A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Anti-reflux Versus Standard Ureteral Stents on Male Sexual Function

February 10, 2026 updated by: Rong Wang

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of anti-reflux ureteral stents on improving erectile function and quality of life of patients with ureteral stents.

Methods and Populations: A total of 100 male patients who required ureteral stent placement after ureteroscopic lithotripsy were randomly assigned to two groups: those in Group T (n=50) received a standard double-J-stent, while those in Group A (n=50) underwent implantation with anti-reflux ureteral stent. Follow up for 8 weeks after surgery, including reproductive hormones and inflammation marks, Beck's depression scale, IIEF and statistics on the frequency of symptoms such as hematuria.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, 213000
        • Jintan Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male sexually active patients with unilateral ureteral calculi who underwent ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy and needed post-procedure stent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients were excluded if they included the following criteria: (1) age under 18 or over 50 years, (2) history of previous ureteral stenting, (3) bilateral stents, (4) moderate or severe ureteral stricture need long-term stenting (on regular exchange), (5) bladder pathology and overactive bladder, (6) symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, (7) moderate or severe urinary tract infection, (8) moderate or severe cardiovascular disease, hepatic dysfunction and diabetes, (9) previous use of selective alpha-1-blocker and/or antimuscarinic agent, (10) pre-op IIEF-5 ≤ 21.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
anti-reflux ureteral stent(INNOVEX, Shanghai, China)

Routine laser lithotripsy was done for the ureteral calculi, and a 6 Fr polyurethane DJ stent (Inlay Optima®, Bard Medical, Covington, GA) or INNOVEX, according to the groups, was inserted under fluoroscopic and cystoscopic guidance. Appropriate length was adjusted according to patient's height. Routine X-ray of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (KUB) was taken for all patients before home discharge to confirm the proper stent positioning. All patients are advised to avoid alcohol, until 4 weeks after surgery when the ureteral stent is removed in our institution.

General information such as preoperative age, body mass index, diameter of ureteral calculi, and degree of hydronephrosis, operation time were obtained. Follow up for 8 weeks after surgery, including reproductive hormones and inflammation marks, Beck's depression scale, IIEF and statistics on the frequency of symptoms such as hematuria.

Active Comparator: Group-T
standard double-J-stent

Routine laser lithotripsy was done for the ureteral calculi, and a 6 Fr polyurethane DJ stent (Inlay Optima®, Bard Medical, Covington, GA) or INNOVEX, according to the groups, was inserted under fluoroscopic and cystoscopic guidance. Appropriate length was adjusted according to patient's height. Routine X-ray of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (KUB) was taken for all patients before home discharge to confirm the proper stent positioning. All patients are advised to avoid alcohol, until 4 weeks after surgery when the ureteral stent is removed in our institution.

General information such as preoperative age, body mass index, diameter of ureteral calculi, and degree of hydronephrosis, operation time were obtained. Follow up for 8 weeks after surgery, including reproductive hormones and inflammation marks, Beck's depression scale, IIEF and statistics on the frequency of symptoms such as hematuria.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in IIEF score
Time Frame: Patients were followed up postoperatively according to a bi-weekly schedule, with clinical assessments at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks
Patients were followed up postoperatively according to a bi-weekly schedule, with clinical assessments at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • 1.Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-1320. doi:10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. 2.Arora A, Sane MS, Jadhao V, Maheshwari PN. Sexual dysfunction in Indian men undergoing Double J ureteral stenting following ureteroscopy-A prospective analysis. Andrologia. 2020;52(10):e13790. doi:10.1111/and.13790. 3.Mawhorter M, Streeper NM. Advances in ureteral stent technology. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(4):415-419. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001003. 4.Chew BH, Lange D. Advances in ureteral stent development. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26(3):277-282. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000275. 5.CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e081123. Published 2025 Apr 14. doi:10.1136/bmj-2024-081123. 6.Arena S, Iacona R, Impellizzeri P, et al. Physiopathology of vesico-ureteral reflux. Ital J Pediatr. 2016;42(1):103. Published 2016 Nov 29. doi:10.1186/s13052-016-0316-x. 7.Zhang L, Wu Y, Chen Y, et al. Triangular prismatic JJ stent does not cause more discomfort than tubular ones: a randomised controlled trial comparison. World J Urol. 2024;42(1):67. Published 2024 Feb 3. doi:10.1007/s00345-023-04758-5. 8.Wen KC, Li ZA, Liu JH, Zhang C, Zhang F, Li FQ. Recent developments in ureteral stent: Substrate material, coating polymer and technology, therapeutic function. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2024;238:113916. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2024.113916. 9.Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, et al. Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Eur Urol. 2010;57(5):804-814. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.020. 10.De Nunzio C, Roehrborn CG, Andersson KE, McVary KT. Erectile Dysfunction and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(4-5):352-363. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.004.2024;383(6683):eade8064. doi:10.1126/sci

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Zhangjiagang First Hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Male Sexual Function

Clinical Trials on Routine laser lithotripsy

Subscribe