PRAY.COM for Mental Health and Well-Being Among University Students

March 23, 2026 updated by: Jennifer Huberty, Fit Minded

A Faith-Based Mobile Application for Mental Health and Well-Being Among University Students: A Single-Arm Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness Trial

This single-arm feasibility and preliminary effectiveness trial examines PRAY.COM, a faith and prayer mobile application (app), among university students. Enrolled students at Regent University are asked to use the app for at least 10 minutes per day for 8 weeks. Feasibility is assessed by app demand (≥70% weekly use benchmark) and acceptability (≥75% satisfaction benchmark). Preliminary effectiveness is assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks for mental health (depressive symptoms, anxiety, stress), well-being (loneliness, sense of purpose and meaning), and academic outcomes (time management confidence, school-life balance satisfaction, confidence managing academic challenges, feeling overwhelmed by academic responsibilities, classes missed due to mental health, difficulty concentrating, frequency of mental health negatively impacting academic performance, and difficulty completing coursework). Three analysis groups are examined: completers with confirmed objective app engagement (primary), all 8-week completers (secondary), and all enrolled participants using last observation carried forward imputation (tertiary).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study is a single-arm feasibility and preliminary effectiveness trial conducted with currently enrolled students at Regent University. Participants are recruited via a university-wide email listserv and are asked to use the PRAY.COM app, a faith-based mobile application delivering Daily Prayer, Meditative Prayers, Scripture Readings, Bedtime Bible Stories, Podcasts, Sermons, a Bible in a Year program, and Pray AI (an AI-powered faith companion), for at least 10 minutes per day over 8 weeks. No instructions are given regarding which specific features or content to engage with. Upon completing the baseline survey, participants receive a complimentary premium PRAY.COM subscription for the duration of the study.

Feasibility is assessed across demand and acceptability domains. Demand is operationalized as the percentage of participants reporting at least weekly app use with a benchmark of ≥70%. Acceptability is operationalized as the percentage of participants reporting satisfaction (satisfied or very satisfied) with a benchmark of ≥75%. Additional feasibility indicators include perceived appropriateness for students and intent to continue use. Objective app usage data are obtained directly from PRAY.COM to complement self-reported engagement.

Preliminary effectiveness outcomes are assessed using validated measures at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Mental health outcomes include depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress (DASS-9; 3 items each, 0-3 scale), and loneliness (UCLA-3; 3 items, 1-3 scale). Well-being outcomes include sense of purpose and meaning (2 items adapted from the Claremont Purpose Scale, 1-5 scale). Academic outcomes include time management confidence, school-life balance satisfaction, confidence managing academic challenges, feeling overwhelmed by academic responsibilities, classes missed due to mental health, difficulty concentrating, frequency of mental health negatively impacting academic performance, and difficulty completing coursework (8 investigator-developed items).

Statistical approach: Pre-post changes are analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with normality of change scores assessed via Shapiro-Wilk tests. Effect sizes are calculated as Cohen's d (mean change / SD of change scores). Three analysis groups are examined: 1) the primary per-protocol sample of 8-week completers with confirmed objective app engagement (i.e., having at least one recorded app session exceeding one second); 2) a secondary analysis of all 8-week completers regardless of objective engagement status; and 3) a tertiary full-enrollment analysis using last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation as a conservative lower-bound estimate, with multiple imputation as a sensitivity check. Additional analyses examine dose-response relationships, subgroup differences (age, sex, race/ethnicity, student type), and baseline severity effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Westlake Village, California, United States, 91361
        • PRAY.COM (Online Only)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently enrolled university student with a corresponding institutional email address (@edu)
  • 18 years of age or older
  • US resident
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Willing to complete brief surveys including questions related to faith and faith-based practices
  • Willing to download a faith and prayer mobile application onto a smartphone or tablet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not a currently enrolled university student or does not have a corresponding institutional email address
  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Not a US resident
  • Unable to read or understand English
  • Not willing to complete surveys related to faith and faith-based practices
  • Not willing to download a faith and prayer mobile application

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRAY.COM App
Participants were asked to used the PRAY.COM mobile app for at least 10 minutes per day for 8 weeks, with assessments at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.
PRAY.COM is a nondenominational, Bible-based faith and prayer mobile application delivering daily prayers, guided meditations, scripture readings, bedtime stories, podcasts, and worship music. Participants were instructed to use the app for at least 10 minutes per day for 8 weeks but were not given specific instructions regarding which features to engage with.
Other Names:
  • PRAY.COM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability (satisfaction)
Time Frame: Measured at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Percentage of participants reporting satisfied or very satisfied; benchmark ≥75%
Measured at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Demand
Time Frame: From enrollment to 4 and 8 weeks
Percentage of participants reporting at least weekly app use; benchmark ≥70%
From enrollment to 4 and 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived appropriateness
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Percentage rating PRAY.COM as very or extremely appropriate for students
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Intent to continue use
Time Frame: 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Percentage reporting likely or very likely to continue using PRAY.COM after the study
4 weeks and 8 weeks
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-9). Scores range from 0-9 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Anixety
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-9). Scores range from 0-9 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Measured by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-9). Scores range from 0-9 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Loneliness
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3). Total scores range from 3-9, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Sense of Purpose and Meaning
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Measured by two adapted items from the Claremont Purpose Scale. Scores range from 2-10 with higher scores indicating greater meaning and purppose.
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Time Management Confidence
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item with a 5-point scale (0=not at all confident to 4=extremely confident)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
School-life balance satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item with a 5-point scale (1=very dissatisfied to 5=very satisfied)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Confidence managing academic challenges
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item with a 5-point scale (0=not at all confident to 4=extremely confident)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Feeling overwhelmed
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item; 6-point scale (0=never to 5=daily)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Difficulty concentrating
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item; 5-point scale (0=not difficult at all to 4=extremely difficult)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Classes missed due to mental health
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item; 5-point scale (0=0 to 4=4 or more)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Mental health negatively impacted academics
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item; 5-point scale (0=never to 4=always)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Difficulty completing coursework
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks
Investigator-developed item; 6-point scale (0=never to 4=daily)
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Huberty, PhD, Fit Minded

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be publicly shared. De-identified data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health

Clinical Trials on PRAY.COM Mobile Application

Subscribe