Lung Ultrasound as a Predictor for Successful Extubation in Preterm Infants (LUSE)

unit (NICU); however prolonged MV is known to be associated with serious complications including ventilator associated pneumonia, blood stream infections, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and periventricular leukomalacia. At the same time, extubation failure increases morbidities and mortality. Hatch et al (2016) in their prospective study on 162 infants described adverse events in 40% of intubations and severe complications including need for CPR in 9%. Reintubations are frequently associated with hypoxemia, bradycardia, fluctuations in blood pressures and cerebral perfusion. Each intubation attempt increases the risk of traumatic injury to the upper airway, lung atelectasis and infections. Thus, there is a clear need to establish objective criteria that would help avoid extubation failure and the need for reintubation.

In recent years, a new imaging application has been introduced in neonatal practice-lung ultrasound (LUS), an accurate and reliable technique for the lung evaluation. LUS is safe, non-ionizing, easy to operate, and low-cost tool. The evaluation of lungs is performed in real-time, on the bedside and without anesthetic drugs. Lung aeration could be assessed in dynamics without extra radiation to the infant. Ultrasound findings combined with clinical information could be used for the prognosis of successful extubation in premature infants.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: no Conditions
• Intervention / Treatment: Diagnostic test: Lung Ultrasound (LUS)

Detailed Description

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a widely used therapeutic resource in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU); however prolonged MV is known to be associated with serious complications including ventilator associated pneumonia, blood stream infections, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and periventricular leukomalacia. At the same time, extubation failure increases morbidities and mortality. Hatch et al (2016) in their prospective study on 162 infants described adverse events in 40% of intubations and severe complications including need for CPR in 9%. Reintubations are frequently associated with hypoxemia, bradycardia, fluctuations in blood pressures and cerebral perfusion. Each intubation attempt increases the risk of traumatic injury to the upper airway, lung atelectasis and infections. Thus, there is a clear need to establish objective criteria that would help avoid extubation failure and the need for reintubation.

Currently used criteria for extubation are subjective and based on clinical evaluation, chest radiograph findings, amount of ventilatory support and arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters. An accurate bedside test for extubation readiness in preterm infants born is even more important as this population is more susceptible to the complications of re-intubation. There are several studies that showed that reintubation after elective extubation is independently associated with increased likelihood of death and BPD in extremely preterm infants. The greatest risks are attributable to reintubation within the first 48 hours post-extubation.

Several studies have shown that a low lung volume and small chest radiograph lung area after extubation could predict extubation failure. Infants who have a low lung volume after extubation may have an unfavourable balance between respiratory muscle strength and respiratory load. Ideally, these infants should be identified before removal of the endotracheal tube.

In recent years, a new imaging application has been introduced in neonatal practice-lung ultrasound (LUS), an accurate and reliable technique for the lung evaluation. LUS is safe, non-ionizing, easy to operate, and low-cost tool. The evaluation of lungs is performed in real-time, on the bedside and without anesthetic drugs. Lung aeration could be assessed in dynamics without extra radiation to the infant. Ultrasound findings combined with clinical information could be used for the prognosis of successful extubation in premature infants.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 20

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Saskatchewan
    • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
      • Royal University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Invasively ventilated infants born before 32 weeks of gestational age

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Invasively ventilated infants born at less than 32 weeks of gestational age were included at the time of their first extubation

Exclusion Criteria:

• infants born after 32 weeks of gestational age

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Observational Models: Cohort
• Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
lung aeration before and after extubation by comparing LUS indexes	30 minutes
re-intubation within 12, 36 or 72 hours	72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon

Publications and helpful links

Helpful Links

• Related Info

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 14, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: November 16, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 16, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): November 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 29, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 16, 2022
• Last Verified: November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Lung ultrasound; Prematurity; RDS; Extubation; Mechanical ventilation
• Other Study ID Numbers: Bio ID 1451

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Undecided