- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07408193
The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain.
The Role of Coadministration of Lidocaine and Ketamine in Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background
Opioids are the mainstay of treatment for chronic cancer-related pain, but their use is associated with multiple adverse effects, tolerance requiring progressively higher doses, and, in rare cases, opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Standard adjuvant analgesics (antiepileptics and antidepressants) may provide modest benefit. However, despite maximally tolerated therapy, many patients continue to experience refractory pain.
Lidocaine and low-dose ketamine may be beneficial in these difficult-to-treat pain scenarios due to their favorable safety profile and mechanisms of action. The main limitation of these drugs is their short duration of action; however, mechanisms involving central plasticity and reversal of opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia may explain the longer analgesic effects observed in some studies.
Study Design
This is a randomized, double-blind, active placebo-controlled, cross-over trial evaluating the efficacy of two weekly lidocaine-ketamine (LK) infusions compared to active placebo in patients with opioid-refractory chronic cancer-related pain.
The investigators will assess:
Pain intensity and physical functioning using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Emotional functioning using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Patient-reported overall improvement using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale Total opioid consumption expressed as oral morphine equivalents (MME) Neuropathic pain effects in patients with confirmed neuropathic components using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
Adult patients presenting to the pain clinic of Attikon University General Hospital with a diagnosis of chronic cancer-related pain according to the International Association for the Study of Pain definition will be screened for eligibility. Participants will be adult patients with chronic cancer-related pain who continue to experience moderate to severe pain despite stable, optimized analgesic therapy. Eligible patients will be on a stable opioid regimen of at least 60 mg oral morphine equivalents per day for at least one week, with stable adjuvant analgesics in those with a neuropathic pain component. A minimum life expectancy of three months and the ability to provide informed consent will be required. Patients with significant hepatic or renal dysfunction, uncontrolled psychiatric or neurological illness, pregnancy, or contraindications to lidocaine, ketamine, or midazolam will be excluded. The presence of a neuropathic pain component will be assessed clinically and with validated instruments to allow exploratory subgroup analyses of treatment effects on neuropathic pain.
Randomization and Blinding Patients will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence in blocks of four.
Allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Infusions will be prepared by anesthesiology staff not involved in the trial, using identical, unmarked transparent syringes to maintain blinding.
Both patients and assessors (including companions or clinic staff assisting with questionnaires) will be blinded to treatment.
Intervention
Active intervention (LK infusion):
Lidocaine 4 mg/kg + ketamine 0.2 mg/kg, administered over 45 minutes using an electronic infusion pump Dosing based on actual body weight; for BMI >30, ideal body weight will be used
Active placebo: Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg IV over 45 minutes, selected to mimic sedative effects without analgesic activity
Procedure:
Pre-infusion: patients complete questionnaires and undergo brief clinical assessment IV cannula insertion and standard monitoring (pulse oximeter, ECG, non-invasive BP) Infusion over 45 minutes, followed by 1-hour post-infusion observation Two infusions will be administered 7 days apart After a 14-day washout, patients cross over to the alternate intervention
Rescue Analgesia
All patients will have access to rescue analgesics (e.g., oral oxycodone), converted to oral morphine equivalents for measurement and comparison.
Safety Monitoring Hepatic function: SGOT/SGPT monitored during the study Renal function: Creatinine and GFR monitored
Protocol adjustments:
If SGOT/SGPT above ULN => Extend infusion to 60 min; If SGOT/SGPT >3x ULN => Reduce lidocaine dose to 2 mg/kg; If. SGOT/SGPT >5x ULN, Child B/C liver disease, or GFR <30ml/min => Discontinue participation
Common side effects:
Lidocaine: lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste Ketamine: nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome:
Change in BPI question 3 (pain intensity) from baseline to end of treatment.
Secondary Outcomes:
Physical functioning (BPI) Emotional functioning (BDI) Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Opioid consumption (MME) Neuropathic pain (NPSI)
Statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS software package (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA) and R Project. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be applied to assess the normality of data distribution, and the level of statistical significance will be set at 5% (p < 0.05). Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), whereas those not following the normal distribution will be presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables will be presented as absolute and relative frequencies (percentages).
Comparisons between the two treatment conditions in the crossover design will be performed using the paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, depending on the normality of the data distribution. To explore potential correlations among study parameters, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) or other appropriate correlation coefficients will be calculated. If required by the study findings, additional analyses-such as multivariable logistic regression to identify independent determinants of observed changes, or mixed-effects model analyses-will be conducted.
Sample size calculation was performed using the Hedwig tool provided online by Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center. A sample of 20 patients has 80% statistical power for a level of significance of a=0.05 to detect a clinically significant change of 2 points in question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form from baseline to end of treatment assessment, given an SD of 3 based on data from studies assessing this particular outcome. Based on that, at least 20 patients need to be enrolled. We aim to enroll 24 patients.
Common side effects associated with lidocaine infusion include lightheadedness, somnolence, peri-oral paresthesia, nausea, headache, dysarthria, dry mouth, metallic taste. Common side effects associated with ketamine infusion include nausea, vomiting, psychotomimetic effects, headache, fatigue, sedation. No serious adverse events have been reported with these drugs at the dosages used in this RCT. Any adverse events will be reported, along with any action taken.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, Associate Professor
- Phone Number: +302105831997
- Email: kkalimeris@med.uoa.gr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Erond Zeneli MD, PhD candidate
- Phone Number: +306982094129
- Email: erond.zeneli@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Attica
-
Athens, Attica, Greece, 12461
- University General Hospital of Athens "Attikon" - National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School
-
Contact:
- Konstantinos Kalimeris MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
- Phone Number: +302105831997
- Email: kkalimeris@med.uoa.gr
-
Contact:
- Erond Zeneli, MD
- Phone Number: +306982094129
-
Principal Investigator:
- Erond Zeneli, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or more
- Capacity to provide informed consent, ability to complete study assessments and comply with the study procedures
- Meets the IASP definition for chronic cancer-related pain
- Moderate or severe pain, defined as average pain of 4 or greater on an 11-point (0-10) NRS in the past 24h
- Adequate trial of opioid medication, defined as a dose of at least 60 mg/day oral morphine equivalent or maximum tolerated dose, in the past 24h
- For patients with neuropathic component to pain: adequate trial of at least one adjuvant analgesic, defined as a daily dose of at least Amitriptyline 37.5mg, Duloxetine 30mg, Gabapentin 900mg, Pregabalin 150mg, Venlafaxine 60mg or equivalent (26), or maximum tolerated dose in the past 24h
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous adverse reaction to ketamine, lidocaine or other amide-type local anesthetics, midazolam
- Severe liver disease (Child Class B or C)
- SGPT or SGOT >5 times the upper limit of normal
- End stage kidney disease
- Serious cardiac comorbidity (e.g. unstable angina, poorly controlled hypertension or tachycardia, high-risk coronary vascular disease, symptomatic heart failure with NYHA class III-IV, history of heart block, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, Adams-Stokes syndrome)
- Elevated intracranial or intraocular pressure
- Pheochromocytoma or poorly controlled hyperthyroidism
- History of psychosis, schizophrenia or substance abuse
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Porphyria
- Life expectancy shorter than the duration of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion
|
Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing lidocaine 4 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30).
The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Active Placebo (Midazolam) Infusion
|
Participants receive two intravenous infusions, 7 days apart, containing midazolam 0.02mg/kg (using actual body weight, or ideal body weight if BMI >30).
The drugs are combined in a single, clear solution and administered via an electronic pump in an outpatient setting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in the Worst Pain During the Last 24 Hours on an 11-Point, 0 to 10, Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
|
Question 3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form, where 0 is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain.
|
Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Score of Pain Intensity of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
Assesses changes in patient-reported pain severity, including worst, least, average pain over the past 24 hours, and current pain ("pain right now").
|
Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
|
Change in the Proportion of Patients Achieving 2-Point Reduction on Worst and Least Pain of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
Evaluates the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement, defined as a ≥2-point reduction in worst and least pain on the Brief Pain Inventory.
|
Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
|
Change in the Score of the Interference Scale of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
Measures changes in the degree to which pain interferes with daily functioning, mood, sleep, work, and social activities.
|
Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
|
Change in total Oral Morphine Equivalents Consumption of the Previous Week
Time Frame: Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
Assesses changes in total opioid use by calculating the weekly oral morphine equivalent dose consumed by each participant.
|
Baseline (before the first LK or placebo infusion), before the second infusion (LK or placebo), and, one week after the second infusion (LK or placebo).
|
|
Immediate Analgesic Effect of the Infusion (LK or placebo)
Time Frame: Before the infusion and one hour after infusion termination.
|
Evaluated using question 6 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (pain right now)
|
Before the infusion and one hour after infusion termination.
|
|
Change in the Score of the Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
|
Measures changes in depressive symptom severity associated with treatment over the course of the study.
Beck Depression inventory is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression.
Scores range from 0 to 63, where higher score indicates more depressive symptoms.
|
Baseline (immediately before the first LK or placebo infusion) and one week after the second infusion.
|
|
Rating of Overall Improvement Using Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: one week after the second (LK or placebo) infusion
|
Assesses the patient's overall perceived improvement in pain and function following the treatment.
PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement.
Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
|
one week after the second (LK or placebo) infusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Konstantinos Kalimeris, Assoc Prof of Anesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Study Chair: Maria Riga, Assis Prof of Anesthesiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Study Chair: Ioannis Kotsantis, Assis Prof of Oncology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cohen SP, Bhatia A, Buvanendran A, Schwenk ES, Wasan AD, Hurley RW, Viscusi ER, Narouze S, Davis FN, Ritchie EC, Lubenow TR, Hooten WM. Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Intravenous Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain From the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the American Academy of Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jul;43(5):521-546. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000808.
- Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Rauschkolb C, Revicki DA, Rothman M, Schmader KE, Stacey BR, Stauffer JW, von Stein T, White RE, Witter J, Zavisic S. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
- Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
- Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain. 2001 May;92(1-2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00482-6.
- Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, Rostaing S, Lanteri-Minet M, Collin E, Grisart J, Boureau F. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain. 2004 Apr;108(3):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024.
- Mathias SD, Crosby RD, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Chung K. Estimating minimally important differences for the worst pain rating of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. J Support Oncol. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.004.
- van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007 Sep;18(9):1437-49. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm056. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
- Kandil E, Melikman E, Adinoff B. Lidocaine Infusion: A Promising Therapeutic Approach for Chronic Pain. J Anesth Clin Res. 2017 Jan;8(1):697. doi: 10.4172/2155-6148.1000697. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
- Orhurhu V, Orhurhu MS, Bhatia A, Cohen SP. Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):241-254. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185.
- Gewandter JS, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Baron R, Gastonguay MR, Gilron I, Katz NP, Mehta C, Raja SN, Senn S, Taylor C, Cowan P, Desjardins P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Hewitt DJ, Iyengar S, Jay GW, Kalso E, Kerns RD, Leff R, Leong M, Petersen KL, Ravina BM, Rauschkolb C, Rice ASC, Rowbotham MC, Sampaio C, Sindrup SH, Stauffer JW, Steigerwald I, Stewart J, Tobias J, Treede RD, Wallace M, White RE. Research designs for proof-of-concept chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1683-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.025. Epub 2014 May 24.
- Olkkola KT, Ahonen J. Midazolam and other benzodiazepines. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2008;(182):335-60. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74806-9_16.
- Bennett MI, Kaasa S, Barke A, Korwisi B, Rief W, Treede RD; IASP Taskforce for the Classification of Chronic Pain. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic cancer-related pain. Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001363.
- WHO Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537492/
- Bennett MI. Effectiveness of antiepileptic or antidepressant drugs when added to opioids for cancer pain: systematic review. Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):553-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216310378546. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Lee JT, Sanderson CR, Xuan W, Agar M. Lidocaine for Cancer Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;22(3):326-334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0257. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
- Mestdagh F, Steyaert A, Lavand'homme P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques. Curr Oncol. 2023 Jul 18;30(7):6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500.
- Zhu B, Zhou X, Zhou Q, Wang H, Wang S, Luo K. Intra-Venous Lidocaine to Relieve Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2019 Sep 18;10:954. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00954. eCollection 2019.
- Jonkman K, van de Donk T, Dahan A. Ketamine for cancer pain: what is the evidence? Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;11(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000262.
- Iacob E, Hagn EE, Sindt J, Brogan S, Tadler SC, Kennington KS, Hare BD, Bokat CE, Donaldson GW, Okifuji A, Junkins SR. Tertiary Care Clinical Experience with Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1245-1253. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx167.
- Striebel J, Ruppen W, Schneider T. Simultaneous application of lidocaine and ketamine during ambulatory infusion therapy: a retrospective analysis. Pain Manag. 2023 Sep;13(9):539-553. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0037. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
- Sugimoto M, Uchida I, Mashimo T. Local anaesthetics have different mechanisms and sites of action at the recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2003 Mar;138(5):876-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705107.
- Mystakidou K, Mendoza T, Tsilika E, Befon S, Parpa E, Bellos G, Vlahos L, Cleeland C. Greek brief pain inventory: validation and utility in cancer pain. Oncology. 2001;60(1):35-42. doi: 10.1159/000055294.
- Lee J, Currow D, Lovell M, Phillips JL, McLachlan A, Ritchie M, Brown L, Fazekas B, Aggarwal R, Seah D, Sheehan C, Chye R, Noble B, McCaffrey N, Aggarwal G, George R, Kow M, Ayoub C, Linton A, Sanderson C, Mittal D, Rao A, Prael G, Urban K, Vandersman P, Agar M. Lidocaine for Neuropathic Cancer Pain (LiCPain): study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study. BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 21;13(2):e066125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066125.
- Chu R, Umukoro N, Greer T, Roberts J, Adekoya P, Odonkor CA, Hagedorn JM, Olatoye D, Urits I, Orhurhu MS, Umukoro P, Viswanath O, Hasoon J, Kaye AD, Orhurhu V. Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion for the Management of Early Postoperative Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Controlled Trials. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2020 Oct 15;50(4 Suppl 1):216-259. doi: 10.64719/pb.4391.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Narcotic-Related Disorders
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Mental Disorders
- Substance-Related Disorders
- Chemically-Induced Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Cancer Pain
- Neoplasms
- Opioid-Related Disorders
- Organic Chemicals
- Heterocyclic Compounds
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring
- Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring
- Anilides
- Amides
- Aniline Compounds
- Amines
- Acetanilides
- Benzazepines
- Benzodiazepines
- Lidocaine
- Midazolam
Other Study ID Numbers
- 801/30-12-2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Opioid-Refractory Chronic Cancer-Related Pain
-
NycomedCompletedStandard Opioid Analgesic Treatment of Cancer-related Chronic Pain.
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Shirley Ryan AbilityLabActive, not recruitingBack Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Opioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Pain, Chronic | Back Injuries | Opioid-use Disorder | Pain, Back | Narcotic Use | Pain;Back Low;ChronicUnited States
-
Hudson MedicalEthos Research & DevelopmentTerminatedOpioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Pain, Chronic | Inflammation ChronicUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingChronic Pain | Opioid Dependence | Cancer SurvivorUnited States
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCAscend LearningCompletedPain | Pain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Withdrawal | Pain, Neuropathic | Opioid Abuse and AddictionUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityEnrolling by invitationOpioid Use Disorder | Chronic Non-Cancer PainSweden
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminatedOpioid-use Disorder | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityThe Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research & CharityRecruitingOpioid Use Disorder | Alcohol Use Disorder | Opioid Use | Pain, ChronicSweden
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompleted
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingChronic Back PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lidocaine and Ketamine Infusion
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ayfer Kaya GökCompletedAdenotonsillar Hypertrophy | Anesthesia Emergence DeliriumTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Aretaieion University HospitalRecruitingPain, Postoperative | Pain, Acute | Ketamine | Pain, Chronic | Magnesium | Pain, Neuropathic | Lidocaine | Central Nervous System Depressants | Analgesics | Neurotransmitter Agents | Analgesics, Non-narcoticGreece
-
Mohsen SaidinejadRecruitingSickle Cell Disease | Pain Management | Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease | Vaso-Occlusive Crises | Ketamine InfusionUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
Dilla UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Nausea and VomitingEthiopia
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedSurgery | Abdominal Cancer | Pelvic Cancer | Proinflammatory CytokinesEgypt
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkTerminatedComplex Regional Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingRefractory Chronic Migraine
-
Hospital dos LusíadasCompletedPostoperative Pain | Morbid Obesity | Bariatric Surgery | Opioid Free AnesthesiaPortugal