- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07372495
Cerclage Plus Progesterone vs Progesterone Alone in Twin Short Cervix (VNTWINC)
Cervical Cerclage Plus Vaginal Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Alone in Twin Pregnancies With a Short Cervix for Prevention of Preterm Birth: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The incidence of multiple pregnancies has increased rapidly over the years mainly due to the resultant widespread use of assisted reproduction techniques. The twin birth rate in the USA has risen 70%, from 19 per 1000 live births in 1980 to 31 per 1000 live births in 2020. Twin pregnancies have a high risk on preterm birth (PTB) which is associated with increased risk of neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity. Around 60% of twin pregnancies deliver prior to 37 weeks and 12% before 34 weeks of gestation, with rates 5 and 8 times higher than the equivalent rates for a singleton pregnancy, respectively. Children born at an early gestational age are at increased risk of short-term morbidities affecting vital organ systems such as lungs, brain, bowels and are at increased risk of severe infection and sepsis. Perinatal mortality is strongly associated with extreme PTB. Survivors are at increased risk for developmental and behavioral disorders. In Vietnam, the rate of twin pregnancies deliver at < 28 weeks was about 11% in 2019. Caring for extremely premature infants is a significant burden for families and society. Therefore, obstetricians have a need for high-quality evidence for effective treatments.
Cervical length measurement (ideally transvaginal) is the preferred method of screening for preterm birth in twins; 25mm is a pragmatic cut-off between 18 and 24 gestational weeks (Grade of recommendation: C). Majority of the studies conducted previously has taken the cut-off cervical length as ≤ 25 mm. A systematic review and meta-analysis (13 retrospective studies and 3 RCTs) showed that cervical cerclage may reduce preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a cervical length <25 mm; however, preterm birth before 37, 34, and 28 weeks remained high (56.7%, 38.8%, and 11.7%, respectively)5, compared with much lower rates in singleton pregnancies (6.2%, 4.7%, and 0.4%). These findings support the need for further studies on preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with a cervical length >25 mm. In 2025, Yen et al. showed that cervical cerclage was more effective than pessary in twin pregnancies with a cervical length ≤28 mm, particularly in reducing preterm birth <28 weeks, with benefit observed at 25-28 mm. However, preterm birth rates remained high, suggesting that intervention at a higher cervical length threshold may be justified. Given gestational age-related cervical shortening and the substantially higher preterm birth risk in twins, a higher threshold corresponding to the 10th percentile (≤30 mm) has been proposed. Accordingly, we selected ≤30 mm as the intervention threshold in twin pregnancies.
In singleton pregnancies, vaginal progesterone is recommended as the primary intervention for pregnant women with a cervical length less than 25mm with consistently demonstrated effectiveness in preventing premature labor. In cases with a prior spontaneous preterm delivery and a short cervix, the placement of a vaginal cerclage should be considered. Conversely, there is less evidence on the optimal strategy for preventing PTB in twin pregnancies. In twins, IM 17- OHPC and cervical pessary are not indicated in order to prevent PTB. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone and cerclage remains unclear. Several randomized trials and systematic reviews reported little or no benefit of cerclage in twin pregnancies. However, these studies were limited by small sample size and large heterogeneity in their inclusion criteria, study populations, and outcomes observed. The data are insufficient to recommend for or against these interventions in the clinical circumstances. Moreover, in the a last few years, an increasing number of studies reporting a potential beneficial role of cerclage in reducing the risk of PTB and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies have been published. The latest ISUOG practice guidelines (2025) stated that a combined strategy of physical-exam-indicated cerclage, antibiotics, and tocolytics may be considered in asymptomatic twin pregnancy with dilated cervix before 24 weeks of gestation and a cervical cerclage may be considered when the cervical length is ≤ 15 mm before 24 weeks of gestation (grade of recommendation: C). However, these findings are mainly based on observational studies and require confirmation in large and adequately powered RCTs.
In conclusion, there is a lack of well-designed RCT's on the effect of vaginal cerclage in asymptomatic twin pregnancies. We propose a multi-center randomized trial on the effectiveness of vaginal cerclage in women with a twin pregnancy and a short cervix (less than 30mm) in the second trimester with relevant outcomes assessing not only PTB at different cut-offs but also adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
This open label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical cerclage combined with progesterone versus progesterone alone in preventing preterm birth among women with twin pregnancies with a cervix ≤ 30 mm.
Cervical length will be measured routinely in twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation by qualified doctors via transvaginal ultrasound. Women with a cervical length ≤30 mm will be eligible for the study. Eligible participants will receive a Participant Information Sheet and provide written informed consent after discussion with the investigators. All eligible women will be invited to participate in the study.
Six centers are involved in the study and patients will be stratified by center. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either cerclage plus progesterone or progesterone alone, using block randomization with a variable block size of 4, 6. To ensure allocation concealment, the random lists will be generated by www.sealedenvelope.com. Upon identification of an eligible participant, randomization data will be sequentially accessed an administrative staff who does not involve in clinical intervention. The random allocation will be conveyed to responsible clinicians. Due to the nature of interventions, the obstetricians and patients will not be blinded. Apart from randomization, patients will be managed and treated preterm birth (if present) according to local protocol.
In participants allocated to cerclage plus progesterone group, a Mersilene suture (Ethicon, LLC, United State) will be placed around the cervix in a purse-string fashion and securely tied anteriorly, following the McDonald technique under spinal anesthesia. The intervention needs to be performed before 24+0 weeks of gestation, by a team of dedicated obstetricians in our hospitals (2 to 3 obstetricians in each centers) to ensure the quality of the surgical procedure. For standardization of the cervical cerclage technique, all participating physicians received standardized training before study initiation. Prophylactic antibiotic: First/Second - generation Cephalosporin will be administered intravenously 1 hour before the procedure. In case of reporting an allergy to Cephalosporin, Clindamycin (Dalacin C® 600mg/4ml Pfizer, Belgium) will be used. Additional vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from 2 days after receiving cerclage to 37+0/7 week of gestation or preterm birth whatever comes first.
In participants allocated to progesterone alone group, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime, from after randomization to 37+0/7 week of gestation or in case of preterm birth whatever comes first.
In both group, participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days. At every visit, their compliance was documented by checking the diary and drug purchasing records from the hospital pharmacy. Compliance rate was calculated by dividing the number of progesterone doses used by the number of progesterone doses that should have been used since the last visit. Participants were considered compliant when their drugs used-to-prescribed rate was 80%.
Follow-up examination will be 7 days after randomization and then 2 weeks apart until delivery. At every exam, we perform routine antenatal care and CL measurement, record drug compliance and reveal any adverse events or complications. In case of premature rupture of the membranes, active vaginal bleeding, other signs of preterm labor, or severe discomfort of the participant, the use of cerclage and/or progesterone will be discontinued. Further treatment was indicated per local protocol. All interventions were terminated at 37 weeks or at delivery, whichever came first. Delivery will take place by either spontaneous onset of labor, induction of labor, or elective cesarean section according to national guidelines for twin pregnancies.
In cases where the patient delivers at hospitals that are not among the six study sites, data on neonatal and obstetric outcomes will be collected through telephone follow-up and medical record summaries obtained from the respective healthcare facilities.
The selected outcome measures correspond to the core outcome set established for studies on preterm birth prevention by GONet and the Core Outcomes in Women's Health initiative.
Hospital costs will be measured from hospital costs of patients and neonates.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Thu Ha T Nguyen, Assoc. Prof
- Phone Number: 84965995599
- Email: dr.hanguyen.nhog@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Viet C Dang, MD, MsC
- Phone Number: 84346150993
- Email: dangviethmu@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bac Ninh, Vietnam, 220000
- Not yet recruiting
- Bac Ninh 1 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam
-
Contact:
- Tuoc C Le, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 84983350133
- Email: cachmangthanhcong@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Hung V Dam, MD, MSC
- Phone Number: 8485909334
- Email: drhungsn@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Tuoc C Le, MD, MSc
-
Bac Ninh, Vietnam, 220000
- Not yet recruiting
- Bac Ninh 2 Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh, Vietnam
-
Contact:
- Bich Thanh T Nguyen, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 84912 585 033
- Email: thanhbssan@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- My Hanh T Le, MD, MSC
- Phone Number: 84389981505
- Email: svquany@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Bich Thanh T Nguyen, MD, MSc
-
Hanoi, Vietnam, 100000
- Recruiting
- National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
Contact:
- Anh D Nguyen, Professor, MD, PhD, Director
- Phone Number: 84985259999
- Email: nguyenduyanh.nhog@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Thu Ha T Nguyen, Assoc. Prof., Dep. Director
- Phone Number: 84965995599
- Email: dr.hanguyen.nhog@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Viet C Dang, MD, MSc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Anh T Ngo, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hung S Ho, Assoc. Prof., MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hung Q Dang, MD, MSc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Giang M Pham, MD, MSc
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Trac M Le, MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Trang M Nguyen, MSc
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anh D Nguyen, Professor, MD, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Thu Ha T Nguyen, Assoc. Prof. MD, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ben W Mol, Professor, MD, PhD
-
Hung Yen, Vietnam, 160000
- Not yet recruiting
- Hung Yen Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Hung Yen, Vietnam
-
Contact:
- Thanh Huyen T Vu, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 84978844859
- Email: giamdoc2025f2@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Thanh P Tran, MD, MSC
- Phone Number: 84988102988
- Email: drthanhtran102@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Thanh Huyen T Vu, MD, MSc
-
Ninh Binh, Vietnam, 430000
- Not yet recruiting
- Ninh Binh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Ninh Binh, Vietnam
-
Contact:
- Dau V Pham, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 84912129565
- Email: drdau70@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Hue T Pham, MD, MSC
- Phone Number: 84943706662
- Email: dr.phamhue911@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Dau V Pham, MD, MSc
-
Quang Ninh, Vietnam, 200000
- Not yet recruiting
- Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Quang Ninh, Vietnam
-
Contact:
- Cuong M Bui, MD, MSc
- Phone Number: 84912356818
- Email: buiminhcuong1975@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Trang T Tran, MD, MSC
- Phone Number: 84368479884
- Email: hoatrangnguyen93yd@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Cuong M Bui, MD, MSc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Maternal age ≥ 18
- Twin pregnancy
- Asymptomatic short cervix (CL≤30mm) at routine ultrasound investigation
- Gestational age at 16+0- 24+0 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
A potential paticipant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this trial:
- Women with twin pregnancy in which one or both fetuses are diagnosed with a major structural or congenital abnormality that is likely to influence the composite adverse neonatal outcome.
- Women with a monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy
- A monochorionic twin pregnancy with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome before or at the time of inclusion.
- Patients have indications for vaginal cerclage: Recurrent late miscarriage (from 14 weeks) or preterm birth occurring two or more times.
- Women with dilatation of the cervix diagnosed by ultrasound or physical exam
- Women with overt symptoms of preterm labor at the time of measurement of the short cervix (regular contractions, PPROM, recurrent blood loss).
- Women with the presence of fever ≥ 38 degrees Celsius.
- Women with a placenta previa, vasa previa.
- Uterine malformations: unicornuate uterus, bicornuate uterus, uterine septum, fibroid…
- Severe maternal conditions (heart failure, chronic kidney disease, systemic lupus erythematosus …)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Cerclage plus progesterone
Participants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization.
The procedure will be performed by three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage, using the McDonald technique.
In addition, vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime.
Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.
|
Participants will receive cervical cerclage according to local protocols within one week after randomization.
The procedure will be performed by two to three senior clinicians experienced in cerclage in each center, using the McDonald technique.
Vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime.
Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Progesterone alone
Vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime.
Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days
|
Vaginal micronized progesterone will be administered at a total daily dose of 400 mg, given as Utrogestan® 200 mg (Besins Healthcare, France) twice daily, in the morning and at bedtime.
Participants will be asked to record their vaginal progesterone application in a patient diary sheet for up to 140 days.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Preterm birth < 28 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gestational age at birth
Time Frame: At birth
|
Number of completed weeks and days of gestation at the time of delivery, calculated based on the date of embryo transfer for pregnancies conceived via in vitro fertilization (IVF), or by ultrasound measurement of the crown-rump length (CRL) of the larger fetus between 11 weeks and 13 weeks 6 days of gestation, or by head circumference measurement for pregnancies beyond 14 weeks of gestation.
|
At birth
|
|
Preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
|
Preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
|
Preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
|
Spontaneous preterm birth <28 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
|
From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
|
Spontaneous preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 32 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
|
From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
|
Spontaneous preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
|
From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
|
Spontaneous preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with spontaneous preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation, including preterm spontaneous rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)
|
From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
|
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 28 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 28 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 27 6/7 weeks
|
|
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 32 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 32 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 31 6/7 weeks
|
|
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 34 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 34 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 33 6/7 weeks
|
|
Iatrogenic preterm birth < 37 weeks
Time Frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
Number of participants with non-spontaneously before 37 weeks of gestation
|
From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
|
Preterm premature rupture of membranes
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 37 weeks of gestation
|
Number of participants diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), defined as spontaneous rupture of membranes before 37 weeks of gestation and prior to the onset of labor.
Diagnosis is based on clinical signs, including pooling of amniotic fluid in the vaginal vault.
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 37 weeks of gestation
|
|
Hospital costs
Time Frame: From randomization to the time of hospital discharge of both the mother and the neonate(s), assessed up to 90 days after delivery
|
Total hospital-related cost per participant, including: Direct medical costs (e.g., fees for consultations, medications, antenatal and delivery monitoring, treatment of complications related to cervical cerclage, and neonatal care during hospitalization)
|
From randomization to the time of hospital discharge of both the mother and the neonate(s), assessed up to 90 days after delivery
|
|
Maternal death
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Death of the mother
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Composite of maternal adverse outcome
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants who have any of the following maternal complications: chorioamnionitis, necrosis or rupture of the cervix, preterm premature rupture of the membranes, maternal death
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Apgar score at 1 minute
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 minute after birth
|
Apgar score at 1 minute
|
Assessed at 1 minute after birth
|
|
Apgar score at 5 minutes
Time Frame: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
|
Apgar score at 5 minutes
|
Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
|
|
Apgar Score < 7 at 5 minutes
Time Frame: Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
|
Apgar Score < 7 at 5 minutes
|
Assessed at 5 minutes after birth
|
|
Birthweight
Time Frame: At birth
|
The weight of the live-born infant measured in grams at birth
|
At birth
|
|
Number of neonates in need for respiratory supports
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates requiring respiratory support, including intubation, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Length of ventilation
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of days the neonate required respiratory support with mechanical ventilation (invasive or non-invasive), counted from the initiation of ventilation until final discontinuation.
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Respiratory distress syndrome
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), based on clinical signs (chest movement, intercostal retraction, xiphoid retraction, nasal flaring, expiratory grunt) and classified by Silverman score.
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Length of neonatal intensive care unit stay
Time Frame: From admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit until neonatal hospital discharge or hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of days of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay
|
From admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit until neonatal hospital discharge or hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Length of neonatal admission
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Total number of days of neonatal hospitalization, including stays in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the neonatal department
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Neonatal infection
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates with the presence of a clinically ill infant in whom systemic infection is suspected with a positive blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or catheterized/supra-pubic urine culture; or, in the absence of positive cultures, clinical evidence of cardiovascular collapse or an X-ray confirming infection
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Neonatal seizures
Time Frame: From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates with neonatal seizures
|
From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Intra-ventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates diagnosed with grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage by ultrasonography
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)
Time Frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) based on the clinical signs triad of abdominal distension, gastrointestinal bleeding, and pneumatosis intestinalis (air in bowel wall on abdominal X-ray) classified by Modified Bell's criteria.
|
From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Neonatal sepsis
Time Frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates diagnosed with neonatal sepsis based on clinical signs (such as temperature instability, respiratory distress, lethargy, feeding difficulties) combined with laboratory evidence of infection (positive blood culture or other sterile site cultures) during the neonatal hospitalization period.
The attending neonatologist confirms the diagnosis.
|
From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Neonatal referred hospital transfer for severe morbidities
Time Frame: From birth until referral to another neonatal hospital, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates referred to other hospitals for severe morbidities
|
From birth until referral to another neonatal hospital, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Stillbirth
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with stillbirth occurring at or after 28 weeks of gestation during the study period.
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Neonatal deaths
Time Frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of intrapartum, neonatal, and perinatal deaths
|
From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Composite neonatal adverse outcome
Time Frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates who have any of the following neonatal outcome: neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III and IV, necrotizing enterocolitis, perinatal death.
|
From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Maternal side effects
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with at least one of the following: chorioamnionitis, severe bleeding, cervical necrosis, or cervical rupture
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of admission episodes for threatened preterm birth
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of admission episodes for threatened preterm birth
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants having maternal post-partum blood transfusion
Time Frame: From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants having maternal post-partum blood transfusion
|
From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants with hysterectomy
Time Frame: From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Hysterectomy for any postpartum complications
|
From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of patients with TTTS after randomization
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of patients diagnosed with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) after randomization
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants diagnosed with TTTS after randomization who received treatment during the study period
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants diagnosed with TTTS after randomization who received fetoscopic laser photocoagulation, serial amnioreduction, septostomy, selective reduction, or expectant management, from diagnosis until delivery
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of patients with preeclampsia
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of patients diagnosed with preeclampsia
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who required insulin therapy during the study period
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) who required insulin therapy during the study period
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Length of hospital stay for treatment of threatened preterm birth
Time Frame: From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
Cumulative duration of hospital stay for treatment of threatened preterm birth (days)
|
From randomization until 36 6/7 weeks
|
|
Number of participants diagnosed with congenital anomalies after randomization
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants diagnosed with congenital anomalies after randomization during the study period
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants with rupture of the cervix during labor related to prior cerclage
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with rupture of the cervix during labor related to prior cerclage
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants diagnosed with chorioamnionitis
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants diagnosed with chorioamnionitis, defined as clinical intra-amniotic infection based on maternal fever (≥38.0°C) and at least two of the following criteria: uterine tenderness, fetal tachycardia (>160 beats per minute), maternal tachycardia (>100 beats per minute), foul-smelling amniotic fluid, or maternal leukocytosis (>15 × 10⁹/L).
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants with vaginal delivery
Time Frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with vaginal delivery
|
From randomization until delivery, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants with maternal infection
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with fever (defined as a temperature ≥37.5 degrees Celsius), start of intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics (with evidence of infection confirmed by clinical and subclinical presentation), endometritis, myometritis or urinary tract infection
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants admitted to intensive care unit
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants admitted to intensive care unit
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Length of intensive care unit stay
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of days in intensive care unit stay
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of neonates requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at birth
Time Frame: From delivery to 72 hours postnatal
|
Defined as the number of live-born neonates who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) immediately after birth, including interventions such as positive pressure ventilation, chest compressions, and/or administration of medications, as per neonatal resuscitation guidelines.
|
From delivery to 72 hours postnatal
|
|
Reason for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission
Time Frame: From delivery until Neonatal Intensive Care Unit discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Reason for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission such as: respiratory distress, hypoglycemia, seizures, etc
|
From delivery until Neonatal Intensive Care Unit discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Length of neonatal hospital stay
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Total number of days from birth until hospital discharge for each live-born neonate.
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Number of neonates with neonatal infection
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates with presence of a clinically ill infant in whom systemic infection is suspected with a positive blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or catheterized/supra-pubic urine culture; or, in the absence of positive cultures, clinical evidence of cardiovascular collapse or an X-ray confirming infection
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Number of neonates with neonatal seizures
Time Frame: From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates with neonatal seizures
|
From delivery to neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Number of neonates with hypoglycemia
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates with hypoglycemia
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Number of neonates referred to other hospitals for severe morbidities
Time Frame: From delivery until neonatal hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
Number of neonates referred to other hospitals for severe morbidities
|
From delivery until neonatal hospital referral, assessed up to 3 months corrected age
|
|
Number of participants with post-partum hemorrhage
Time Frame: Within 24 hours from delivery
|
Defined as blood loss >500 ml at vaginal birth or >1000 ml at caesarean birth within 24 hours after birth
|
Within 24 hours from delivery
|
|
Number of participants with uterine rupture
Time Frame: From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with uterine dehiscence (defined as clinically asymptomatic disruption of the uterus that is discovered incidentally at surgery) or rupture (defined as clinically significant rupture involving the full thickness of the uterine wall and requiring surgical repair)
|
From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants with other post-partum complications
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants with at least one of the following: venous embolism, pulmonary embolism, stroke, or cardiac arrest
|
From randomization until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Number of participants referred to other hospital due to severe morbidities
Time Frame: From randomization until maternal hospital referral, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Number of participants referred to another hospital due to severe morbidities, including pulmonary embolism, stroke, and cardiorespiratory arrest.
|
From randomization until maternal hospital referral, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
|
Postpartum blood transfusion volume
Time Frame: From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Total volume of blood products (in milliliters) transfused to the participant after delivery, including packed red blood cells, whole blood, or other blood components, recorded from delivery until hospital discharge.
|
From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days after delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Anh D Nguyen, Prof, MD,PhD, National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Akar B, Ceylan Y, Kahraman A, Kole E, Caliskan E. Centile charts of cervical length in singleton and twin pregnancies between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2023 Jun 7;24(2):114-119. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2023.2022-7-3. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
- He YTN, Pham HNH, Nguyen TC, Bui TQ, Vuong NT, Nguyen DTN, Le TV, Li W, Le CH, Ho TM, Mol BW, Dang VQ, Vuong LN. Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 21;22(2):e1004526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004526. eCollection 2025 Feb.
- van 't Hooft J. A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth: summary for CROWN. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):666. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14003. No abstract available.
- van 't Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M, Williamson PR, Meher S, Thom E, Saade GR, Alfirevic Z, Mol BWJ, Khan KS; Global Obstetrics Network (GONet). A Core Outcome Set for Evaluation of Interventions to Prevent Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001195.
- D'Antonio F, Eltaweel N, Prasad S, Flacco ME, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies with short cervical length or cervical dilatation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2023 Aug 3;20(8):e1004266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004266. eCollection 2023 Aug.
- Wu FT, Chen YY, Chen CP, Sun FJ, Chen CY. Outcomes of ultrasound-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;59(4):508-513. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.007.
- Freegard GD, Donadono V, Impey LWM. Emergency cervical cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with 0-mm cervical length or prolapsed membranes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):2003-2008. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14255. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
- Roman A, Zork N, Haeri S, Schoen CN, Saccone G, Colihan S, Zelig C, Gimovsky AC, Seligman NS, Zullo F, Berghella V. Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):902.e1-902.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.047. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
- Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Nicolaides K, Chaiworapongsa T, O'Brien JM, Cetingoz E, da Fonseca E, Creasy G, Soma-Pillay P, Fusey S, Cam C, Alfirevic Z, Hassan SS. Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):42.e1-42.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.877. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
- Jarde A, Lutsiv O, Park CK, Barrett J, Beyene J, Saito S, Dodd JM, Shah PS, Cook JL, Biringer AB, Giglia L, Han Z, Staub K, Mundle W, Vera C, Sabatino L, Liyanage SK, McDonald SD. Preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies with progesterone, pessary, or cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017 Jul;124(8):1163-1173. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14513. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
- D'Antonio F, Berghella V, Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Sileo F, Flacco ME, Odibo AO, Liberati M, Manzoli L, Khalil A. Role of progesterone, cerclage and pessary in preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.023. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
- Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):e65-e90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004479.
- van Gils L, Dutilh R, Denswil N, Roman A, de Boer MA, Pajkrt E, Oudijk MA. The effectiveness of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the reduction of extreme preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2025 Jan;7(1):101555. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101555. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
- Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, Baschat A, Bhide A, Gratacos E, Hecher K, Lewi L, Salomon LJ, Thilaganathan B, Ville Y. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb;65(2):253-276. doi: 10.1002/uog.29166. Epub 2025 Jan 15. No abstract available.
- Dang VQ, Nguyen LK, Pham TD, He YTN, Vu KN, Phan MTN, Le TQ, Le CH, Vuong LN, Mol BW. Pessary Compared With Vaginal Progesterone for the Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women With Twin Pregnancies and Cervical Length Less Than 38 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):459-467. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003136.
- Litwinska E, Syngelaki A, Cimpoca B, Frei L, Nicolaides KH. Outcome of twin pregnancy with two live fetuses at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):32-38. doi: 10.1002/uog.21892. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
- Osterman M, Hamilton B, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: Final Data for 2020. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Feb;70(17):1-50.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Obstetric Labor, Premature
- Obstetric Labor Complications
- Pregnancy Complications
- Premature Birth
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Polycyclic Compounds
- Pregnanes
- Steroids
- Fused-Ring Compounds
- Gonadal Steroid Hormones
- Gonadal Hormones
- Pregnenediones
- Pregnenes
- Obstetric Surgical Procedures
- Corpus Luteum Hormones
- Progesterone Congeners
- Progesterone
- Cerclage, Cervical
- Utrogestan
Other Study ID Numbers
- NHOG-VN.TWIN CERCLAGE
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Preterm
-
University of WashingtonRecruitingVery Preterm and Extremely Preterm BirthUnited States
-
Turku University HospitalRecruitingPreterm Infant Development | Preterm Infant HealthJapan, South Korea
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Kilis 7 Aralik UniversityCompletedPreterm Labor | Preterm Labor with Preterm Delivery in Third Trimester | Preterm Spontaneous Labor with Preterm DeliveryTurkey
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruitingPreterm Labor With Preterm DeliveryEgypt
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingPreterm Delivery | Threatened Preterm LaborFrance
-
PreTeL, IncDuke University; University of RochesterRecruitingPreterm Birth | Threatened Preterm Labor | PreTerm LaborUnited States
-
Konya Meram State HospitalRecruitingPregnancy Preterm | Preterm Labor Without DeliveryTurkey
-
Federico II UniversityRecruiting
-
University of OxfordShoklo Malaria Research UnitCompleted
Clinical Trials on Cervical cerclage
-
Zagazig UniversityRecruitingPreterm Birth | Twin Pregnancy, Antepartum Condition or Complication | Cervical CerclageEgypt
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedPreterm Birth | Twin Pregnancy With Antenatal Problem | Cervical ShorteningEgypt
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknown
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedLabor, PrematureUnited States
-
Obstetrix Medical GroupTerminatedFetal Membranes, Premature RuptureUnited States
-
Maternal-Infantil Vall d´Hebron HospitalCompletedCervical InsufficiencySpain
-
St George's, University of LondonUnknownPreterm Birth | Twin Pregnancy With Antenatal Problem | Twin to Twin Transfusion SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityRecruiting
-
Ningbo UniversityThe Affiliated Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital of Ningbo University; Yinzhou...Not yet recruiting
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityFederico II UniversityRecruitingPreterm Birth | Twin Pregnancy With Antenatal Problem | Short CervixUnited States, Egypt, Italy, Spain