Nasal Swab Objective and Statistical Evaluation (NOSE Study) (Nasal Swab)

March 10, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Supply chain disruptions have led to shortages in test swabs which are used to collect respiratory samples. Lack of these test swabs can reduce a hospital or state's ability to test patients for COVID-19.

To address this shortage, many manufacturers, hospitals and individuals have designed non-traditional 3D printed swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis that could potentially meet demands for nasal swabs. However, questions regarding the safety and effectiveness of these swabs remain.

This study will provide additional, statistically supported evidence as to the safety and efficacy of novel swabs.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-site, non-inferiority study providing a comparison between the performance of traditional, standard of care (SoC) and alternative (ALT) nasal swabs. Nasal swabs and swabbing site of interest for this study is the nasopharynx (NP swab). The primary outcomes of this study are the rate of adverse events and the agreement in laboratory viral detection between SoC and ALT swabs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1179

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108-1532
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Employees and patients with recent (<2 weeks) COVID-19 diagnosis for themselves or a member of their home, or who are symptomatic with one or more COVID-19 symptoms are eligible.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic or COVID-19 positive (within the past 2 weeks)
  • Has a COVID-19 positive household member
  • Female and male Veterans or female and male VHA employees
  • Able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported history of frequent nosebleeds or a diagnosis of coagulopathy or any bleeding disorders
  • Unsuitability for mid-turbinate or nasopharyngeal swabbing due to prior surgery
  • Need for legally authorized representative for purpose of giving consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Standard of Care / Standard of Care
Initial cohort to identify the effect of order on swab result. Swab order (standard of care first) was set to preserve clinical test result in case there was an impact to swab order.
1st Alt Swab / Standard of Care
Evaluation of 1st alternatively sourced swab to the standard of care swab
2nd Alt Swab / Standard of Care
Evaluation of 2nd alternatively sourced swab to the standard of care swab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Day 1
Ability for the alternative swab to correctly predict a positive test result from the standard of care swab (1st swab)
Day 1
Specificity
Time Frame: Day 1
Ability for the alternative swab to correctly predict a negative test result from the standard of care swab (1st swab)
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epistaxis rate
Time Frame: Day 1
Rate of nosebleed, described as any detectable presence of blood on either swab
Day 1
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Day 1
Effect of order on the ability of a second swab, a standard of care swab, to correctly predict a positive test result from the first swab, also standard of care swab.
Day 1
Specificity
Time Frame: Day 1
Effect of order on the ability of a second swab, a standard of care swab, to correctly predict a negative test result from the first swab, also standard of care swab.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Iaquinto, PhD, VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • F3767-I
  • 1I01RX003767 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS Coronavirus 2 RT-PCR Testing

Subscribe