Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Before Surgery vs Surgery Alone for UTUC: A Randomized Trial

March 19, 2026 updated by: Changhai Hospital

Comparative Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Immediate Nephroureterectomy in the Treatment of Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of two treatment options for patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). One group will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by surgery (radical nephroureterectomy), while the other group will undergo surgery without chemotherapy. The primary goal is to assess the pathological response to treatment, focusing on how much the tumor shrinks before surgery. The trial will also evaluate the safety of the treatments, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. This study will help determine whether adding chemotherapy before surgery improves outcomes for patients with high-risk UTUC.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200090
        • Changhai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).
  2. Clinically non-metastatic UTUC (N≤1, M0) based on imaging (CT/MRI).
  3. Planned for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
  4. ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
  5. Sufficient renal function (GFR ≥45 mL/min) and able to tolerate chemotherapy with cisplatin.
  6. Age ≥18 years.
  7. Informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Imaging shows ≥N2 disease or metastatic disease (M1).
  2. History of invasive or lymph node-positive UTUC or invasive disease in the contralateral upper tract in the last 2 years.
  3. Single kidney or contraindication to cisplatin.
  4. Currently participating in other interventional clinical trials.
  5. History of non-urothelial malignancies (except treated skin basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ).
  6. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  7. Any other medical condition deemed inappropriate by the treating physician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NAC+RNU

Patients in the experimental group will receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin before undergoing surgery. The chemotherapy regimen consists of:

Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m², administered on Day 1 and Day 8 of each 21-day cycle. Cisplatin: 70 mg/m², administered on Day 2 of each 21-day cycle. This treatment will be repeated for 3 to 4 cycles. The goal of this chemotherapy is to shrink the tumor and improve the chances of a successful surgery. After completing the chemotherapy, patients will undergo radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), a surgery to remove the kidney and ureter affected by cancer, within 6 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) of the last chemotherapy cycle. This approach is designed to evaluate if chemotherapy before surgery can improve pathological response and long-term survival outcomes.

No Intervention: RNU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological Response Rate
Time Frame: 6 weeks after surgery
Proportion of patients with ypT1N0 or lower after surgery in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy + partial nephrectomy group compared to the direct partial nephrectomy group.
6 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chemotherapy Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame: During chemotherapy and post-surgery follow-up
Incidence, severity, and clinical management of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) according to CTCAE v5.0.
During chemotherapy and post-surgery follow-up
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
Time from surgery to death from any cause.
24 months after surgery
Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS)
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
Time from surgery to death due to UTUC.
24 months after surgery
Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)
Time Frame: 24 months after surgery
Time from surgery to first recurrence of UTUC.
24 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 15, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CH-UTUC NAC vs NNAC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

  1. Data Privacy and Ethical Considerations: Due to the sensitive nature of the IPD, which contains private health information, sharing of this data may pose privacy risks and violate regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA. The study's ethical approval also restricts public access to IPD to safeguard patient confidentiality.
  2. Data Security: To ensure the protection of patient information and prevent potential data breaches, access to the IPD will be strictly limited to the internal research team.
  3. Lack of Data Sharing Agreement: While we support data sharing, a formal agreement with external researchers or public repositories has not been established for this study at present.
  4. Group-level Analysis: The primary analyses of this study are based on aggregated group data rather than individual patient-level data. As such, sharing IPD does not significantly impact the reproducibility or verification of the study's results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trials on Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine + Cisplatin Chemotherapy

Subscribe