TRX Suspension Training for Sarcopenia in Older Men (TRX-SARC)

February 9, 2026 updated by: WeiJin Zhang

Effects of TRX Suspension Training on Physical Fitness, Gait Performance, and Inflammatory and Growth-Related Biomarkers in Older Men With Sarcopenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of a 12-week TRX suspension training program on physical fitness, gait performance, and selected blood biomarkers in older men with sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is an age-related condition characterized by loss of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function, which increases the risk of falls, disability, and reduced quality of life.

A total of 36 older men diagnosed with sarcopenia were randomly assigned to either a TRX suspension training group or a control group. The training group participated in supervised TRX exercise sessions three times per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The control group maintained their usual daily activities without structured exercise intervention.

Physical fitness, walking ability, and blood biomarkers related to inflammation and muscle growth were assessed before and after the intervention. The study aimed to determine whether TRX suspension training is a safe and effective exercise approach for improving muscle strength, balance, walking ability, and biological indicators associated with sarcopenia in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study was a single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the effects of TRX suspension training on physical fitness, gait performance, and inflammatory- and growth-related biomarkers in older men with sarcopenia.

Eligible participants were men aged 65 years and older who met established diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia based on low handgrip strength, reduced skeletal muscle mass index, and slow gait speed. After screening, 36 participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either an experimental group receiving TRX suspension training or a control group maintaining usual daily activities.

The intervention consisted of a 12-week TRX suspension training program conducted three times per week. Each training session lasted approximately 60 minutes and included a warm-up period, a main training phase, and a cool-down period. The exercise program emphasized multi-joint, whole-body movements targeting the upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk. Training intensity and difficulty were progressively adjusted using body angle and support-point principles to ensure safety and individualized progression for older participants.

Assessments were performed before the intervention and within 48 hours after completion of the 12-week program. Outcome measures included physical fitness tests (upper- and lower-limb muscle strength, balance, and agility), gait performance tests (mobility, walking speed, and walking endurance), and fasting blood biomarkers related to inflammation and muscle growth, including interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, insulin-like growth factor-1, C-reactive protein, and vitamin D.

The primary objective of the study was to determine whether TRX suspension training could improve muscle strength and functional mobility in older men with sarcopenia. Secondary objectives included evaluating changes in gait performance and selected biological markers associated with inflammation and muscle metabolism. This study aimed to provide evidence supporting the use of TRX suspension training as a safe and effective exercise strategy for improving physical function and reducing fall risk in older adults with sarcopenia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sichuan
      • Yibin, Sichuan, China, 644000
        • Yibin University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male participants aged 65 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of sarcopenia based on established criteria, including low handgrip strength, reduced skeletal muscle mass index, and slow gait speed.
  • Ability to walk independently without assistive devices.
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness to participate in the 12-week intervention and complete all required assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe cardiovascular disease or other medical conditions that contraindicate moderate-intensity exercise.
  • Diagnosis of severe depression, dementia, or other neurological or psychiatric disorders that could interfere with participation.
  • Participation in other structured exercise or training programs during the study period.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Any musculoskeletal, neurological, or systemic condition that would prevent safe participation in the exercise intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TRX Suspension Training Group
Participants assigned to this arm received a supervised TRX suspension training program for 12 weeks. Training sessions were conducted three times per week, with each session lasting approximately 60 minutes. The program included progressive, whole-body resistance exercises targeting the upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk.
TRX suspension training was delivered as a structured, supervised exercise program conducted three times per week for 12 weeks. Each session lasted approximately 60 minutes and included warm-up, main training, and cool-down phases. The program emphasized progressive, whole-body resistance exercises targeting the upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk, with training intensity individualized through adjustments in body angle and support points.
Other: Control Group
Participants in the control group maintained their usual daily activities throughout the 12-week study period and did not participate in any structured exercise or training intervention.
Participants continued their usual daily activities during the 12-week study period and did not receive any structured exercise or training intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Handgrip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Handgrip strength was measured using a digital handgrip dynamometer. The primary outcome was the change in maximal handgrip strength from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention period.
Baseline to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 30-Second Chair Stand Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Lower-limb muscle strength was assessed using the 30-second chair stand test. The outcome was defined as the change in the number of completed stands from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in 30-Second Arm Curl Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Upper-limb muscular endurance was evaluated using the 30-second arm curl test. The outcome was the change in the number of repetitions completed from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention period.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Single-Leg Stance Time
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Static balance was assessed using the single-leg stance test. The outcome was defined as the change in maximal standing time from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Four Square Step Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Dynamic balance and agility were evaluated using the four square step test. The outcome was the change in completion time from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention period.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Timed Up and Go Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up and Go test. The outcome was defined as the change in test completion time from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in 10-Meter Walk Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Walking speed was evaluated using the 10-meter walk test. The outcome was defined as the change in walking time from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention period.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Six-Minute Walk Test Distance
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Walking endurance was assessed using the six-minute walk test. The outcome was defined as the change in total walking distance from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Serum Interleukin-6 Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Systemic inflammation was evaluated by measuring fasting serum interleukin-6 concentrations. The outcome was defined as the change in IL-6 levels from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Inflammatory status was assessed by measuring fasting serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations. The outcome was defined as the change in TNF-alpha levels from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Muscle anabolic status was assessed by measuring fasting serum insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations. The outcome was defined as the change in IGF-1 levels from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Serum Vitamin D Levels
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 weeks
Vitamin D status was evaluated by measuring fasting serum vitamin D concentrations. The outcome was defined as the change in vitamin D levels from baseline to the end of the 12-week intervention.
Baseline to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seung-Soo Baek, PhD, Department of Sport and Healthcare, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the published article, including demographic variables, baseline and post-intervention physical fitness measures, gait performance outcomes, and laboratory biomarker data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication and will remain available for up to 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to the de-identified individual participant data will be granted to qualified researchers who submit a methodologically sound proposal. Requests will be reviewed and approved by the study investigators, and data will be shared upon reasonable request in accordance with applicable ethical and data protection regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcopenia

Clinical Trials on TRX Suspension Training

Subscribe