Pharmacist for Detecting Opioid Misuse

September 10, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Pharmacists in Detecting Opioid Misuse Using the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI): Survey in a Region in the South of France, Occitanie-Est

Opioid use is increasing in Western countries and is associated with harms as hospitalization, addiction and deaths(1). Community pharmacists interact frequently with patients, giving them the opportunity to identify and prevent the risk of prescribed opioid misuse. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the risk of prescribed opioids misuse in ambulatory patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) seen in community pharmacies.

Method: A questionnaire (including the Prescription Opioid Misuse POMI(2)) have been proposed to patients with opioid prescription by pharmacy students, in 86 pharmacies of Occitanie-Est, in April 2019. Eligible patients were adults with CNCP that consented to participate.

A total of 414 patients (62.4% women, mean age 58 ± 16.00) have been included. The main pains were spinal (37.3%) and osteoarticular (33.1%). The median visual analog scale (VAS) was 7 [IQR25-75: 5-8]. The prescribed opioids are mainly weak opioids (73.2%): paracetamol/tramadol (35%), paracetamol/codeine (17.4%), paracetamol/opium (16.8%). Strong opioids (32.6%) were oxycodone (11.95%), fentanyl (9%), and morphine (9%). The median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 40 mg/day [IQR25-75: 20-80].

POMI score was superior to 2/6 in 45.4% and superior to 4 in 16%. The main positive question were feel high (40.3%), take the opioid more often (39.3%), take more medication (36.6), and need to early renew opioid medication earlier (30.8%).

Patients with POMI score > 4 were younger (49 years versus 55.9; p<0.01), more urban (78.1% versus 69.2%; p=0.03), had higher VAS (7.3 versus 6.2; p<0.01), received higher median MME (112 mg versus 64.9 mg; p<0.01), and consumed more strong opioid (45.3% versus 27.3%; p=0.04).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

414

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34290
        • Uhmontpellier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with chronic non cancer pain

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • -Collection of the questionnaire in a community pharmacy of the area of investigation East-Occitania)
  • Patient over 18 years of age
  • Suffering from pain (CNCP) (> 3 months old)
  • Treated with weak or strong opioids

Exclusion criteria:

  • Collection of the questionnaire in a community pharmacy outside Eastern Occitania
  • Patient under 18 years of age
  • Suffering from acute pain (< 3 months old) or cancerous pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients with chronic non cancer pain
Patients with chronic non cancer pain, treated with opioids and having completed the POMi questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients with POMI test "Prescribed Opioid Misuse Index"> 2
Time Frame: 1 day
Patients with POMI test > 2 A score >2, may be associated with a risk of misuse of opioid medication. It is recommended to discuss this with the physician
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL20_0433

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non Cancer Pain

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Angola

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe