PICO Negative Pressure for Uninfected Foot Ulcers and Wound Dehiscence (BALPIC) (BALPIC)

February 6, 2026 updated by: Ilker Uckay

PICO Negative Pressure for the Treatment of Uninfected Foot Ulcers and Wound Dehiscence - an Unblinded, Randomized-controlled, Superiority Trial (BALPIC Trial)

The investigators compare negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using the PICO 7 system versus professional wound debridement alone in adult orthopedic patients with acute, non-infected wound dehiscence or diabetic foot ulcers. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either PICO therapy (minimum 7 days, up to 42 days) or standard wound care (professional debridement without NPWT). The primary outcome is wound closure without surgical revision at Day 42. The trial is stratified for diabetic foot ulcers to enable subgroup analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Acute postoperative wound dehiscence and foot ulcers represent a frequent clinical challenge in adult orthopedic patients worldwide. According to institutional data, wound dehiscence occurs in 2-5% of elective orthopedic procedures, depending on surgery type, patient comorbidities, and obesity. Among patients with diabetes, approximately half will develop foot ulcers during their lifetime.

The management of non-infected wounds can be either surgical (revision surgery with primary closure) or conservative (professional debridement and wound care with or without negative pressure wound therapy). Despite widespread clinical experience with NPWT in orthopedic surgery, high-quality prospective evidence remains scarce. The orthopedic literature lacks adequately powered randomized controlled trials comparing NPWT to standard wound care for acute, non-infected wound dehiscence.

The investigators hypothesize that NPWT leads to superior wound closure rates (85% vs. 70%) and accelerated healing compared to professional debridement alone. The PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System creates a closed environment over the wound, evacuating exudate into an absorptive dressing while promoting secondary closure through controlled suction at -80 mmHg.

The BALPIC trial evaluates a therapeutic concept rather than comparing different NPWT devices. Infected wounds are excluded, as NPWT is conventionally avoided over purulent wounds to allow free drainage. Wound assessment is performed by specialized wound nurses using standardized measurements and photographic documentation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
        • Balgrist University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age ≥ 18 years
  • Able to consent
  • Patient of orthopaedic surgery or of the (Diabetic) Foot Polyclinic at the Balgrist University Hospital
  • Presence of an acute, dehiscent, clinically uninfected wound requiring additional measures
  • First episode of wound treatment for the actual wound (no recurrences) in the last 12 months
  • Wound measuring ≥ 0.5 cm in wide, length or depth
  • 42 days of scheduled follow-up
  • Bacterial orthopaedic infections of any nature, independently of implants or co-morbidities; according to clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological features of infection
  • First or second episode of infection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Patient's individual refusal to participate
  • Patient already treated with any vacuum-assisted wound device for any wound in the last 12 months; independently of therapy success, the hospital or the localization of the prior wound
  • Underlying liquor leak (spine surgery)
  • Visually active bleeding from the wound
  • Wound size >10 cm in any dimension
  • Anticipated active clinical follow-up of less than 42 days
  • Other wound treatments besides PICO and debridement (e.g. hyperbaric oxygen therapy, other negative-pressure devices, local antibiotics, local antibiotic dressings) (however, local antiseptics and dressing changes remain allowed)
  • Immediate surgical wound revision in the operating theatre for closure
  • Planned plastic or reconstructive surgery already at inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PICO
Application of PICO 7 Single Use NPWT System at -80 mmHg for a minimum of 7 days. PICO therapy may be continued for up to 42 days based on clinical necessity. Device change every 7 days. Wound assessment weekly. SMITH & NEPHEW MEDICAL LTD. PICO 7 15CM X 20CM; NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY POWERED SUCTION PUMP (UDI 04582111156419). The PICO system creates a closed environment over the wound, evacuating exudate into an absorptive dressing while promoting wound closure through controlled suction.

Professional wound debridement by specialized wound nurses, including dressing changes and local antiseptics if clinically indicated, without the use of any negative pressure device. Treatment for up to 42 days based on clinical necessity. Wound assessment weekly.

Individualized professional wound care according to hospital and Swiss nursing guidelines. The intensity of debridement, dressing type, and antiseptic use lies at the discretion of the wound nurse and will be recorded.

Other: Professional Wound CAre
Professional wound debridement by specialized wound nurses, including dressing changes and local antiseptics if clinically indicated, without the use of any negative pressure device. Treatment for up to 42 days based on clinical necessity. Wound assessment weekly. Individualized professional wound care according to hospital and Swiss nursing guidelines. The intensity of debridement, dressing type, and antiseptic use lies at the discretion of the wound nurse and will be recorded.

Professional wound debridement by specialized wound nurses, including dressing changes and local antiseptics if clinically indicated, without the use of any negative pressure device. Treatment for up to 42 days based on clinical necessity. Wound assessment weekly.

Individualized professional wound care according to hospital and Swiss nursing guidelines. The intensity of debridement, dressing type, and antiseptic use lies at the discretion of the wound nurse and will be recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound closure without surgical revision at Day 42
Time Frame: Day 42 (±7 days)
Wound closure is defined as reduction of wound size by a minimum of 90% compared to baseline, without need for surgical revision. Wound failure is defined as persistent wound (less than 90% reduction) after 42 days or surgical wound revision during the study period.
Day 42 (±7 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2. Rapidity of wound closure
Time Frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42
Time to achieve 90% wound size reduction.
Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42
Wound closure without surgical revision at Day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35
Time Frame: Day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 (±2 days)
Binary assessment of wound closure at each weekly visit
Day 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 (±2 days)
4. Wound closure for diabetic foot ulcers only (stratified analysis)
Time Frame: Day 42 (±7 days)
Pre-specified subgroup analysis for DFU patients.
Day 42 (±7 days)
5. Adverse events related to wound therapy
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
All adverse events during the therapy and follow-up time, including device deficiencies in the PICO arm.
Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
6. Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
Duration of hospital stay in acute care setting.
Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
7. Overall costs of hospitalization
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)
Total hospitalization costs.
Day 1 to Day 42 (±7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ilker Uçkay, Prof. Dr. med., Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Swizerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASEC 2025-D0043

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The investigators may share anonymized key elements upon reasonable scientific request to the corresponding persons

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the final analysis

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable scientific request to the corresponding Sponsor-Investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound

Clinical Trials on Professional Wound Care

Subscribe