is a widely used and clinically validated multi-parameter patient monitoring system employed in acute care setting. It provides high-fidelity, real-time monitoring of vital signs and serves as an appropriate benchmark for evaluating the performance of customer-grade devices.

Comparing measurements obtained with the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 against the IntelliVue X2 is essential to determine whether the smartwatch can serve as a reliable tool for continuous vital sign tracking in real-world clinical scenarios. This is particularly relevant for use cases such as early hospital discharge, remote patient monitoring and chronic disease management where accessibility, affordability, convenience and user compliance are critical.

This clinical trial seeks to assess the agreement and accuracy of the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 in measuring key physiological parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and SpO2 compared to the Philips Intellivue X2 in a diverse patient population. Demonstrating clinical equivalence or acceptable accuracy margins would support the potential use of the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 in remote or supplemental monitoring roles within modern (hybrid) healthcare systems.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Recruiting
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Ruttens, MD, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide signed and dated informed consent
  • Adults older than 18 years of age
  • Speak and understand the Dutch language
  • Hospitalized for at least another 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life expectancy is less than 30 days
  • Patient is isolated due to infection control

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients admitted to the pulmonology ward
Patients admitted to the pulmonology ward of Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Upon completion of the monitoring period, participants will be asked to complete the Smartwatch Rating Scale (SRS) questionnaire
Each participant will be continuously monitored for a minimum of one full night and up to a maximum of 24 hours using both a hospital-grade monitor (Philips IntelliVue X2) and a Garmin Venu 3 or Garmin Venu 4 smartwatch.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean absolute difference between the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and a hospital-grade monitor in measuring heart rate up to 24 hours.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
For heart rate, the mean absolute difference will be calulated between the measurements performed with the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and the measurements performed with the Philips Intellivue X2
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
Mean absolute difference between the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and a hospital-grade monitor in measuring respiratory rate up to 24 hours.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
For respiratory rate, the mean absolute difference will be calculated between the measurements performed with the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and the measurements performed with the Philips IntelliVue X2
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
Mean absolute difference between the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and a hospital-grade monitor in measuring peripheral oxygen saturation up to 24 hours.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
For peripheral oxygen satuation (SpO2), the mean absolute difference will be calculated between the measurements performed with the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 and the measurements performed with the Philips IntelliVue X2.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of artefacts during measurements performed when the participant is awake vs measurements performed when the participant is asleep (expressed in % measurements)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
Measurements reported as a '0' due to the inability of the device to perform a correct measurement will be labeled as false.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
User experience of the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 as measured by the Smartwatch Rating Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
User experience of the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 as measured by the Smartwatch Rating Scale
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
Time to detection of a sudden drop in SpO2 or clinical deterioration measured by the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 vs a hospital-grade monitor
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours
In the event of patient deterioration, changes may be reflected in SpO2 levels. This endpoint will evaluate the time taken by the Garmin Venu 3 / Garmin Venu 4 compared to a hospital-grade monitor to detect such changes.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Z-2025082
  • CIV-25-07-053536 (Other Identifier: EUDAMED)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Raw data regarding the vital parameter measurements with other researchers

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smartwatch rating scale questionnaire

Subscribe