Validity of the Turkish Translation of the Modified JOA

May 10, 2026 updated by: Kadir Songur, Izmir Democracy University

Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Correlation Study of the Turkish Translation of the Modified JOA (Japanese Orthopedic Association) Cervical Myelopathy Score

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults and may lead to progressive motor, sensory, and autonomic impairment. Accurate and standardized assessment of neurological function is essential for clinical decision-making, prognostic evaluation, and comparison of treatment outcomes. The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score is one of the most widely used clinician-based outcome measures for evaluating neurological status in patients with DCM. Although the mJOA has been translated and validated in several languages, no validated Turkish version currently exists.

This prospective, cross-sectional validation study aims to culturally adapt the mJOA score into Turkish and evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical correlation in Turkish-speaking patients diagnosed with DCM. Adult patients (≥18 years) with clinically and radiologically confirmed DCM presenting to the outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurosurgery will be included. Previously obtained cervical magnetic resonance imaging will be reviewed retrospectively to determine myelomalacia levels, while clinical scales will be administered prospectively.

Construct validity will be assessed by examining correlations between the Turkish mJOA scores and the Neck Disability Index, as well as the Nurick grading system. Inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC [2,1]) between two independent evaluators, and test-retest reliability will be assessed in clinically stable patients after 7-14 days. Feasibility will be evaluated by recording the administration time and potential difficulties during application.

This study is expected to provide a valid and reliable Turkish version of the mJOA score, facilitating standardized assessment of DCM in Turkish clinical practice and enabling comparability with international research.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) represents the leading cause of non-traumatic spinal cord dysfunction in adults and is characterized by progressive neurological impairment involving upper and lower extremity motor function, sensory deficits, and sphincter dysfunction. Standardized and reliable clinical assessment tools are essential for determining disease severity, guiding treatment decisions, and ensuring comparability across clinical studies.

The Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score is a clinician-based functional assessment tool widely used to evaluate neurological status in patients with DCM. It assesses four domains: upper extremity motor function (0-5 points), lower extremity motor function (0-7 points), sensory function (0-3 points), and sphincter function (0-3 points), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 18. Lower scores indicate more severe neurological impairment. Although the mJOA score has undergone cross-cultural adaptation and validation in several languages, a culturally adapted and psychometrically validated Turkish version is currently unavailable.

This study is designed as a prospective, cross-sectional validation study aiming to perform the cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the mJOA score in patients with DCM. The translation process was conducted using a standardized forward-backward translation methodology in accordance with internationally accepted cross-cultural adaptation guidelines.

Participants will include adult patients (≥18 years) with clinically and radiologically confirmed DCM who present to the outpatient clinics of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurosurgery. Previously obtained cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans will be reviewed retrospectively to determine the level of cervical myelomalacia. Demographic and clinical variables, including age, sex, body mass index, symptom duration, treatment status, and affected side, will be recorded.

Construct validity will be evaluated by analyzing correlations between Turkish mJOA total and subdomain scores and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a validated Turkish instrument measuring cervical disability. Given that higher mJOA scores reflect better neurological function and higher NDI scores indicate greater disability, a significant negative correlation is hypothesized. Additionally, correlations between mJOA scores and the Nurick grading system will be assessed using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Differences in mJOA scores across categorized Nurick severity groups will be analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests.

Inter-rater reliability will be assessed in at least 50 patients by two independent evaluators (an experienced clinician and a trained clinician) using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC [2,1]). Test-retest reliability will be evaluated in clinically stable patients after a 7-14-day interval using ICC analysis. Floor and ceiling effects will be examined and considered present if more than 15% of participants achieve the lowest or highest possible scores.

Feasibility will be assessed by recording the time required to administer the Turkish mJOA and documenting any comprehension or implementation difficulties. No interventional procedures are involved in this study, and no adverse events are anticipated.

The results of this study are expected to establish a valid, reliable, and feasible Turkish version of the mJOA score, enabling standardized assessment of DCM severity in Turkish clinical practice and facilitating international research collaboration and outcome comparison.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • İzmir
      • Buca, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye), 35570
        • Recruiting
        • Izmir Democracy University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will include patients aged 18 years and older who have been diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy based on clinical and radiological evaluation and who have applied to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic and Neurosurgery Outpatient Clinic at İzmir Democracy University Buca Seyfi Demirsoy Education and Research Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • Patients diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy using clinical or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Cognitive competence to understand Turkish forms and scales

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal cord injury due to trauma, tumor, infection, inflammatory diseases, etc., pathologies
  • Previous cervical surgery
  • Severe cognitive impairment or communication problems that would prevent participation in the study
  • Subjects who were informed about the study but refused to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
degenerative cervical miyelopathy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score
Time Frame: Day 1
The Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score is a clinician-based functional assessment scale used to evaluate neurological function in patients with DSM. The scale covers four main areas: upper extremity motor function, lower extremity motor function, sensory function, and bladder (sphincter) function. Upper extremity motor function is scored from 0 to 5 points, lower extremity motor function from 0 to 7 points, sensory function from 0 to 3 points, and sphincter function from 0 to 3 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 18. Lower scores indicate more severe neurological dysfunction and poorer clinical status, while higher scores indicate better neurological function and clinical improvement. The scale is applied based on clinical examination findings and is a practical assessment tool that can be completed in a short time.
Day 1
Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: Day 1
The Neck Disability Index is an adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index for the cervical region and is a widely used 10-item questionnaire for assessing cervical dysfunction and neck pain. Each item is scored between 0 (no disability) and 5 (complete disability). The total score ranges from 0 to 50; a higher score indicates greater functional limitation. The questionnaire has established validity and reliability in Turkish.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nurick Grading System
Time Frame: Day 1
The Nurick grading system is a clinician-based classification system developed specifically to assess walking function and the level of independence in activities of daily living in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. The scale consists of six grades and is scored from 0 to 5. Grade 0 indicates the presence of root symptoms without myelopathy findings; Grades 1 and 2 indicate mild walking difficulties; Grade 3 indicates limited work capacity despite being able to walk independently; Grade 4 indicates inability to walk without assistance; and Grade 5 indicates dependence on a bed or chair. Lower grades indicate a milder clinical picture, while higher grades indicate more advanced neurological function loss.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the data contain potentially identifiable sensitive clinical information, and sharing was not covered in the original informed consent provided to participants. Additionally, institutional and national data protection regulations limit the transfer of raw, de-identified individual-level data outside the research team.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Compression

Subscribe