- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07494422
A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term Care. Prevalence Study Among Staff in Long-term Care. (APPEAL)
Globally, studies indicated that 16% of community dwelling older adults have been exposed to some form of abuse in the past 12 months. Furthermore, a global meta-analysis about AOP in long-term care facilities used staff as respondents and found that the pooled estimate of overall self-reported perpetration of staff to resident abuse during the past 12 months was 64.2% (95% CI 53.3-73.9%). Similar findings was also reported in a study from Norway in which the overall prevalence of observed staff-to-resident abuse was 76% and 60% of respondents report self-perpetration of abusive acts during the past 12 months. Resident-to-resident aggression was even more common, observed by 88% of respondents.
This study is part of the Swedish national research program APPEAL (A Path to Prevention of Elder Abuse in Long-term care) with the long-term goal to co-create an intervention for abuse of older people (AOP) in nursing homes together with stakeholders, i.e., staff, managers, care recipients and relatives.
Study design and data collection:
A cross-sectional study design will be used with slightly different data collection modes.
- Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden. Data will be collected through a digital survey. Data will be combined with available register data from Statistics Sweden, including for example sex, age, civil state and occupational related data.
- Workplace sample. Sweden has 290 Municipalities. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the municipalities based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. In the randomization process, geographical location of the municipalities has been considered to assure national representativeness, meaning that in case several municipalities in the same geographical region were selected a new randomization was conducted. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization. Data will be collected through a digital questionnaire. Organizations will be encouraged to set a side time at a staff meeting for completing the questionnaire. If this is not possible, a link to the questionnaire will be sent out by e-mail. Data will be collected anonymously.
Material:
The questionnaire used in the previously mentioned Norwegian study about AOP in long-term care facilities has been translated and culturally adapted. In addition, items about background characteristics of respondents as well as risk factors for AOP on both an individual and system level are included, e.g., workload and perceived support at the workplace and ageist attitudes.
Analysis:
Primary outcomes will be proportion of staff reporting different types of abuse (psychological, physical, sexual, financial abuse and neglect) in different relational contexts, i.e., self-perpetrated, staff-to-resident and relative-to resident abuse, and in long-term care facilities resident-to-resident abuse.
Secondary outcome will be staff reported own exposure to different forms of abuse at the workplace, including by residents, co-workers, relatives and managers.
Logistic regression analysis will be used to investigate associations between reporting different forms of abuse and potentially explanatory factors.
Study Overview
Status
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Johanna Simmons
- Phone Number: +46 (0) 13 281000
- Email: Johanna.simmons@liu.se
Study Locations
-
-
-
Linköping, Sweden
- Linköping University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Two samples are used.
- Population sample. Statistics Sweden combine data from the Swedish Occupational Register with data about industry codes (SNI-codes) to make a national randomized sample of staff working in home care services (n=12000) and nursing homes (n=11000) in Sweden.
- Workplace sample. The Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR) have an official categorization of the 290 municipalities in Sweden based on e.g., urban area size, proximity to a larger urban area, and commuting patterns. One municipality in each of the nine categories has been randomly selected for participation. Staff in each selected municipalities will be invited to participate through managers in each organization.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Working in home care services or a long-term care facility in Sweden
- Working in direct contact with older adults (e.g., providing care, nursing, rehabilitation to older adults)
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Random sample
Random sample of staff working in home care services or long-term care facilities according to national registers
|
|
Workplace sample
Staff working in home care services and long-term care facilities in a selected number of municiaplities who accepted participation in the study
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported perpetration of abuse
Time Frame: Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about abuse. The timeframe used in the questionnaire is experiences of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
Proportion of staff reporting perpetration of abuse of older people during the past 12 monts
|
Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about abuse. The timeframe used in the questionnaire is experiences of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
|
Staff-to-resident abuse
Time Frame: Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
Proportion of staff reporting witnessing abuse of older people by another staff member during the past 12 monts
|
Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
|
Relative-to-resident abuse
Time Frame: Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
Proportion of staff reporting witnessing abuse by a relative during the past 12 months
|
Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
|
Resident-to-resident aggression
Time Frame: Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
Proportion of staff reporting witnessing resident-to-resident abusive behaviours in the past 12 months
|
Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about witnessing acts of abuse during the past 12 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Staff exposure to abuse
Time Frame: Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about expsoure to abuse at the workplace during the past 12 months
|
Proportion of staff reporting exposure to abuse at the workplace during the past 12 months
|
Day1. Cross sectional study using only one point of data collection. Participants are enrolled by returing a questionnaire including items about expsoure to abuse at the workplace during the past 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026-01231-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Elder Abuse
-
Linkoeping UniversityKarolinska Institutet; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Region... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedElder AbuseUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Institute on Aging (NIA)Recruiting
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedElder Abuse | Elder MistreatmentUnited States
-
Rutgers UniversityTerminatedAging | Elder Abuse | Self Neglect | Domestic AbuseUnited States
-
RISE CollaborativeVentura County APS; Harris County APS; Cuyahoga County APS; ONEgeneration; Harris... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingElder Abuse | Self-NeglectUnited States
-
RISE CollaborativeUniversity of Toronto; Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC); Social Sciences...CompletedElder Abuse | Self NeglectCanada
-
University of Southern CaliforniaArchstone FoundationTerminatedDomestic Violence | Family Relations | Elder Abuse | CaregiversUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Not yet recruitingDementia | Elder Abuse | Elder NeglectUnited States