Effective Hemostasis: An Analysis of Hemostatic Sponges Used in Extraction Procedures

April 7, 2026 updated by: Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu
Tooth extraction is a common dental procedure, where hemostasis is crucial for patient recovery. This study evaluates the effectiveness of hemostatic sponges in controlling bleeding and promoting postoperative healing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A non-randomized experimental study was conducted at the Santo Tomás de Aquino School of Dentistry Clinic with 30 patients undergoing tooth extractions. They were divided into two groups: one with hemostatic sponges (experimental) and the other without (control). Variables such as bleeding time, wound depth, pain, and postoperative complications at 1, 8, and 15 days were analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Caaguazú Department
      • Coronel Oviedo, Caaguazú Department, Paraguay, 33000
        • Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age who underwent tooth extractions at the Santo Tomás de Aquino School of Dentistry clinic.
  • Teeth to be extracted, both upper and lower.
  • Diagnosis of pulp necrosis or irreversible pulpitis, with no possibility of endodontic treatment, impacted teeth, or periodontal disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Smokers and alcoholics.
  • Patients who were uncooperative or did not attend follow-up appointments.
  • Patients who did not respond to follow-up calls.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hemostatic sponge
The colocation of a hemostatic sponge post extraction in the wound
Effectiveness of hemostatic sponges in patients undergoing tooth extractions, analyzing immediate hemostasis and scar development at different postoperative times.
No Intervention: No intervention
No colocation of hemostatic sponge in the wound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-tooth extraction hemostasis.
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Time measured in minutes from the end of the extraction procedure until complete bleeding cessation, assessed by direct clinical observation.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Wound dimensional changes
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Measurement of socket length, width, and depth using calibrated periodontal probe. Data will be reported as mean change in millimeters from baseline measurement.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Pain intensity
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Pain intensity measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Edema assessment
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Edema assessed by clinical examination using a 4-point scale: 0 = no edema, 1 = mild edema, 2 = moderate edema, 3 = severe edema. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Tissue color changes evaluation
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Evaluation of tissue color changes using a standardized 5-point wound healing color scale: 1 = normal pink, 2 = pale pink, 3 = red, 4 = dark red/purple, 5 = black/necrotic. Higher scores indicate worse healing.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Post-extraction complications
Time Frame: From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15
Incidence of post-extraction complications including but not limited to: dry socket, infection, delayed healing, excessive bleeding, and nerve damage. Complications will be assessed by clinical examination and participant reporting.
From the beggining of the treatment inmediatly, then at day 1, day 8, and at day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sofia Monzon, DDs, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazu, Grupo Salud Oral y Biomateriales

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

On request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

On request

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Other researchers

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Hemostatic sponge post tooth extraction

Subscribe