Virtual cOaching in Making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) (VOICES)

March 30, 2023 updated by: Yale University
To develop an interactive tool to screen for Elder Mistreatment (EM) in the Emergency Department (ED) to promote self-disclosure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To develop and refine the interactive VOICES tool, which will promote self-identification and self-disclosure to increase reporting of EM at point-of-care in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. Prior to conducting a feasibility study, focus groups will be conducted to inform the process and to develop a tool to evaluate the use of VOICES.

Feasibility Study: To conduct a feasibility study (N= 800) examining the use of VOICES in a busy ED.

Exploratory Aim: To perform a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying EM cases that were referred to Adult Protective Services (APS).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1012

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • St. Raphael Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 years or older
  • Non-full trauma track
  • Alert and oriented to person and place
  • AMT-4 score of 4
  • Able to consent and communicate in English
  • Agrees and able to use the iPad
  • Not in police custody

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects who live in nursing homes or other long-term care sitting and do not reside in community setting
  • patients will be excluded if they cannot safely undergo the studies required for participation
  • subjects with clear signs of EM
  • Patient or clinician refusal to participate
  • severe hearing and vision impairment
  • presenting with active psychotic symptoms
  • presenting with acute intoxication
  • COVID-19 positive

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Elder adults in emergency department setting
Elder mistreatment in an Emergency Department setting.
Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) screening tool.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation in Terms of Participation
Time Frame: up to 16 months
Participation will be determined by the ratio of participants who are successfully enrolled to the total number of eligible patients. The numerator, denominator, frequencies and 95% confidence intervals will be reported.
up to 16 months
Implementation in Terms of Usage
Time Frame: up to 16 months
Usage will be determined by the number of consented participants enrolled in the study who used VOICES to completion.
up to 16 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability
Time Frame: up to 16 months

Participant satisfaction will be measured along multiple dimensions using post-use satisfaction survey with two 5-point Likert response set scales, developed by the research team.

Scale 1: Likert scale 1-5, where 1= Very Dissatisfied, and 5= Very Satisfied Scale 2: Likert scale 1-5, where 1= Strongly Disagree, and 5= Strongly Agree

up to 16 months
Demand
Time Frame: up to 16 months
Demand will be assessed through examining how likely will VOICES be used by patients. To do this, the size of target population of EM victims in the ED will be measured by the % of the patients who self-identified with elder mistreatment and the % who receive the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) portion of VOICES.
up to 16 months
Practicality
Time Frame: up to 16 months
Practicality will be assessed by observing the ease of VOICES use by patients. To do this, a series of steps will be watched to determine the efficiency of implementation measured by the average time (1) to consent & orient participants to the tool and (2) needed to complete VOICES documented by the Research Assistant; and (3) patients perceived time of VOICES as measured on post-survey. Each of these will be reported as part of the overall outcome.
up to 16 months
Efficacy of the Educational Material
Time Frame: up to 16 months
To understand the efficacy of VOICES in this pilot, we will look at how many participants changed their self-identification response after completing the educational component.
up to 16 months
Efficacy of the Brief Negotiation Interview
Time Frame: up to 16 months
We will look at how many patients changed their readiness to disclose after completing the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI).
up to 16 months
Efficacy of Self-Identification on Self-Disclosure
Time Frame: up to 16 months

We will explore whether self-identification impacts likelihood of self-disclosure.

Effect-size estimation measured by change in the % of patients who disclose among those who self-identified.

up to 16 months
Accuracy
Time Frame: up to 16 months
To understand the accuracy of the VOICES tool, a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying EM cases that were positive based on social worker assessment, and those referred to Adult Protective Services (APS). The percent correct classification will be reported.
up to 16 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fuad Abujarad, PhD,MSc, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2000023799
  • 5R01AG060084-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elder Abuse

Clinical Trials on Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)

3
Subscribe