An Immediate Implant Will be Placed Using the MiniNaviDent System and Static Guide. A Postoperative CBCT Scan Will Then be Acquired and Superimposed Onto the Preoperative CBCT Scan to Assess and Compare Implant Deviation Relative to the Preoperative Plan

February 8, 2026 updated by: Ain Shams University

Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Dynamic Navigation System. "Randomized Clinical Trial"

This clinical study aims to evaluate implant deviation during immediate implant placement using dynamic navigation. By utilizing implant planning software, two CBCT scans (preoperative and postoperative) will be superimposed to assess the accuracy of dynamic navigation in immediate implant placement, which is considered a more complex procedure compared to delayed implant placement

Study Overview

Detailed Description

First, a fiducial marker will be placed in the patient's mouth, followed by a CBCT scan with the marker in position. The implant will then be virtually planned using implant planning software. Using the MiniNaviDent system and the fiducial marker, the implant will be placed. After placement, a postoperative CBCT scan will be obtained. The postoperative scan will be superimposed onto the preoperative scan to measure implant deviation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cairo Governorate
      • Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 11566
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy patients at least 21 years old.
  2. Systemically healthy patients with no effect on the surgery.
  3. At least one hopeless maxillary or mandibular tooth to be restored using an implant.
  4. At least six residual teeth in the affected jaw.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A medical condition or medication that would impair bone healing.
  2. Poor oral hygiene
  3. Alcohol users.
  4. Smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
  5. History of head and neck radiotherapy.
  6. Pregnant females.
  7. Uncontrolled hypertensive or diabetic patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dynamic navigation-guided implant placement
Dental implant osteotomy preparation and implant insertion performed using a dynamic navigation system to guide implant placement in real time according to the digital plan (CBCT-based planning with intraoperative navigation guidance)

Dental implant placement performed using a dynamic computer-assisted navigation system with real-time guidance. The implant position is planned pre-operatively using CBCT (and intraoral scan data if applicable). During surgery, the system tracks the patient reference and the drill/handpiece and displays real-time guidance to follow the planned implant trajectory for osteotomy preparation and implant insertion.

Device name: mini Navident

Active Comparator: Static guided implant placement
Implant placement performed using a patient-specific CAD/CAM static surgical guide fabricated from the digital plan.
Dental implant placement performed using a patient-specific CAD/CAM static surgical guide. The guide is designed from the digital implant plan (CBCT and, if applicable, intraoral scan) and fabricated (e.g., 3D printed). The static guide (with sleeves) is used to guide osteotomy preparation and implant insertion according to the planned implant position.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coronal deviation (mm) Apical deviation (mm)
Time Frame: Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery
Implant deviation was defined as the discrepancy between the planned implant position (as established in the preoperative planning software) and the actual implant position placed using dynamic navigation and a static surgical guide. To quantify this deviation, the postoperative CBCT was superimposed (registered) onto the preoperative planned CBCT, and the resulting spatial differences between the planned and placed implants were measured and reported in millimeters (mm)
Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery
Angular deviation (degrees)
Time Frame: Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery
Implant deviation was defined as the discrepancy between the planned implant position (as established in the preoperative planning software) and the actual implant position placed using dynamic navigation and a static surgical guide. To quantify this deviation, the postoperative CBCT was superimposed (registered) onto the preoperative planned CBCT, and the resulting spatial differences between the planned and placed implants were measured and reported in and the angular deviation in degrees was measured.
Pre-op CBCT and post-op CBCT within 7 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total surgical time (minutes)
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Total operative time recorded in minutes from first mucosal incision to completion of final implant insertion (last implant fully seated). Time will be recorded by an independent observer using a stopwatch and compared between the dynamic navigation and Static Guide groups
Intraoperative (day of surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Extraction

Clinical Trials on Dynamic navigation system-assisted dental implant placement

Subscribe