- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07508787
A Study Comparing Siplizumab With Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin to Help the Body Accept a Kidney Transplant (MODERNIZE1)
Phase 2b, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Dose-Finding, Active-Controlled Study of Siplizumab (TCD601) Compared to Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Renal Transplant Recipients Requiring Induction Therapy and Receiving Standard of Care Immunosuppression With Tacrolimus, Mycophenolic Acid and Corticosteroids
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if siplizumab can prevent rejection of a kidney transplant in adult participants with end stage kidney disease. The main questions it aims to answer are:
How many adverse events do participants receiving two different doses of siplizumab have compared to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG)?
How many participants successfully keep their kidney transplant after receiving siplizumab or rATG? This will be calculated as those participants that did not: die; have their kidney fail to work properly (graft loss); their body rejects their transplant (tissue sample (biopsy)-proven acute rejection: BPAR); or who were lost to follow-up.
How does the body respond to siplizumab after dosing at each of the 2 dose levels?
How does siplizumab work in the body compared to rATG?
Selected participants will be divided into 3 groups. In 2 of the groups, participants will be given siplizumab at one of the two study medicine doses. Participants in the third group will be given rATG. All participants will take the usual anti-rejection medicines given before, during, and after a kidney transplant. All participants will also be given medicines before the study drug to lower the risk of reactions, and medicines used to prevent or treat infections after the transplant.
Participants will be asked to provide their medical history at the first visit at the study site where you will have your kidney transplant. At the first visit and other visits participants will be asked to provide their medication history, have a physical exam, check vital signs, have blood drawn for tests, and have non-invasive tests that record the electrical activity of your heart (ECG) and blood draws.
Participants will be monitored for 12 months after transplant surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Approximately 120 renal transplant candidates requiring induction therapy will be enrolled 1:1:1 to receive 1 of 2 dose levels of siplizumab or to the comparator rATG.
Randomization will be stratified by donor status (living vs donation after brain death vs donation after cardiac death) to ensure similar proportions of donor types in each study arm. All participants will also receive:
- A triple regimen (TAC, MPA, and CS) of background immunosuppressive therapy for the duration of the study.
- Premedication prior to study treatment infusions.
- Infection prophylaxis
This clinical trial will evaluate the safety of an anti-cluster of differentiation 2 (CD2) monoclonal antibody, siplizumab, compared to rATG as induction therapy in renal transplant recipients.
Following hospital discharge, participants will undergo assessments and procedures as indicated in the protocol through Month 12 or EOS, unless more frequent visits are required per local SoC or for laboratory specimen collection.
Safety assessments will include physical examinations, ECGs, vital signs, viral surveillance and monitoring, standard clinical laboratory evaluations completed centrally (hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis), and AE/SAE monitoring.
Final analysis will be performed when all participants have completed 12-month follow-up visits post-transplant or have otherwise ended the trial. This analysis will be performed to evaluate the safety of siplizumab at 2 dose levels compared to rATG.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recipients of a renal allograft from a non-HLA identical living or deceased donor.
- Recipients of a kidney with a cold ischemia time < 30 hours; hypothermic machine perfusion within the same timeframe is acceptable.
- Women of childbearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, must agree to use highly effective methods of contraception.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Transplant recipients seronegative for EBV.
- Transplant recipients receiving a kidney from a non-heart beating donor (ie, DCD) whose organ is retrieved from an uncontrolled DCD or whose donor age > 55 years of age.
- Multi-organ transplant recipients (eg, kidney-pancreas, organ other than kidney), dual-kidney transplant recipients, recipients with more than one prior kidney transplant, or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.
- Presence of current or historical DSA via single-antigen bead assay or local SoC. The MFI cut-off value used to determine the presence of DSA will be defined as per the institutional SoC. Results within 3 months prior to transplant are acceptable.
- Crossmatch positive (isolated positive B cell crossmatches are not an exclusion criterion).
- ABO-incompatible recipient.
- Administration of complement inhibitor therapy within 6 months prior to the transplant, or likely to require treatment with complement inhibitor therapy during the study.
- Participants receiving immunosuppressive therapies prior to transplant for pre-existing conditions must be candidates for the protocol-defined regimen.
- History of malignancy of any organ system, except for localized excised non-melanomatous skin lesions or carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
- Seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B surface antigen. Participants who are seropositive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) are excluded without proof of sustained viral response after anti-HCV treatment.
- Recipient of a kidney from a donor who tests positive for human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B surface antigen/hepatitis B core protein.
- History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or to drugs of similar chemical classes (eg, siplizumab, rATG, TAC, MPA derivatives, CS).
- Evidence of active tuberculosis (TB) infection (participants with a history of latent TB may become eligible after treatment with anti-TB therapy according to national guidelines).
- Participants with severe systemic infection(s), at the time of screening or within 2 weeks prior to randomization
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low dose siplizumab
|
A non-agonistic, humanized, anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody of the IgG1κ class
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: High dose siplizumab
|
A non-agonistic, humanized, anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody of the IgG1κ class
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin
|
An anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin preparation made of purified polyclonal antibodies derived from rabbits
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the safety of 2 dose levels of siplizumab versus rATG.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number and percentage of participants at 12 months post-transplant experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
• Grade of BPAR.
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
• Severity of BPAR.
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the incidence of composite efficacy failure (defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], or loss-to-follow-up) and their individual components.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
• Number of participants requiring for-cause renal allograft biopsy assessments over 12 months post-transplant.
|
12 months
|
|
Assessment of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Siplizumab Cmax (maximum blood concentration) over 12 weeks post-transplant.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Assessment of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Siplizumab AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) over 12 weeks post-transplant.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Assessment of the pharmacodynamics (PD) of 2 dose levels of siplizumab versus rATG.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Depletion and recovery of lymphocyte count by subset (total lymphocytes; CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells; CD19+ B cells; CD56+ NK cells) over 12 months post-transplant.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TCD601B205
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Renal Transplant Failure and Rejection
-
Columbia UniversityVeloxis PharmaceuticalsCompletedRenal Transplant Rejection | Kidney Transplant Failure and RejectionUnited States
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompletedImmunosuppression | Renal Transplant Rejection | Renal Transplant Failure | Renal Transplant InfectionUnited Kingdom
-
Hopital FochRecruitingLung Transplant Rejection | Lung Transplant Failure | Lung Transplant; Complications | Lung Transplant Failure and RejectionFrance
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesStanford UniversityCompletedRenal Transplant | Rejection Acute Renal | Rejection Chronic Renal | Rejection of Renal Transplant | Renin-Angiotensin SystemUnited States
-
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustKidney Research United KingdomRecruitingFrailty | Kidney Transplant Rejection | Renal Transplant | Diagnosis | Kidney Transplant; Complications | Kidney Transplant | Renal Transplant Failure | Transplant DysfunctionUnited Kingdom
-
Loma Linda UniversityRecruitingGraft Failure | Acute Rejection of Renal TransplantUnited States
-
Juan Francisco Delgado JimenezFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos IIIActive, not recruitingAntibody-mediated Rejection | Heart Transplant Rejection | Transplant FailureSpain
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedKidney Transplant Rejection | Antibody-mediated Rejection | Kidney Transplant FailureGermany
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownRenal Transplant Rejection | Graft Failure | Transplant; Failure, Kidney | Chronic Renal Failure (CRF)Brazil
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingTransplant; Complication, Rejection | Renal Transplant Rejection | Immune Repertoire | AlloreactivityAustria
Clinical Trials on Siplizumab
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamITB-Med LLCRecruitingHidradenitis SuppurativaUnited States
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Terminated
-
Elizabeth C. VernaITB-Med LLCRecruitingAutoimmune Liver Disease | Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis | Autoimmune Hepatitis | Cirrhosis, Liver | Liver Transplant Disorder | End Stage Liver DIseaseUnited States
-
ITB-Med LLCRecruiting
-
ITB-Med LLCTerminatedKidney TransplantationSpain, Austria, Sweden
-
Massachusetts General HospitalOssium Health, Inc.; ITB-Med LLCActive, not recruitingKidney Failure | Kidney Transplant; Complications | ChimeraUnited States
-
Tatsuo Kawai, MD, PhDEledon Pharmaceuticals; ITB-Med LLCRecruitingKidney Failure | Transplant Tolerance | Immunosuppresion | Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplantation | Transplant Recipient (Kidney)United States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Columbia UniversityITB-Med LLCTerminated
-
ITB-Med LLCActive, not recruitingLiver TransplantationSweden