Assessment of Exercise Capacity, Muscle Oxygenation and Aortic Stiffness in Patients With Mitral Stenosis

January 31, 2026 updated by: Meral Boşnak Güçlü, Gazi University

Comparison of Exercise Capacity, Muscle Oxygenation and Aortic Stiffness in Patients With a History of Mitral Valve Intervention for Mitral Stenosis With Healthy Subjects

Heart valve diseases are the most common cause of mortality and morbidity after coronary artery disease, hypertension, and heart failure. In patients with mitral stenosis, the narrowed valve restricts blood flow, causing symptoms such as shortness of breath, fatigue, exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. These patients may experience decreased exercise capacity and physical activity levels, deterioration in quality of life, and deterioration in respiratory function. When reviewing the literature, we see that the study groups evaluating these factors are generally not homogeneous, and most studies conducted in patients with mitral stenosis evaluate patients who have undergone percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

In mitral valve stenosis, blood flow from the left atrium to the left ventricle is mechanically restricted, resulting in increased pressure in the left atrium, pulmonary vascular bed, and right chambers of the heart. The narrowed mitral valve obstructs the flow of blood from the lungs to the heart, causing shortness of breath in patients. Increased blood volume in the left atrium may cause palpitations. Other symptoms include fatigue, exertional dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, chest pain, and dizziness.

Patients with mitral stenosis are expected to have decreased exercise capacity due to restrictive lung function, chronotropic insufficiency, limited stroke volume, and the effects of peripheral factors. Studies evaluating the exercise capacity of patients who have undergone surgery for mitral stenosis are limited.

After cardiac surgery, oxygen saturation decreases in the acute period, and hemodynamic and systemic oxygenation are often impaired. It has been suggested that muscle deoxygenation may also occur in patients with mitral stenosis due to these reasons. Studies investigating skeletal muscle oxygenation after mitral valve surgery are limited in the literature. While surgery for heart valve lesions improves cardiac function, changes in the thoracic compartment are major causes of mortality and morbidity. These changes reduce cardiorespiratory capacity, leading to physical inactivity, loss of muscle strength, and loss of fitness in patients.

Inspiratory muscle performance is impaired in patients who have undergone valve replacement surgery. Better inspiratory muscle performance in these patients is associated with better physical function. This relationship between respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity demonstrates the importance of assessing respiratory muscle strength. Mitral valve stenosis is associated with impaired aortic stiffness. In patients with heart failure, aortic stiffening plays a role in hemodynamic deterioration due to its adverse effect on left ventricular function and coronary artery perfusion. In conclusion, aortic stiffness has been shown to exacerbate the disease through multiple mechanisms. Inadequate physical activity after heart valve surgery is associated with a higher mortality rate, while adequate physical activity prevents cardiovascular events and reduces mortality in the long term. Physical activity is an important prognostic factor in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery. The quality of life of patients improves after heart valve surgery. The extent of improvement may vary depending on the surgical method used.

The primary objective of the study is to compare exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation, aortic stiffness, and quality of life in patients who have undergone surgery for mitral stenosis with those in healthy individuals.

The secondary objective of the study is to compare respiratory muscle strength and endurance, pulmonary function, and physical activity levels in patients who have undergone surgery for mitral stenosis with those in healthy individuals.

Primary outcomes are exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation, aortic stiffness, and quality of life.

Secondary outcomes are respiratory muscle strength, respiratory muscle endurance, pulmonary function and physical activity level.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Çankaya
      • Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye), 06490
        • Recruiting
        • Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Unit
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

30 patients with a history of mitral valve intervention for mitral stenosis and 30 healthy individuals will be recruited.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients;

  • Between the ages of 18-80
  • Patients who have undergone mitral valve intervention due to mitral stenosis
  • At least 3 months have passed since the intervention

Healthy controls;

  • Between the ages of 18 and 80
  • Agreeing to participate voluntarily in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients;

  • Patients who have undergone aortic valve intervention other than mitral valve intervention
  • Acute infection
  • Orthopedic, neurological or psychological disorders that will affect functional capacity

Healthy Controls;

  • diagnosed chronic disease,
  • acute infection
  • A smoking history of at least 10 packs×years or more

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients group
This group includes patients who have undergone mitral stenosis intervention for mitral stenosis. Patients exercise capacity using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), muscle oxygenation with a near-infrared spectroscopy device, respiratory functions with a spirometer, respiratory muscle strength with a mouth pressure measurement device, respiratory muscle endurance with an incremental threshold loading respiratory muscle endurance test, aortic stiffness with an arteriograph, physical activity level with a multisensor physical activity monitor and quality of life with the SF-36 Short Form will be evaluated.
Healthy Controls Group
Healthy controls will be evaluated for exercise capacity with the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET), muscle oxygenation with a near-infrared spectroscopy device, respiratory functions with a spirometer, respiratory muscle strength with a mouth pressure measurement device, respiratory muscle endurance with an incremental threshold loading respiratory muscle endurance test, aortic stiffness with an arteriograph, physical activity level with a multisensor physical activity monitor, and quality of life with the SF-36 Short Form.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal Exercise Capacity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Maximal Exercise capacity will be evaluated with Cardiopulmonary Exercise testing. The Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing will be applied according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Muscle Oxygenation
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Peripheral muscle oxygen will be measured by near-infrared spectrometry. The device probes will be placed on the trunk and lower extremities. The device allows to display of the percentage of oxygen, the concentration of oxyhemoglobin, and deoxyhemoglobin, the difference between oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, and the total hemoglobin. These parameters will be evaluated in our study.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Aortic Stiffness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Aortic stiffness will be assessed non-invasively using the SphygmoCor XCEL® device, whose validity and reliability have been proven. The device measures carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV).
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Quality of Life (Short Form 36)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the valid and reliable Short Form 36 (SF-36). The SF-36 consists of a total of 36 items across 8 health domains. The 8 health domains assessed are general health, physical functioning, social functioning, physical limitations due to health problems, emotional limitations due to health problems, pain, mental health, and energy/vitality. It assesses the individual's last month using a Likert scale. Each health domain is scored between 0 and 100. A higher score indicates better health status.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary Function (Forced vital capacity (FVC))
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, forced vital capacity (FVC)was evaluated.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary Function (Forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1))
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) was evaluated.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary Function (FEV1/FVC)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, FEV1/FVC was evaluated.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary Function (Flow rate 25-75% of forced expiratory volume (FEF25-75%))
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, Flow rate 25-75% of forced expiratory volume (FEF25-75%)was evaluated.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary Function (Peak flow rate (PEF))
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pulmonary function was evaluated using the spirometry. Dynamic lung volume measurements were conducted according to ATS and ERS criteria. With the device, peak flow rate (PEF) was evaluated.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Respiratory Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Maximal inspiratory (MIP) and maximal expiratory (MEP) pressures expressing respiratory muscle strength were measured using a portable mouth pressure measuring device according to American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society criteria.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Respiratory Muscle Endurance
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Respiratory muscle endurance will be assessed using the incremental threshold loading test.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physical activity level will be assessed using a multi-sensor activity monitor. The patient will wear the multi-sensor activity monitor continuously for 4 days using a belt at hip level on the non-dominant side.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ebrar TÜLÜMENOĞLU, Pt, Gazi University
  • Principal Investigator: Özden SEÇKİN GÖBÜT, Dr, Gazi University
  • Principal Investigator: Serkan ÜNLÜ, Dr, Gazi University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Stenosis

Subscribe