Mobile Shared Decision-Making Program for ICU Caregivers

March 9, 2026 updated by: CHIA-HUI MA

Effectiveness of a Mobile Technology Share Decision-Making Program for Critically Ill Patients' Caregiver in Intensive Care Unit.

By developing a smart mobile shared decision-making (SDM) model, this study aims to assist family members of critically ill end-stage patients in making appropriate decisions, enhance their decision quality, and evaluate the model's effectiveness

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study utilized a single-blind experimental design and was conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a medical center in northern Taiwan. The study participants were family members responsible for making end-of-life decisions for patients diagnosed with terminally ill critical conditions. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group using block randomization software. A total of 70 participants were enrolled, with 35 assigned to the experimental group and 35 to the control group

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • New Taipei City, Taiwan, 251
        • Ma Chia Hui

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-Patients diagnosed with terminal cancer or the eight designated non-cancer terminal diseases.

Patients determined to have a terminal and irreversible condition by two attending physicians.

Primary family decision-makers who are aged 20 years or older and provide informed consent to participate in the study.

Able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese and possess basic literacy skills.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cases where all family members reside abroad and have appointed an alternative healthcare proxy.

Those who have already received end-of-life decision-making consultations prior to ICU admission.

Patients who already have a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status annotated and have confirmed their end-of-life care preferences.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mobile technology devices
mHealth tools 7days

Phase 1 primarily involved scheduling the family meeting and providing decision aids. Family members used smartphones or tablet computers to download a mobile health application or scanned a QR code to access the content. They were instructed to complete reviewing the materials prior to the next phase.

Phase 2 took place within three days, during which the medical team and family members convened a family meeting in the ICU conference room. The team accompanied the family in watching an approximately four-minute video titled 'End-of-Life Options,' explained the details of end-of-life care, and assisted them in selecting appropriate care plans

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Usual Care
usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Conflict
Time Frame: 7days
To evaluate the changes in decisional conflict among family members."The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) was employed to measure participants' uncertainty in making choices. The scale comprises 16 items across five subscales, with a total score exceeding 37.5 indicating significant decisional conflict. The instrument has demonstrated robust internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78 - 0.92)."
7days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: MA C HUI, Mackay Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21MMHIS127e

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Terminally Ill Patients

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Mobile technology devices

Subscribe