Influence of Lung Volume Optimization Maneuver on Cardiac Output and Lung Compliance in Ventilated Children With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Surgical Repair (ILOCO-CHD)

April 26, 2026 updated by: Jan Clausen, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Influence of Lung Volume Optimization Maneuver on Cardiac Output and Lung Mechanics in Children With Congenital Heart Disease

The aim of this randomized interventional multi-center clinical trial is to determine whether a standardized lung volume optimization maneuver (LVOM), including PEEP titration, improves outcomes in children undergoing biventricular repair for congenital heart disease (CHD) with cardiopulmonary bypass.

The primary hypothesis is that optimizing end-expiratory lung volume through a standardized PEEP titration maneuver improves cardiac performance and lung function.

Secondary objectives are to evaluate whether this strategy reduces duration of mechanical ventilation, improves hemodynamics and ventilation-perfusion matching, and decreases the need for vasopressor support.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with interruption of ventilation, leading to atelectasis, reduced end-expiratory lung volume, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), which may impair right ventricular (RV) performance and overall cardiac output.

This study investigates whether a structured LVOM strategy can mitigate these effects by improving lung mechanics and cardiopulmonary interactions.

Specific Aims

Aim 1:

To quantify changes in hemodynamics and lung mechanics induced by LVOM under standardized postoperative (closed-chest) conditions.

Aim 2:

To compare individualized PEEP titration versus standard ventilation in terms of effects on hemodynamics and lung mechanics, while maintaining consistent tidal volume targets across groups.

Hypotheses

LVOM will improve lung mechanics and hemodynamic parameters. No significant between-group differences are expected prior to intervention. After PEEP titration, the intervention group will demonstrate superior cardiopulmonary function at moderate PEEP levels, reflecting the U-shaped relationship between lung volume and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).

Scientific Rationale

Cardiopulmonary bypass commonly results in atelectasis and loss of end-expiratory lung volume, contributing to increased PVR and RV afterload, with subsequent reduction in cardiac output.

Adult studies suggest that lung volume optimization through PEEP titration after CPB can improve cardiac index and RV performance. However, prospective pediatric data evaluating the interaction between ventilatory strategy, lung mechanics, and hemodynamics remain limited.

Given the central role of the right ventricle in coupling pulmonary and systemic circulation, optimizing lung volume may reduce RV afterload and improve overall cardiac performance.

Importantly, pulmonary vascular resistance follows a U-shaped relationship with lung volume, with increased resistance at both low (atelectasis) and high (overdistension) lung volumes. Individualized PEEP titration may therefore identify an optimal range that minimizes PVR while preserving hemodynamic stability.

This study addresses a critical gap by systematically evaluating cardiopulmonary interactions under contemporary ventilation strategies in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • German Heart Center of the Charité

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion Criteria
  • congenital heart disease
  • surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion Criteria:

  • single ventricle physiology
  • ECMO/VAD
  • <36weeks of gestational age
  • chronic lung disease
  • Endotracheal tube leak > 15%
  • lack of informed consent from parents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
This group receives so called standard of care. This includes relatively low levels of PEEP (5cmH2O in case of planned surgery) and no standardized PEEP titration.
Patients will receive pressure controlled ventilation with target tidal volume of 6ml/kg and PEEP of 5cmH2O. Driving pressures are limited to 15cmH2O. No LVOM will be applied.
Experimental: Treatment
This group receives an individual lung volume optimization maneuver with PEEP titration. PEEP titration is performed while monitoring lung mechanics and EIT indices of overdistension and collapse and regional tidal volume distribution to optimize end-expiratory lung volume and find final "best PEEP". If possible lung perfusion will be assessed with EIT to evaluate V/Q-matching.
PEEP titration (incremental/decremental) will be performed at the end of surgery to optimize lung volume and find levels of PEEP corresponding to the "best" lung compliance and "best" compromise of overdistension and collapse and "best" homogenization of tidal volume distribution assessed with EIT. PEEP levels will be applied based on individual response of patients' lung mechanics and EIT measures. Tidal volume will be kept constant at 6ml/kg in cases and controls. Driving pressures will be limited to 15cmH2O. Balance of CO2 will be guaranteed by adjusting respiratory rate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac Index (L/min/BSA)
Time Frame: perioperatively
assessed by using POCUS
perioperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lung mechanics
Time Frame: perioperatively
lung compliance (ml/cmH2O/kg)
perioperatively
right ventricular performance
Time Frame: perioperatively
TAPSE PAAT Strain
perioperatively
ventilation distribution
Time Frame: perioperatively
EIT
perioperatively
lung perfurision
Time Frame: perioperatively
EIT
perioperatively
dead space fraction
Time Frame: perioperatively
pulmonary dead-space fraction (Vd/Vt)
perioperatively
avDO2
Time Frame: perioperatively
difference in arteriovenous oxygen content
perioperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Children

Clinical Trials on Standard Care (in control arm)

Subscribe