Investigation of the Effects of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block on Perioperative Analgesia Management in Patients Scheduled for Mastectomy

March 29, 2026 updated by: Muhammed Alihan Mol, Uludag University

Mastektomi Planlanan Hastalarda Serratus Posterior Superior İnterkostal Plan Bloğu Ile Serratus Anterior Plan Bloğunun Peroperatif Analjezi Yönetimi Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması

This study aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and the serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block, in patients undergoing elective mastectomy surgery. Postoperative pain following mastectomy is a common and significant clinical problem that negatively affects patient comfort, delays mobilization, and may prolong hospital stay. Although systemic analgesics are commonly used, they are associated with adverse effects such as sedation, constipation, and potential dependency.

In this randomized clinical study, female patients aged 18-75 years with ASA physical status I-III scheduled for elective mastectomy will be included after obtaining informed consent. Patients will be allocated into two groups to receive either SAP block or SPSIP block under ultrasound guidance prior to surgery. Standardized general anesthesia and perioperative analgesia protocols will be applied to all patients.

The primary objective is to compare postoperative pain scores between the two groups using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes include time to first analgesic requirement, total analgesic consumption, intraoperative opioid use, and hemodynamic parameters. By comparing these two interfascial plane blocks, this study aims to identify a more effective analgesic technique that improves postoperative pain control, enhances patient comfort, and facilitates early mobilization following mastectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain following mastectomy surgery remains a significant clinical concern, as it negatively impacts patient comfort, delays recovery, and may prolong hospital stay. Effective pain management is essential not only to improve patient satisfaction but also to reduce complications associated with delayed mobilization. Although systemic opioids and other analgesics are frequently used, they are associated with adverse effects such as sedation, nausea, constipation, and risk of dependency. Therefore, regional anesthesia techniques have gained increasing importance as part of multimodal analgesia strategies.

Ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks, such as the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and the serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block, have been shown to provide effective analgesia for thoracic and breast surgeries by targeting similar dermatomal distributions. However, comparative data regarding their relative efficacy in mastectomy patients are limited. This study aims to compare these two techniques in terms of postoperative analgesia and recovery outcomes.

Female patients aged between 18 and 75 years, classified as ASA physical status I, II, or III, and scheduled for elective mastectomy will be included in the study after obtaining written informed consent. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups.

In Group 1, patients will receive an ultrasound-guided SAP block using a linear probe under aseptic conditions. The block will be performed in the lateral decubitus position by advancing the needle between the second and seventh ribs to the plane beneath the serratus anterior muscle, and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.

In Group 2, patients will receive an ultrasound-guided SPSIP block under aseptic conditions in the sitting position. The needle will be inserted medially to the scapula between the second and seventh ribs, targeting the plane between the serratus posterior superior muscle and intercostal muscles, and 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum dose 2 mg/kg/day) will be administered.

All patients will undergo standardized general anesthesia, including induction with midazolam, lidocaine, propofol, fentanyl, and rocuronium, followed by maintenance with desflurane at 1 MAC. Standard intraoperative monitoring (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO₂, and ECG) will be applied. Intraoperative administration of paracetamol, tenoxicam, and granisetron will be performed routinely.

Hemodynamic parameters will be recorded at 30-minute intervals during surgery. Total intraoperative opioid consumption, duration of surgery, and anesthesia time will also be documented. At the end of surgery, neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with sugammadex.

Postoperative pain will be assessed by a blinded investigator using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 0, 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours. Time to first analgesic requirement, additional analgesic use, and total consumption will be recorded.

Patients with NRS ≥4 will receive intravenous paracetamol as first-line rescue analgesia. If pain persists, intravenous opioid (1 mg/kg) will be administered as second-line rescue analgesia.

Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, pain during first mobilization, and patient and surgeon satisfaction assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS version 25. Normality of data will be assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Parametric or non-parametric tests will be used accordingly. Independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test will be used for comparisons between groups, while paired t-test or Wilcoxon test will be used for within-group comparisons. ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests will be used for comparisons involving more than two groups. A p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

This study is expected to determine the comparative effectiveness of SAP and SPSIP blocks in reducing postoperative pain, minimizing analgesic consumption, and improving recovery outcomes in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nilüfer
      • Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey (Türkiye), 16235
        • Recruiting
        • Bursa Uludag University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Selcan Akesen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients scheduled for elective mastectomy surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Patients who provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV or V
  • Patients receiving anticoagulant therapy or with suspected coagulopathy
  • Patients with known allergy to local anesthetic agents
  • Infection at the site of block application
  • Pregnant patients or those with suspected pregnancy
  • Patients with severe neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Patients with severe cardiovascular disease
  • Patients with chronic opioid use
  • Patients with hepatic failure or renal failure (glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m²)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SAPB Group
Patients in this group will receive Serratus Anterior Plane Block for postoperative analgesia.
Under ultrasound guidance with a linear probe, the needle is inserted along the posterior axillary line between the second and seventh ribs and advanced into the plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the rib surface. A total of 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum dose 2 mg/kg/day) is injected.
Experimental: SPSIPB Group
Patients in this group will receive Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for postoperative analgesia.
Under ultrasound guidance with a linear probe, the superomedial border of the scapula on the operative side is identified. The needle is inserted medial to the scapula between the second and seventh ribs and advanced into the interfascial plane between the serratus posterior superior muscle and the intercostal muscles. Subsequently, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (maximum dose 2 mg/kg/day) is administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
Postoperative pain intensity and time to first analgesic requirement will be evaluated. Pain will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at 0 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively, both at rest and during movement, by a blinded investigator
Within 48 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Analgesic Consumption
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
Total consumption of additional analgesics (paracetamol and opioid) will be recorded.
Within 48 hours postoperatively
Additional Analgesic Requirement
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
The number of patients requiring additional analgesia and the frequency of administration will be recorded.
Within 48 hours postoperatively
Intraoperative Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: During surgery
The total amount of opioids administered intraoperatively will be recorded.
During surgery
Intraoperative mean arterial pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: Every 30 minutes intraoperatively
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) will be recorded at 30 minute intervals during surgery and summarized as mean values.
Every 30 minutes intraoperatively
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
Postoperative complications such as nausea, vomiting or other adverse events will be recorded.
Within 48 hours postoperatively
Pain During First Mobilization
Time Frame: Within 48 hours postoperatively
Pain during first mobilization will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Within 48 hours postoperatively
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: At the 24th hour post-operation
evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1=very dissatisfied, 5=very satisfied)
At the 24th hour post-operation
Surgeon satisfaction score
Time Frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively
The primary surgeon's satisfaction will the analgesia quality and ease of the procedure, evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1= very dissatisfied , 5= very satisfied)
Within 24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to protect patient privacy and confidentiality. The data collected for this study will only be used for the purposes of this specific research and will not be made available to other researchers to comply with institutional ethical guidelines.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on SAP Block

Subscribe