- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07364097
A Study of Silent Alarm Delivery Versus Standard Audible Alarm Delivery in Intensive Care and High Dependency Units (DECIBEL)
Does Eliminating Alarm Noise Cacophony for Intensive Care Staff and Patients Improve Burnout and Encephalopathy Levels
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Andrah Pradesh
-
Nandyāl, Andrah Pradesh, India, 518502
- Udayananda Multispecialty Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Admission to Intensive or high dependency care unit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pre-existing diagnosis of dementia
- Endotracheally intubated (may enroll when extubated)
- CNS injury, infection, or malignancy as reason for admission.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Silent alarm strategy
The intervention consists of the implementation of a silent alarm system for the clinical environment.
The silent alarm system consists of a self-locating interface device, which is interposed between an alarm-generating device and its audio output.
This device contains communication, locating, motion, logic, and relay chips, which enable the interface device to identify its location and staff responsible for that location, as well as to detect audio output from the alarm-generating device, and to control the audible state of that output.
The Interface device can communicate with separate bone conduction headsets worn by staff, which contain sensors that confirm staff presence at the headset, and buttons for response to an alarm announcement.
The interface device then delivers alarms silently to those staff specifically responsible for its location when a responsible staff member can be identified, confirmed to be present, and accepts responsibility for the alarm through button action
|
The intervention consists of the implementation of a silent alarm system in the clinical environment.
The silent alarm system consists of a self-locating interface device, which is interposed between an alarm-generating device and its audio output.
This device contains communication, locating, motion, logic, and relay chips, which enable the interface device to identify its location and staff responsible for that location, as well as to detect audio output from the alarm-generating device, and to control the audible state of that output.
The Interface device can communicate with separate bone conduction headsets worn by staff, which contain sensors that confirm staff presence at the headset, and buttons for response to an alarm announcement.
The interface device then delivers alarms silently to those staff specifically responsible for its location when a responsible staff member can be identified, confirmed to be present, and accepts responsibility for the alarm through button action.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
In the control arm of the study, interface devices (as described in the experimental arm) will remain in place for data collection only, but will allow all alarms to be audible, and will not attempt silent alarms.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Unit noise levels (Decibels)
Time Frame: 10 seconds Decibel measurement periods will be recorded consecutively for two four-week periods, consisting of the four-week intervention period, and the four-week control period.
|
Unit noise levels will be recorded using an integrating Decibel monitor measuring 10 second periods for A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels (LA-EQ), and also C-weighted peak sound pressure (LC-Peak) for those same 10 second periods.
Both LA-EQ and LC-Peak will be averaged, and reported on the Decibel scale, a logarithmic scale of sound pressure levels from 0 Db(least sound pressure) to 194 Db (maximum measurable sound pressure).
|
10 seconds Decibel measurement periods will be recorded consecutively for two four-week periods, consisting of the four-week intervention period, and the four-week control period.
|
|
Alarm Fatigue
Time Frame: The staff response times will be measured (in seconds) for every alarm occurring during the four-week intervention and control periods.
|
Alarm fatigue is an involuntary learned response among staff alarm responders that occurs over time. When presented with a high frequency of alarms which either lack specificity of the condition to which they intend to call attention, or which have a low frequency of required staff intervention ("nuisance alarms"), staff response times become extended, and in some cases, responses do not occur at all. This trial will track staff response time as the time from alarm initiation to staff button response, or alarm audio termination. Alarm fatigue, assessed as the response time from alarm initiation to staff response (headset button response) or alarm audio termination, measured in seconds on every alarm occurring on every participating device during the study and control periods, each lasting four weeks. Time points for recording responses will be determined by alarm occurrence. Response times for the study and control periods will be averaged and compared statistically. |
The staff response times will be measured (in seconds) for every alarm occurring during the four-week intervention and control periods.
|
|
Confusion Assessment Method - (CAM-S long form)
Time Frame: The CAM-S long form will be recorded every 12 hours during the four-week experimental period and also every 12 hours during the four-week control period.
|
The CAM-S Long form is a structured assessment to evaluate the presence and severity of delirium.
It consists of a structured clinical assessment that has proven to be reproducible and an accurate measure of delirium presence and severity.
The CAM-S has a scoring range of 0-19 with higher scores indicating a greater severity of delirium.
|
The CAM-S long form will be recorded every 12 hours during the four-week experimental period and also every 12 hours during the four-week control period.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Nursing Work
Time Frame: Two four-week periods consisting of one four-week period as active intervention unit, and one four-week period as control unit.
|
Nursing Work - Pedometer Measurements.
All nurses in each participating unit will wear a pedometer during work shifts.
Pedometers will record the number of steps taken during each shift.
At the end of each shift, nurses will record the number of steps taken, and the length of the shift (hours).
At the end of each four-week period as either study or control, the total number of steps recorded for nursing shifts in that unit will be divided by the total number of shift hours recorded in that unit over the four-week period, to determine the average hourly step count for that unit during the four-week period of either study or control unit.
|
Two four-week periods consisting of one four-week period as active intervention unit, and one four-week period as control unit.
|
|
Total Audio Time
Time Frame: Two four-week periods consisting of one four-week period for each unit as control arm, and one four-week period for each unit as intervention arm.
|
The time that audio equipment generates an audio signal will be monitored and recorded.
The total cumulative duration (in hours, minutes and seconds) that all monitored medical equipment generates audio output signals in the observed unit will be recorded for two four-week periods consisting of one four-week period while the unit serves as control, and a separate four-week intervention period.
|
Two four-week periods consisting of one four-week period for each unit as control arm, and one four-week period for each unit as intervention arm.
|
|
Use of medications intended to treat agitation
Time Frame: Cumulative doses of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine administered to all participants up to day 28 of the intervention and control periods.
|
Use of haloperidol or dexmedetomidine
|
Cumulative doses of haloperidol and dexmedetomidine administered to all participants up to day 28 of the intervention and control periods.
|
|
Artificial intelligence observed rest
Time Frame: Artificial intelligence observed rest will be monitored every 10 minutes for two four-week periods, consisting of the four-week control period and the four-week intervention period.
|
A camera based artificial intelligence system will observe sleep/wake appearance every 10 minutes in both intervention and control units for the two four-week study periods.
This system has been trained to observe and differentiate the appearance of sleep and wake.
The system will track sleep and wake appearance for each individual every 10 minutes for the two complete four-week periods of study and intervention arms.
|
Artificial intelligence observed rest will be monitored every 10 minutes for two four-week periods, consisting of the four-week control period and the four-week intervention period.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Silent vs Audible alarm time
Time Frame: This proportional measurement will serve as a baseline for future investigators
|
The total and proportional alarm time that equipment spent in audible and silent states will be recorded during the intervention period.
|
This proportional measurement will serve as a baseline for future investigators
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel F Niendorff, MD, MindWave Medical
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- D26
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nursing Workload
-
University of SouthamptonImperial College London; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; Portsmouth... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingNursing WorkloadUnited Kingdom
-
Willemijn BerkhoutNot yet recruitingNursing Workload
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNot yet recruitingNursing Workload | Critical Care, Intensive Care | Cost AnalysisTaiwan
-
University Hospital, AngersRecruitingNursing Workload | Intensive Care (ICU) | Central Venous Catheter Related Infections | Critical Care Nursing | Catheter-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI)France
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaOura RingEnrolling by invitationNursing Workload | Burnout, Healthcare WorkersUnited States
-
Erasmus Medical CenterCompleted
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompleted
-
Istinye UniversityNot yet recruitingAnesthesiologist WorkloadTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisURC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker CochinCompletedNurses's WorkloadFrance
-
Sheba Medical CenterUnknownClinical Workload Assessment Based Upon a Home Monitoring SystemIsrael
Clinical Trials on Silent alarm strategy
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneMinistry of Health, FranceRecruiting
-
Region SkaneKarolinska University Hospital; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; Skane... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity of KentRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedSecondary Arthritis | Primary ArthritisDenmark, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Duke UniversityNot yet recruitingEpilepsy Intractable
-
Philips HealthcareCompletedClinical AlarmsGermany
-
Universiteit AntwerpenBelgian Federal Public Service, Food Chain Safety and EnvironmentCompletedDeath, Sudden, Cardiac | Unexpected Hospital Mortality | Unplanned Intensive Care Unit AdmissionBelgium