- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03834870
Virtual cOaching in Making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) (VOICES)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
To develop and refine the interactive VOICES tool, which will promote self-identification and self-disclosure to increase reporting of EM at point-of-care in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. Prior to conducting a feasibility study, focus groups will be conducted to inform the process and to develop a tool to evaluate the use of VOICES.
Feasibility Study: To conduct a feasibility study (N= 800) examining the use of VOICES in a busy ED.
Exploratory Aim: To perform a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying EM cases that were referred to Adult Protective Services (APS).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
- St. Raphael Emergency Department
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 60 years or older
- Non-full trauma track
- Alert and oriented to person and place
- AMT-4 score of 4
- Able to consent and communicate in English
- Agrees and able to use the iPad
- Not in police custody
Exclusion Criteria:
- subjects who live in nursing homes or other long-term care sitting and do not reside in community setting
- patients will be excluded if they cannot safely undergo the studies required for participation
- subjects with clear signs of EM
- Patient or clinician refusal to participate
- severe hearing and vision impairment
- presenting with active psychotic symptoms
- presenting with acute intoxication
- COVID-19 positive
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Elder adults in emergency department setting
Elder mistreatment in an Emergency Department setting.
|
Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES) screening tool.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implementation in Terms of Participation
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Participation will be determined by the ratio of participants who are successfully enrolled to the total number of eligible patients.
The numerator, denominator, frequencies and 95% confidence intervals will be reported.
|
up to 16 months
|
Implementation in Terms of Usage
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Usage will be determined by the number of consented participants enrolled in the study who used VOICES to completion.
|
up to 16 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptability
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Participant satisfaction will be measured along multiple dimensions using post-use satisfaction survey with two 5-point Likert response set scales, developed by the research team. Scale 1: Likert scale 1-5, where 1= Very Dissatisfied, and 5= Very Satisfied Scale 2: Likert scale 1-5, where 1= Strongly Disagree, and 5= Strongly Agree |
up to 16 months
|
Demand
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Demand will be assessed through examining how likely will VOICES be used by patients.
To do this, the size of target population of EM victims in the ED will be measured by the % of the patients who self-identified with elder mistreatment and the % who receive the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) portion of VOICES.
|
up to 16 months
|
Practicality
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
Practicality will be assessed by observing the ease of VOICES use by patients.
To do this, a series of steps will be watched to determine the efficiency of implementation measured by the average time (1) to consent & orient participants to the tool and (2) needed to complete VOICES documented by the Research Assistant; and (3) patients perceived time of VOICES as measured on post-survey.
Each of these will be reported as part of the overall outcome.
|
up to 16 months
|
Efficacy of the Educational Material
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
To understand the efficacy of VOICES in this pilot, we will look at how many participants changed their self-identification response after completing the educational component.
|
up to 16 months
|
Efficacy of the Brief Negotiation Interview
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
We will look at how many patients changed their readiness to disclose after completing the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI).
|
up to 16 months
|
Efficacy of Self-Identification on Self-Disclosure
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
We will explore whether self-identification impacts likelihood of self-disclosure. Effect-size estimation measured by change in the % of patients who disclose among those who self-identified. |
up to 16 months
|
Accuracy
Time Frame: up to 16 months
|
To understand the accuracy of the VOICES tool, a preliminary evaluation of the accuracy of VOICES as a screening tool in correctly classifying EM cases that were positive based on social worker assessment, and those referred to Adult Protective Services (APS).
The percent correct classification will be reported.
|
up to 16 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Fuad Abujarad, PhD,MSc, Yale University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2000023799
- 5R01AG060084-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Elder Abuse
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedElder Abuse | Elder MistreatmentUnited States
-
Rutgers UniversityTerminatedAging | Elder Abuse | Self Neglect | Domestic AbuseUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Institute on Aging (NIA)Not yet recruiting
-
University of Southern CaliforniaArchstone FoundationTerminatedDomestic Violence | Family Relations | Elder Abuse | CaregiversUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); New York City Department for the...RecruitingDepression | Elder AbuseUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingAged | Geriatrics | Elder Abuse | Geriatric Assessment | Surveys and Questionnaires | Health Services for the Aged | Self NeglectUnited States
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaActive, not recruitingKnowledge and Interpersonal Skills to Develop Exemplary Relationships (KINDER): Pilot Study (KINDER)Dementia | Caregiver Burden | Elder Abuse | Relation, FamilyUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedDepression | Anxiety | Depression in Old Age | Elder AbuseUnited States
-
Guangdong Raynovent Biotech Co., LtdCompleted
Clinical Trials on Virtual cOaching in making Informed Choices on Elder Mistreatment Self-Disclosure (VOICES)
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedElder Abuse | Elder MistreatmentUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed