A Study of How the Medicine Called "Etrasimod" Works in Children With the Gut Disease Called Ulcerative Colitis (ELEVATE-UCkids)

May 4, 2026 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2 OPEN-LABEL, SINGLE ARM STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND SAFETY OF ETRASIMOD IN PEDIATRIC PARTICIPANTS WITH MODERATELY TO SEVERELY ACTIVE ULCERATIVE COLITIS

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of etrasimod for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in pediatrics participants (≥ 2 years up to < 12 years of age). Participants who will complete the total 52-week treatment period will have the opportunity to continue in a Long-Term Extension (LTE) Period of up to 4 years (5 years after study enrollment).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Available outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V4G2
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Québec - Université Laval
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen
    • Saxony
      • Leipzig, Saxony, Germany, 04103
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
      • Kumamoto, Japan, 861-8520
        • Recruiting
        • Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan, 113-8431
        • Recruiting
        • Juntendo University Hospital
    • Saitama
      • Saitama-shi, Saitama, Japan, 330-8777
        • Recruiting
        • Saitama Prefectural Children's Medical Center
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-600
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Gyncentrum sp. z o.o. NZOZ Holsamed - oddział Libero
    • Masovian Voivodeship
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland, 04-501
        • Recruiting
        • Medical Network Spółka z o.o. WIP Warsaw IBD Point Profesor Kierkuś
      • Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland, 00-189
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centrum Zdrowia MDM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Have a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) that is moderately to severely active Participants are permitted to be receiving a therapeutic dose of select UC therapies

Exclusion criteria:

Severe extensive colitis Diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis or the presence or history of a fistula consistent with CD Diagnosis of microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, or infectious colitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Etrasimod
Etrasimod by mouth, once daily up to 52 weeks
Once daily by mouth
Other Names:
  • APD334

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and percent of enrolled participants with clinical remission based on Modified Mayo Score (MMS) at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point (SF= 1 or 0), ES=1 or 0 and RB=0. Mayo score: instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and percent of enrolled participants with clinical remission based on MMS at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point (SF= 1 or 0), ES=1 or 0 and RB=0. Mayo score: instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 12
Number and percent of enrolled participants with clinical response based on MMS score components at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Clinical response was defined as a ≥2-point and ≥30% decrease from baseline in MMS, and a ≥1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore ≤ 1. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 12
Number and percent of enrolled participants with clinical response based on MMS score components at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Clinical response was defined as a ≥2-point and ≥30% decrease from baseline in MMS, and a ≥1-point decrease from baseline in RB subscore or an absolute RB subscore ≤ 1. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 52
Number and percent of enrolled participants endoscopic improvement based on MMS score components at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Endoscopic improvement defined as ES ≤1 (excluding friability). These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 12
Number and percent of enrolled participants endoscopic improvement based on MMS score components at Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Endoscopic improvement defined as ES ≤1 (excluding friability). These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 52
Number and percent of enrolled participants Clinical remission at Week 12 and who had not been receiving corticosteroids for ≥2 weeks immediately prior to Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point (SF= 1 or 0), ES=1 or 0 and RB=0. Number of weeks off corticosteroids prior to week 12 visit will be used to determine end point. Mayo score: instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 12
Number and percent of enrolled participants Clinical remission at Week 52 and who had not been receiving corticosteroids for ≥12 weeks immediately prior to Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 points or lower, with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point (SF= 1 or 0), ES=1 or 0 and RB=0. Number of weeks off corticosteroids prior to week 52 visit will be used to determine end point. Mayo score: instrument designed to measure disease activity of ulcerative colitis. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 52
Number and percent of enrolled participants Symptomatic remission at all time points up to Week 52
Time Frame: Week 52
Symptomatic remission was defined as SF subscore = 0 or 1 and an RB subscore = 0. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Week 52
Number and percent of enrolled participants Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) clinical remission from baseline to Week 260
Time Frame: Baseline, through Week 260
Clinical remission by PUCAI is defined as a score <10. These assessments will be conducted at each visit. These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Baseline, through Week 260
Number and percent of enrolled participants PUCAI clinical response from baseline to Week 260
Time Frame: Baseline, through Week 260
Clinical response by PUCAI is defined as a score ≥ 20 point reduction from baseline. These assessments will be conducted at each visit.These results will be summarized by the number and percentage of participants achieving the response, along with a two-sided 95% CI.
Baseline, through Week 260
Number and percentage of participants reporting a positive taste/palatability score
Time Frame: Week 2
The responses to taste acceptability questionnaire on etrasimod tablets and granules will be summarized using count and percentage for SAS
Week 2
Number and percentage of participants reporting a positive taste/palatability score
Time Frame: Week 12
The responses to taste acceptability questionnaire on etrasimod tablets and granules will be summarized using count and percentage for SAS
Week 12
Change from baseline in Z-Scores height and weight
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 260
These assessments will be conducted at each visit. The values and change from baseline will be summarized using number of observations, mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values by visit for SAS.
Baseline through Week 260
Number of Participants with Treatment Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs), including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation.
Time Frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Relatedness to etrasimod was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No). Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category.
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention
Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Findings in Laboratory Examinations
Time Frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes); Hepatobiliary biochemistry: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Total Bilirubin ; Renal Function Tests: Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine, Creatinine Kinase, Uric Acid ; Electrolytes: Sodium, Potassium; Glucose; Urine analysis: (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity )[pH], Specific gravity. Clinically significant laboratory abnormality findings were based on investigator discretion.
Baseline up to 28 days after last dose of study intervention
Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Change in Vital Signs
Time Frame: Baseline up to week 260
Following vital sign parameters were assessed: diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, temperature and body weight. Number of participants with clinically significant change in any vital sign parameter compared to baseline were reported. Clinically significant change in vital signs criteria were based on investigator's discretion.
Baseline up to week 260
Plasma concentration verses time of study intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2 and 4
Samples collected prior to daily dosing of study intervention for measurement of plasma concentrations of etrasimod will be analyzed using a validated analytical method in compliance with applicable SOPs.
Baseline, Weeks 2 and 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 10, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 20, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C5041018
  • APD334-208 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
  • 2025-523100-77-00 (Registry Identifier: CTIS (EU))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colitis, Ulcerative

Clinical Trials on Etrasimod

Subscribe