Endocare Repair Efficacy Skincare Products in the Use of Post-laser Treatment

February 24, 2026 updated by: Yanjun Dan, Huashan Hospital

A Single-center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Self-controlled Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Endocare Repairing Skincare Product in Skin Recovery After Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment .

To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Endocare Repair Efficacy Skincare Products in the Repair of Facial Skin Following Ablative Fractional Laser Treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-face (hemifacial) self-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 24 participants aged 21-37 years who underwent fractional CO2 laser treatment on both sides of the face. A skincare product containing SCA was applied to one side, and a placebo moisturizer was applied to the other side. Evaluations were conducted immediately after treatment and on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28 post-treatment. The primary outcome was the evaluation of microcolumn density under dermoscopy. Secondary outcomes included transepidermal water loss (TEWL), melanin index (MI), erythema index (EI), investigator global assessment (IGA), patient global assessment(PGA), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals aged 30-65 years;
  2. Candidates for ablative fractional laser treatment on the face;
  3. Agree to undergo photographic documentation before and after the ablative fractional laser procedure and during follow-up visits;
  4. Refrain from using other similar products (except facial cleansers) after ablative fractional laser treatment;
  5. Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. known hypersensitivity to product ingredients;
  2. active skin infections;
  3. history of keloid formation;
  4. immunosuppressive therapy and pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: SCA Side
One half of the face received the active product contained 40% secretion of SCA
One half of the face received the active product contained 40% secretion of SCA covering all lasered areas.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Side
The other half received an identical-appearing placebo cream (a basic moisturizer containing no SCA ingredients
The other half received an identical-appearing placebo cream (a basic moisturizer containing no SCA ingredients, but otherwise matching the active product in appearance and texture), covering all lasered areas.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microcolumn Density Under Dermoscopy
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
The primary outcome was the rate of re-epithelialization, assessed by the density of visible microcolumns which was examined using the Medicam®1000 dermoscopy system. This measure was complemented by a clinical healing score (0-3 scale for each side, where 0 = fully healed skin, 1 = fine pinpoint scaling, 2 = visible micro-crusts, 3 = obvious unhealed areas) assigned by a blinded dermatologist.
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
Melanin Index (MI)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
MI can detect pigment changes, allowing assessment of any PIH or other dyschromia resulting from the laser or differential healing. Higher MI indicates a prolonged post-laser reaction.
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
Erythema Index (EI)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.
EI quantifies redness to track the resolution of laser-induced erythema. Higher EI indicates a prolonged post-laser reaction.
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28

Key symptoms including erythema, edema, crusting, exudation and crusting were graded (with a score from 0-3) by the investigator at each visits.

Erythema:

0 - No redness

  1. - Light red or pink
  2. - Moderate redness
  3. - Bright red

Edema:

0 - No edema

  1. - Mild edema
  2. - Moderate edema
  3. - Severe diffuse edema

Exudation:

0 - No exudation

  1. - Mild exudation
  2. - Moderate exudation
  3. - Diffuse exudation

Crusting:

0 - No crusting

  1. - Thin crust
  2. - Moderately thick crust
  3. - Thick crust adherent to skin
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28
Patient Self-Assessments (PGA)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.
Patients rated tightness and burning in a scale of 0-3. 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.
Assessed immediately after treatment and at follow-up visits using a 0-10 VAS score. 10 being the highest pain.
Day 0 (before laser, immediately after laser and after applying product) and on post-laser days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 28.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-554

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because this single-center study does not have a formal data sharing infrastructure, and participants did not provide consent for public data sharing. Aggregated results may be reported in publications or upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laser Treatment

Clinical Trials on Active product contained 40% secretion of SCA

Subscribe