Dynamic Networks in Depression Treatment: Mechanisms of Change in Pharmacological, Psychological and Combined Treatment of Depression (DYNDET)

March 18, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Ulrich Stangier, Goethe University

Veränderungen Dynamischer Symptom-Netzwerke Unter Pharmakologischer, Psychotherapeutischer Und Kombinierter Behandlung Bei Depression (DYNDET)

This study investigates how antidepressant pharmacotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or their combination modulate the temporal dynamics and connectivity of depressive symptom networks. Using intensive longitudinal ecological momentary assessment data, the trial examines treatment-specific changes in symptom interactions.

By applying network-based analytic approaches, the study aims to elucidate differential and potentially complementary mechanisms of change across treatment modalities. Findings may contribute to more informed and individualized treatment strategies for major depressive disorder.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Depressive disorder (mild to moderate symptom severity)
  2. 18-65 years
  3. must own a smartphone with internet access

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. severe depressive episode
  2. acute suicidality,
  3. bipolar disorder,
  4. substance use disorder
  5. psychotic depression
  6. severe medical or neurological illness
  7. insufficient german language skills
  8. concurrent psychotherapeutic treatment
  9. conditions that may interfere with fMRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Psychopharmacological treatment
Participants receive psychopharmacological treatment according to guideline-based clinical practice.
Participants will receive outpatient treatment with escitalopram. Treatment will be initiated at 5 mg/day for three days and increased to a target dose of 10 mg/day. Clinical re-evaluations will take place after two and four weeks. In case of insufficient clinical response, the dose may be increased to 15 mg/day in accordance with guideline recommendations.
Experimental: Psychotherapeutical group treatment
Participants receive manualized cognitive-behavioral group psychotherapy.
Consisting of a group treatment of the same time frame as the psychopharmacological treatment and includes the following components: psychoeducation, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, social problem-solving, homework assignments and relapse prevention.
Experimental: Combined intervention
Combination of the aforementioned psychopharmacological and cognitive-behavioral group treatment.
Participants will receive outpatient treatment with escitalopram. Treatment will be initiated at 5 mg/day for three days and increased to a target dose of 10 mg/day. Clinical re-evaluations will take place after two and four weeks. In case of insufficient clinical response, the dose may be increased to 15 mg/day in accordance with guideline recommendations.
Consisting of a group treatment of the same time frame as the psychopharmacological treatment and includes the following components: psychoeducation, behavioral activation, cognitive restructuring, social problem-solving, homework assignments and relapse prevention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structure of symptom networks via multilevel vector autoregressive modeling (mlVAR)
Time Frame: From Baseline (2 weeks) to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Planned network intervention analyses will focus on intervention-specific effects at the symptom-network level. We will describe whether each of the three interventions shows differential direct associations with specific depressive symptoms or processes, operationalized as edges between intervention indicators and symptom/process nodes. We will also examine whether the interventions differ in their pattern of indirect associations within the network, that is, whether changes in some symptoms appear to be associated with downstream changes in other symptoms or processes. In addition, we will compare centrality metrics of depressive symptoms across interventions and over time.
From Baseline (2 weeks) to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Observer rated scale of depression severity. Total score ranging from 0 to 51, with lower scores indicating less severity of depressive symptoms.
From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Observer rated scale of depression severity. Total score ranging from 0 to 60, with lower scores representing less severity of depressive symptoms.
From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology clinician (IDS-C)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Observer rated scale of depression severity. Total score ranging from 0 to 84, with lower scores indicating less severity of depressive symptoms.
From Inclusion to immediately Post-Treatment (11 weeks)
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS)
Time Frame: Immediately at Inclusion
Observer rated scale of social and functional impairment. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing a higher level of functioning.
Immediately at Inclusion
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Short Form (PANAS-SF)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self report scale of positive and negative affect. Scores can range from 10 to 50 for both subscales (positive affect and negative affect). Higher scores indicate a higher level of either positive or negative affect
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self-rating scale for repetitive negative thinking. The score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate a higher level of repetitive negative thinking
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-2)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self-rated measure of psychological flexibility. Score ranging from 7 to 49. Higher total scores indicate less flexibility, while lower total scores indicate more flexibility.
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self-report scale of social support. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Couples Satisafction Index (CSI-4)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self-report scale of relationship satisfaction in couples with a score range from 0 to 21. Higher scores are associated with higher levels of relationship satisfaction.
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D)
Time Frame: From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)
Self-rating scale of cognitive dysfunction. Score ranging from 0 to 80. Higher scores representing higher cognitive dysfunction.
From Inclusion to immediately Mid-Treatment (7 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Igor Nenadic, Prof. Dr., Philipps University Marburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-2718

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie reported results will be shared after deidentification.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression - Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Psychopharmacological treatment

Subscribe