Feasibility of VOICES Elder Abuse Intervention in Primary Care Setting (VOICES-PC Feasibility) (VOICES-PC)

July 11, 2023 updated by: Yale University

The Feasibility of the VOICES Digital Health Tool for Elder Mistreatment Screening in the Primary Care Setting (VOICES-PC Feasibility)

To test an interactive intervention to screen for Elder Abuse and Mistreatment (EM) in the Primary Care (PC) setting to promote self-identification and self-disclosure of EM.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to perform a feasibility evaluation (N=80) of the VOICES screening tool among older adults in the primary care setting. If VOICES is feasible for identifying suspicion of EM in primary care setting, then it will be able to connect more victims of EM to necessary services and potentially prevent a multitude of poor EM outcomes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Yale Internal Medicine Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 years or older
  • Alert and oriented to person and place
  • Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT-4) score of 4
  • Able to consent and communicate in English
  • Agrees and able to use the iPad

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects who live in nursing homes or other long-term care sitting and do not reside in community setting
  • patients will be excluded if they cannot safely undergo the studies required for participation
  • subjects with clear signs of EM
  • Patient or clinician refusal to participate
  • severe hearing and vision impairment
  • COVID-19 positive

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Older adults in Primary Care setting
Elder mistreatment in the Primary Care setting.
Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) screening tool.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participation
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes before VOICES intervention use.
Participation will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in VOICES. Successful enrollment of 80 older adults (N=80).
5-10 minutes before VOICES intervention use.
Usage
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.
Usage will be determined by the number of patients enrolled in the study that complete the VOICES tool. Our target is to enroll 80 older adults (N=80).
5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.

Participant satisfaction will be measured using post-use satisfaction survey. Responses will be measured via two 5-point Likert scales where generally higher values represent better outcomes:

Scale 1- Satisfaction: Where 1= "Very Dissatisfied", 2= "Dissatisfied", 3= "Neutral", 4= "Satisfied", and 5= "Very Satisfied".

Scale 2- Agreement: Where 1= "Strongly Disagree", 2= "Disagree", 3= "Neutral", 4= "Agree", and and 5= "Strongly Agree".

5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.
Demand
Time Frame: 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.
Demand will be assess through examining how likely will VOICES be used by patients. To do this, the size of target population of elder mistreatment (EM) victims in the Primary Care setting will be measured by the percent who screen positive for EM and the percent who receive the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) portion of VOICES. The BNI is a method designed to enhance identifying EM among older adults-- the process intends to encourage reflection of the user with their behaviors and whether they are willing to seek change by identifying with and reporting their abuse.
5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.
Practicality
Time Frame: Actual time duration is assessed during VOICES use by the computer program (the actual duration of the patient's time using VOICES). Estimation of completed time is completed 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.
Practicality will be assessed by observing the ease of VOICES use by patients. To do this, a series of steps will be watched to determine the efficiency of implementation measured by the average time (1) to consent & orient participants to the tool and (2) needed to complete VOICES documented by the Research Assistant; and (3) patients perceived time of VOICES as measured on post-survey. Each of these will be reported as part of the overall outcome.
Actual time duration is assessed during VOICES use by the computer program (the actual duration of the patient's time using VOICES). Estimation of completed time is completed 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention use.
Efficacy of the Brief Negotiation Interview
Time Frame: Measure collected 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.
To look at how many patients changed their readiness to disclose after completing the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI)
Measure collected 5-10 minutes directly following VOICES intervention.
Accuracy
Time Frame: Measure collected up to directly following VOICES intervention to 1 week following VOICES intervention.
To understand the accuracy of the VOICES tool, a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying elder mistreatment (EM) cases that were referred to Adult Protective Services (APS). The percent correct classification will be reported.
Measure collected up to directly following VOICES intervention to 1 week following VOICES intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fuad Abujarad, PhD,MSc, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000023799_b
  • 1R01AG060084-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elder Abuse

Clinical Trials on Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)

Subscribe