Stents Versus PAclitaxel Coated Balloons for Revascularization of CompleX and Small Coronary Vessels (SPARX) Trial (SPARX RCT)

February 2, 2026 updated by: Translumina GmbH
The main objective of the SPARX trial is to compare paclitaxel-coated balloons to with contemporary DES in complex and small coronary artery lesions in patients with NSTEACS or CCS; the co-primary objective is to compare two different paclitaxel-coated balloons, Protégé and Agent, with each other.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PCI with DES remains a cornerstone of interventional cardiology for the treatment of coronary artery disease. While DES have significantly improved outcomes compared to plain old angioplasty (POBA) and metal stents, there is still a risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis (ST). To overcome these problems, non-stent techniques using only DCBs have emerged as a way of delivering anti-proliferative drugs to the vessel wall without the need for a permanent implant. It is hypothesised that this approach may promote positive remodelling and reduce the risk of vessel thrombosis and restenosis.

The use of PCI with DCB alone was first investigated for the treatment of ISR, where it showed good results and is currently recommended in guidelines for the treatment of ISR. There have also been several DCB trials in de novo coronary lesions, but the results have been more mixed. Many DCBs are now commercially available, both with paclitaxel and sirolimus coating, and it appears that there is no "class effect" due to the heterogeneity that exists within balloon designs, polymer coating, type of drug and concentrations used.

One of the first trials in de novo lesions, the PICCOLETO trial, was stopped early due to a higher MACE rate in the DCB group compared to the DES group. However, several weaknesses of the study may explain the worse outcome in those treated with DCBs compared to DES. The most important was probably the low dose of paclitaxel delivered by the balloon and the fact that only a small percentage of the population underwent lesion predilatation. Several studies have later shown non-inferiority of DCB to DES for de novo lesions, and the method is currently embraced by the interventional cardiology community.

Several DCBs are now available and approved for use, and more are on the way, but head-to-head data are scarce. The SPARX trial is designed to compare two DCBs, Protégé™ and Agent™, with conventional DES PCI in complex and small coronary lesions, with the idea that this type of coronary disease may benefit from a DCB-only technique. The trial will also compare the two certified and well-established paclitaxel-coated balloons, Protégé™ and Agent™. The hypothesis is that Protégé™ will perform at least as well as Agent™.

The primary objective of the SPARX trial is to compare paclitaxel-coated balloons with contemporary DES in complex and small coronary artery lesions in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) or chronic coronary syndrome (CCS); The co-primary objective is to compare 2 different paclitaxel-coated balloons, Protégé™ and Agent™, with each other.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1380

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Clinical inclusion criteria:

  1. Age≥18 years
  2. Patient with NSTE-ACS or CCS with either symptoms and/or ischemia on non-invasive or invasive testing (i.e. FFR/iFR, CMR, SPECT, PET-CT or stress-echo)
  3. The patient must be able to understand and provide written informed consent and comply with all study procedures
  4. Life expectancy of > 2 years

    Angiographic inclusion criteria:

  5. One or more trial target vessel (LAD, CX or RCA, or of their branches) with:

    1. Stenosis of ≥70% or
    2. Stenosis ≥50% and <70% (visually assessed) with evidence of ischemia by positive stress test, or FFR ≤0.80, or iFR <0.90 or IVUS minimum lumen area ≤4.0 mm2
  6. The target vessel/target lesion matches at least one of the following criteria

    1. Small vessel: vessel reference diameter is ≤ 3 mm
    2. Long lesions: length ≥ 25 mm
    3. Calcified lesion: grade 3 by angiography or confirmed on intravascular imaging
    4. Chronic total occlusion (CTO)
    5. Bifurcation lesions, including ostial LAD and ostial CX
    6. Lesions in diabetic coronary artery disease
    7. In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)
  7. Lesion preparation must be according to the 3rd DCB consensus, with lesions that have:

    1. ≤ 30% residual stenosis
    2. TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3.
    3. The absence of flow-limiting dissection (Type A-C allowed only)

Clinical exclusion criteria:

  1. STEMI or cardiogenic shock related to an acute MI within 2 days prior to the index PCI
  2. Pregnancy or nursing declarations (As per country specific guideline) (a negative pregnancy test is required of women with child-bearing potential within 7 days prior to enrollment)
  3. LVEF<30%
  4. Known contraindication or hypersensitivity to any limus family drugs, paclitaxel, or to medications such as heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel and ticagrelor or any component of the devices.
  5. Allergy to imaging contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  6. Stroke/TIA during the last 6 months, or any prior intracranial hemorrhage
  7. Active peptic ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding within last 6 months
  8. Known renal insufficiency with an eGFR<30 ml/min1.73m2, or subject on dialysis, or acute renal failure (as per physician judgment)
  9. Planned surgery within 6 months with the necessity to stop DAPT
  10. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  11. Platelet count<100.000 cells/mm3 or >400.000 cells/mm3, a WBC of <3000 cells/mm3, documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis)
  12. Patient is a recipient of a heart transplant
  13. Participation in another investigation with an investigational drug or another MD within the 30 days preceding and during the present investigation

    Angiographic exclusion criteria:

  14. Target lesion is in the left main coronary artery
  15. Target lesion is in a coronary artery bypass graft
  16. Flow limiting target vessel thrombus
  17. Evidence of aneurysm in target vessel within 10 mm of the target lesion
  18. Aorto-ostial target lesion (within 3 mm of the aorta junction)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paclitaxel coated balloon
Patients are only randomized after successful lesion preparations performed as per the the 3rd DCB Consensus. Post this, if the automatic generation of the device reflects Protege on the opted platform, then the patient is enrolled in this arm of the RCT
Protégé Drug-eluting PTCA Balloon Catheters are rapid exchange catheters with a semi-compliant (Protégé DEB) balloon, or a non-compliant (NC) balloon (Protégé NC DEB), both with paclitaxel coating. Protégé is certified and CE marked.
Active Comparator: Drug coated balloon
Patients are only randomized after successful lesion preparations performed as per the the 3rd DCB Consensus. Post this, if the automatic generation of the device reflects Agent on the opted platform, then the patient is enrolled in this arm of the RCT
The AgentTM Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter (AgentTM DCB) is a monorail, semi-compliant PCI catheter. Agent™ PCB is CE and FDA certified and approved for clinical use both in Europe and in the US.
Active Comparator: Drug eluting stent (DES)
DES to standard of care treatment during percutaneous coronary intervention. In this RCT, patients are only randomized after successful lesion preparations performed as per the the 3rd DCB Consensus. Post this, if the automatic generation of the device reflects DES (CE/FDA marked) on the opted platform, then the patient is enrolled in this arm of the RCT
Drug Eluting stents is a standard of care treatment for narrowed coronary arteries of the patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE)
Time Frame: 24 months
  1. Cardiac death
  2. New target vessel - related myocardial infarction (TV-MI)
  3. Ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE)
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 month
  1. All-cause death
  2. Any Stroke
  3. All new MI (TV and non-TV related)
  4. Unplanned ischemia-driven repeat revascularization
1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 month
Additional outcomes
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 months

Total no of events in 1380 patients will be analysed-

  1. Definite or probable vessel (stent) thrombosis
  2. Ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR)
  3. Major bleeding (BARC type 3 to 5)
1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All individual components of DOCE and POCE
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 month

Total no of events in 1380 patients will be analysed -

  1. All-cause death
  2. Cardiac death
  3. Any Stroke
  4. All new MI (TV and non-TV related)
  5. Ischemia-driven TLR
  6. Unplanned ischemia-driven repeat revascularization
1 month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, 24 month
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 0 day (during index PCI)
Device success: Defined as the ability of the study devices to be delivered, dilated and retrieved from the target lesion during index procedure.
0 day (during index PCI)
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 0 day (during index PCI)
Procedure duration, radiation exposure and contrast volume.
0 day (during index PCI)
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 7 days
Procedural success: Achievement of a final diameter stenosis of < 30% (site-reported) using any PCI method, without the occurrence of death, MI or repeat vessel revascularization during index- hospital stay.
7 days
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 7 days
Acute or subacute vessel closure/thrombosis: diameter stenosis of 100% and/or TIMI flow grade 0.
7 days
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 2 days
Periprocedural myocardial injury within 48 hours (according to SCAI definition): Elevated CK-MB of >10 times upper limit of normal, or cTn (T or I)>70 times upper limit of normal within 48 hours from the procedure. If cardiac biomarker levels are elevated before the procedure, these levels will be used as the reference instead of normal values.
2 days
Other outcomes of interest
Time Frame: 7 days
Length of In-hospital stay (number of days)
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof. Dr. Florim Cuculi, MD, Cardiology Division Heart Center - Luzerner Kantonsspital Spitalstrasse, 6000 Luzern 16, Switzerland
  • Study Chair: Prof. Dr. Adnan Kastrati, MD PhD, German Heart Center Munich Lazarettstraße 36, 80636 München, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Investigators do not plan to share individual participant data. However, an overall study data and it's publication results shall be uploaded upon completion of this project at Ct.Gov.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Protégé and Protégé NC

Subscribe