CsA+EPAG/HPAG+Romiplostim N01 in the Treatment of Newly-diagnosed SAA/TD-NSAA

April 4, 2026 updated by: Bing Han, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Cyclosporine, Eltrombopag or Hetrombopag, and Romiplostim N01 in the Treatment of Newly-diagnosed Transfusion-dependent Non-severe Aplastic Anemia/ Severe Aplastic Anemia

This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine (CsA) combined with eltrombopag (EPAG)/hetrombopag (HPAG) and romiplostim N01 in the treatment of newly-diagnosed transfusion-dependent aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) and severe aplastic anemia (SAA)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For SAA/TD-NSAA patients without HLA-matched donors and those over 40 years old, the first choice is immunosuppressive therapy (IST) + cyclosporine A (CsA) combined with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs).

TPO-RAs could bind to the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor, causing conformational changes in the TPO receptor and activating the JAK2/STAT5 pathway, thereby increasing the proliferation of megakaryocyte progenitor cells and platelet production. Previous studies have shown that compared with IST alone, the combination of IST and eltrombopag (EPAG)/hetrombopag (HPAG) as the first-line treatment for SAA can increase the overall response rate (ORR) to 60%-70%.

However, ATG treatment requires hospitalization and has significant toxic effects, leading to a high risk of complications in the elderly or patients with poor health. Therefore, in recent years, treatment regimens without ATG have also been gradually explored. The results of the SOAR trial showed that in newly diagnosed SAA patients, the overall hematological response rate after 6 months of CsA + EPAG was 46%.

In a phase II/III study for refractory AA, romiplostim monotherapy achieved an ORR of 84% at week 27. Although both romiplostim and eltrombopag/hyrtiopeg activate the TPO receptor (c-Mpl), there are differences and complementarities in their molecular mechanisms. Romiplostim is a peptide mimetic that binds to the extracellular domain of the receptor to mimic endogenous TPO; while eltrombopag and hetrombopag are small molecules that target the transmembrane domain, among which hetrombopag replaces the biphenyl structure to enhance lipophilicity, improve efficacy, and reduce liver toxicity. The binding sites of the two drugs are spatially separated and may produce a synergistic effect through different intensities and dynamics of downstream STAT, PI3K/AKT, and other signaling pathways.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Diagnosed with aplastic anemia (AA) through routine blood tests, bone marrow puncture, bone marrow biopsy, and exclusion tests, and determined as transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) or severe aplastic anemia (SAA) according to the Camitta criteria; Platelet < 30×10^9/L;
  3. Had no HLA-matched donors or was not suitable for first-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT);
  4. Not suitable for ATG, due to reasons such as age, complications, and the patient's own wishes;
  5. With baseline liver and kidney functions <2 ULN;
  6. ECOG score ≤ 2;
  7. Signed the informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had other primary or secondary bone marrow failure (BMF) diseases, such as Fanconi anemia, congenital keratinization disorder, etc.;
  2. With evidence of clonal hematological bone marrow diseases (MDS, AML) in cytogenetics;
  3. PNH clone ≥ 50%;
  4. Received HSCT before enrollment;
  5. Previously used immunosuppressive treatments such as ATG, CsA, TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs);
  6. Allergic or intolerant to romiplostim N01, eltrombopag, hetrombopag, or CsA;
  7. Pregnant or lactating patients;
  8. Severe bleeding or infection that cannot be controlled by standard treatment;
  9. History of arterial or venous thrombosis;
  10. Complicated with malignant tumors;
  11. Participated in other clinical trials within 3 months;
  12. Patients considered not suitable to participate in this study by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CsA+EPAG/HPAG+Romiplostim N01
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d, trough concentration 100-200ng/ml Eltrombopag 50mg/d, increased by 25mg every two weeks Hetrombopag 7.5mg/d, increased by 2.5mg every two weeks Romiplostim N01 20µg/kg subcutaneously, once a week
CsA 3-5mg/kg/d
Eltrombopag: initial dose 50mg/d, maximum dose 150mg/d hetrombopag 7.5mg/d, maximum dose 15mg/d
Romiplostim N01: 20 µg/kg, subcutaneously, once a week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 6-month
ORR=CRR+PRR
6-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ORR
Time Frame: 3-month, 12-month
ORR=PRR+CRR
3-month, 12-month
red blood cell (RBC)/platelet (PLT) transfusion independent rate
Time Frame: 3-month, 6-month, 12-month
Proportion of patients who achieve red blood cell (RBC)/platelet (PLT) transfusion independence for 8 weeks or longer
3-month, 6-month, 12-month
AE rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
proportion of patients with adverse events, according to CTCAE
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA)

Clinical Trials on Cyclosporine (CsA)

Subscribe