Comparison of the Effectiveness of Nerve Hydrodissection With Saline Injection of 5% Dextrose in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

April 6, 2026 updated by: Antalya Training and Research Hospital

Evaluation of Pain, Hand Function, Electrophysiological and Ultrasonographic Effects When Comparing 5% Dextrose Saline Injection Via Nerve Hydrodissection Under Ultrasound Guidance in Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Comparison of the effectiveness of nerve hydrodissection with saline injection of 5% dextrose in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Evaluation of pain, hand function, electrophysiological and ultrasonographic effects when comparing 5% dextrose saline injection via nerve hydrodissection under ultrasound guidance in mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-80 years
  • Clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Symptom duration of at least 3 months
  • Both male and female participants
  • Patients who have not responded adequately to conservative treatment
  • Patients who do not wish to undergo surgical treatment
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe or very severe carpal tunnel syndrome based on EMG findings
  • Previous injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Prior wrist or carpal tunnel surgery
  • Polyneuropathy or other peripheral neuropathies
  • Cervical radiculopathy or proximal median nerve entrapment
  • Brachial plexopathy or thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Pregnancy
  • Malignancy
  • Local or systemic infection
  • Cognitive impairment affecting cooperation
  • Systemic diseases affecting the median nerve (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, thyroid disorders)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 5% dextrose group
Ultrasound-guided median nerve hydrodissection with 5% dextrose
Injection therapy
Other Names:
  • Saline Injection (Placebo / Sham), Splint group
Sham Comparator: Saline group
Sham ultrasound-guided perineural injection with normal saline
Injection therapy
Other Names:
  • Saline Injection (Placebo / Sham), Splint group
Sham Comparator: Splint group
Patients use only a wrist splint without injection therapy
Injection therapy
Other Names:
  • Saline Injection (Placebo / Sham), Splint group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 month
The primary outcome is the change in pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10). The difference between baseline and follow-up scores will be analyzed.
Baseline to 8 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Qucik DASH score
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 month
Assessed using symptom severity and functional status scales
Baseline to 8 month
Change in median nerve cross-sectional area
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 month
Measured at the carpal tunnel inlet using ultrasonography
Baseline to 8 month
hange in nerve conduction study parameters
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 month
Distal motor latency and sensory conduction velocity of the median nerve
Baseline to 8 month
Change in hand grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 month
Strength of the arm
Baseline to 8 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conditions

Clinical Trials on Nerve Hydrodissection with 5% Dextrose

Subscribe