Comparison of Blood Loss Between Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems in Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty (FEMFIX)

March 19, 2026 updated by: Clinique du Pré

Comparison of Blood Loss Between Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems in Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) yields excellent results. To perform the procedure, the surgeon must make certain decisions, including the choice of fixation method for the femoral implant.

This surgery, considered to carry a risk of bleeding, therefore exposes the patient :

  • to complications: heart attacks, strokes...
  • to mortality
  • to transfusion: specific risks, cost, length of hospital stay
  • to anemia: fatigue, longer recovery time The influence of the femoral fixation method on bleeding and blood loss is often debated, but the literature on the subject is very limited.

Our hypothesis is that the method of femoral fixation in THA influences bleeding and blood loss, with a benefit for cemented fixations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Gien, France, 45500
        • Clinique Jeanne d'Arc
        • Contact:
      • Le Mans, France, 72000
        • Clinique Du Pre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient needed a total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgery on the affected hip
  • Preoperative anemia
  • Femoral neck fracture
  • Patient with a contraindication to tranexamic acid
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cemented fixation
Total hip replacement with cemented fixation
Total hip arthroplasty performed using cemented fixation of the prosthetic components. A femoral stem and acetabular cup are implanted and secured to the bone using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. This technique provides immediate mechanical stability and is commonly used in patients with reduced bone quality, such as elderly individuals or those with osteoporosis. The procedure aims to relieve pain, restore joint function, and allow early weight-bearing following surgery.
Active Comparator: Non-cemented fixation
Total hip replacement with non-cemented fixation
Total hip arthroplasty performed using uncemented (press-fit) fixation of the prosthetic components. The femoral stem and acetabular cup are implanted without cement and rely on biological fixation through bone ingrowth into the implant surface. Initial stability is achieved by press-fit insertion, with long-term fixation depending on osseointegration. This technique is often preferred in younger or more active patients with good bone quality. The procedure aims to relieve pain, restore mobility, and ensure durable implant fixation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total blood loss
Time Frame: The day of surgery
Mercuriali formula : Estimated total blood volume × [Preoperative hematocrit (Ht) - Ht on day 5] + volume of red blood cells transfused
The day of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
occurrence of a blood transfusion
Time Frame: between day 0 and day 5 after surgery
Occurrence of perioperative blood transfusion, defined as the administration of any allogeneic or autologous red blood cell units during surgery or within the postoperative hospitalization period.
between day 0 and day 5 after surgery
Surgical revision for hematoma
Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 5 after surgery
Occurrence of surgical reintervention due to postoperative hematoma at the operated hip site. This includes any return to the operating room for evacuation of a hematoma within the defined postoperative follow-up period.
Between day 0 and day 5 after surgery
Clinical score Postel Merle d'Aubigné
Time Frame: 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surhery
Assessment of hip function using the Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score, which evaluates pain, mobility, and walking ability. Each domain is scored from 0 to 6, with a total score ranging from 0 to 18, where higher scores indicate better function.
2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surhery
Harris Hip score
Time Frame: 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery
Assessment of hip function using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), a clinician-based outcome measure evaluating pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function.
2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery
Oxford score
Time Frame: 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery
a validated questionnaire consisting of 12 items related to pain and daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, with a total score ranging from 0 to 48, where higher scores indicate better outcomes.
2 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent Abane, MD, Clinique Du Pre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Clinical Trials on Total hip replacement with cemented fixation

Subscribe