Impact of Conversational Approaches in Pediatric Social Robot-Mediated Interventions (PRIA)

January 29, 2026 updated by: Samsung Medical Center

The Impact of Conversational Approaches in Pediatric Robot-Mediated Interventions on Children's Responses in Hospital Settings: A Comparative Study of Rule-Based vs. LLM-Based Systems

This study examines how different robot dialogue systems (rule-based vs. large language model-based) and content types (emotional support vs. safety education) affect pediatric patients' responses during hospital-based robot-mediated interventions.

Approximately 60 pediatric patients aged 2-9 years will be randomly assigned to interact with a social robot (LIKU) using either rule-based or LLM-based dialogue. Each child will participate in two activity sessions (emotional content and safety content) in randomized order.

Primary outcomes include child engagement, emotional responses, robot perception, and activity preferences, assessed through standardized questionnaires (UEQ, Godspeed), child interviews, and behavioral observations. Additionally, 5 experts will evaluate content appropriateness and safety.

This pilot study aims to provide foundational data for developing personalized pediatric robot programs in hospital settings, optimizing both dialogue approaches and content design based on individual child characteristics.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients aged 2-9 years
  • Currently admitted to or visiting Samsung Medical Center pediatric ward or outpatient clinic
  • Capable of cognitive communication as determined by experienced medical staff
  • Written informed consent from parent/legal guardian obtained
  • Verbal assent from child obtained (developmentally appropriate)
  • Not in acute emergency situation
  • Able to engage in stable interaction for at least 5 minutes in hospital environment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe developmental delay (language or cognitive) documented in medical records
  • Currently in isolation treatment (e.g., due to infectious disease)
  • Experiencing acute pain, fever, or medical procedures that make study participation difficult
  • Parent/guardian or child declined participation or withdrew consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rule-Based Robot Dialogue
Participants interact with LIKU robot using pre-programmed, rule-based dialogue responses. Each participant completes two activity sessions (emotional support content and safety education content) in randomized order.
10-15 minute structured activity focusing on emotional recognition, expression, and regulation through storytelling, discussion, and artistic activities (drawing, physical expression) with the LIKU social robot
10-15 minute structured activity focusing on safety awareness and emergency response behaviors through educational videos, discussions, and hands-on activities (crafts, physical practice) with the LIKU social robot
Experimental: LLM-Based Robot Dialogue
Participants interact with LIKU robot using large language model-generated dialogue responses. Each participant completes two activity sessions (emotional support content and safety education content) in randomized order.
10-15 minute structured activity focusing on emotional recognition, expression, and regulation through storytelling, discussion, and artistic activities (drawing, physical expression) with the LIKU social robot
10-15 minute structured activity focusing on safety awareness and emergency response behaviors through educational videos, discussions, and hands-on activities (crafts, physical practice) with the LIKU social robot

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Engagement Level
Time Frame: Immediately following each intervention session (assessed within 1 hour post-session)
Behavioral observation checklist assessing attention to robot, participation in activities, and task involvement. Scored by trained observers using standardized coding scheme based on video recordings.
Immediately following each intervention session (assessed within 1 hour post-session)
User Experience
Time Frame: Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 5 minutes post-session)
User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) - standardized 7-point semantic differential scale measuring six dimensions: attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty of robot interaction.
Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 5 minutes post-session)
Robot Perception
Time Frame: Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 5 minutes post-session)
Godspeed Questionnaire Series - standardized scale measuring five dimensions of robot perception: anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety.
Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 5 minutes post-session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Content Appropriateness
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks of session completion via video review
Expert evaluation using 5-point Likert scale assessing developmental appropriateness, educational fit, robot speech pacing, content clarity, and activity flow. Evaluated by 5 pediatric development experts through video review.
Within 2 weeks of session completion via video review
Activity Preference
Time Frame: Immediately following completion of both intervention sessions (approximately 5 minutes)
Child interview using picture cards to identify preferred activities and content types (emotional support vs safety education). Children select and explain their preferences.
Immediately following completion of both intervention sessions (approximately 5 minutes)
Content Comprehension
Time Frame: Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 3 minutes)
Child interview assessing understanding of activity content, key messages, and learning points from each session using age-appropriate questions.
Immediately following each intervention session (approximately 3 minutes)
Robot Relationship Quality
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention sessions (approximately 5 minutes)
Child interview and behavioral observation assessing perceived intimacy with robot, emotional attachment, social bonding, and willingness to interact with robot again.
Immediately following intervention sessions (approximately 5 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Patients

Clinical Trials on Robot-Mediated Emotional Support Activity

Subscribe