Non-Conventional Microbiological Methods in the Diagnosis of Candidemia

February 18, 2026 updated by: Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

The Importance of Non-Conventional Microbiological Methods in the Diagnosis of Candidemia and the Host Cytokine Response to Different Fungal Pathogens

This study evaluates the diagnostic value of non-conventional microbiological methods for early detection of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adult hospitalized patients with suspected invasive fungal infection. Conventional blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis but has limited sensitivity and may delay initiation of targeted antifungal therapy.

The study investigates whether the combined use of serum biomarkers (1,3)-β-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies, and molecular detection of Candida DNA by PCR improves the diagnostic performance compared with conventional culture-based methods.

In addition, the study explores the host cytokine response associated with different Candida species and other fungal pathogens. The goal is to support the development of an optimized diagnostic algorithm for invasive fungal disease and improve clinical management of critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, particularly candidemia and invasive candidiasis, is essential for timely initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy and improvement of patient outcomes. Despite being considered the current diagnostic gold standard, blood culture has limited sensitivity and may remain negative in a substantial proportion of patients with invasive candidiasis. In addition, culture-based identification of fungal pathogens is time-consuming and may delay targeted treatment decisions.

To address these limitations, alternative diagnostic approaches have been developed, including detection of fungal cell wall biomarkers and molecular assays. Serum biomarkers such as (1,3)-β-D-glucan, mannan antigen, and anti-mannan antibodies may provide earlier indication of invasive Candida infection compared with blood culture. Molecular detection of Candida DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may also offer higher sensitivity and faster turnaround time.

This interventional diagnostic study evaluates the clinical and diagnostic utility of a combined non-conventional microbiological testing panel in adult patients with clinical suspicion of invasive/systemic fungal infection and risk factors for invasive fungal disease (e.g., ICU admission, central venous catheters, broad-spectrum antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, neutropenia, hemodialysis, mechanical ventilation, and Candida colonization).

Participants undergo routine blood culture testing for bacteria and fungi as part of standard clinical care. In addition, blood samples are collected for the following diagnostic tests:

Serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan

Mannan antigen and anti-mannan antibodies

PCR-based detection of Candida DNA from EDTA whole blood

Samples are processed according to routine laboratory procedures in participating microbiology laboratories. Blood culture-positive Candida isolates are identified and stored for further analyses. Participants are categorized into study groups based on blood culture results (Candida-positive blood culture group, bacterial-positive blood culture group, and blood culture-negative group). A healthy volunteer control group may be included for comparative purposes.

The primary objective is to determine whether the combined non-conventional diagnostic panel improves detection of candidemia/invasive candidiasis compared with conventional blood culture alone. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the diagnostic performance of individual biomarkers and PCR testing, assessment of the time to diagnosis, and analysis of host cytokine response patterns associated with different fungal pathogens.

The overall aim of the study is to support the development of an optimized diagnostic algorithm for invasive fungal disease, improve early detection, and reduce unnecessary or delayed antifungal treatment in critically ill patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult hospitalized patients (≥18 years)
  • Clinical suspicion of invasive/systemic fungal infection (suspected fungal sepsis)
  • Presence of risk factors for invasive fungal disease (e.g., ICU admission, central/peripheral venous catheters, parenteral nutrition, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy >3 days, corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, neutropenia, hemodialysis, mechanical ventilation, or Candida colonization)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • Insufficient blood sample for additional diagnostic testing
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent (if applicable)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-Conventional Diagnostic Testing Panel
Adult hospitalized patients with suspected invasive fungal infection underwent routine blood culture testing and additional non-conventional diagnostic testing including serum (1,3)-β-D-glucan, mannan/anti-mannan antibodies, and PCR-based detection of Candida DNA in blood samples, in order to evaluate the diagnostic utility of combined microbiological methods for early detection of candidemia.
Participants underwent routine blood culture testing for bacteria and fungi and additional non-conventional diagnostic testing for suspected invasive candidiasis, including serum (1,3)-beta-D-glucan, mannan antigen, anti-mannan antibodies, and PCR-based detection of Candida DNA from EDTA whole blood samples. The combined diagnostic panel was used to assess its potential value for earlier and improved detection of candidemia compared with conventional culture-based methods.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of the combined non-conventional testing panel for candidemia
Time Frame: At time of diagnostic work-up (baseline)
Sensitivity and specificity of the combined diagnostic panel (blood culture, Candida PCR, (1,3)-beta-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies) for detection of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adult hospitalized patients with suspected invasive fungal infection.
At time of diagnostic work-up (baseline)
Diagnostic performance of the combined non-conventional testing panel for candidemia
Time Frame: At time of diagnostic work-up during patient hospitalization
Sensitivity and specificity of the combined diagnostic panel (blood culture, Candida PCR, (1,3)-beta-D-glucan, mannan and anti-mannan antibodies) for detection of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adult hospitalized patients with suspected invasive fungal infection.
At time of diagnostic work-up during patient hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OI-CAND-DIAG-2015-01
  • KME_78_06_14 (Other Identifier: National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Candidemia

Clinical Trials on Candida Diagnostic Testing Panel

Subscribe