Post-Market Registry of Transbronchial Cryo-assisted RFA During Routine Standard Bronchoscopic Tumor Stagng and Resection (Cronos)

April 7, 2026 updated by: Christopher Lambers, Elisabethinen Hospital
In order to secure the diagnosis of lung cancer, the investigator will perform a bronchoscopy in order to take tissue samples. These samples will be analyzed in the pathology. This is the routine standard. The aim of the study is to treat the lesion with a device that works both with cold and radiofrequency. The device is already in use for the treatment of lesions. The device allows direct treatment of the lesion during the routine bronchoscopy. As planned, the lesion will then be surgically removed. After the surgery the lesion will be analyzed in the pathology to show the effect of the use of the device. This additional treatment is safe and will support the treatment of the lesion. There are no additional steps or assessments for the participants to undergo.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary nodule ≤ 2.5 cm
  • Candidate for diagnostic bronchoscopy & LN staging
  • Eligible for surgical resection
  • Histologically proven lung cancer
  • ≥20 mm margin to pleura/vessels/bronchi
  • Signed informed consent, age ≥18 y.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy/nursing
  • central tumours abutting vital structures
  • thoracic electronic implants
  • uncorrectable coagulopathy or platelets ≤50 × 10⁹/L
  • severe uncontrolled comorbidities or infection; prior SBRT to zone
  • recent investigational therapy (<30 d)
  • atelectasis/obstructive pneumonitis/effusion/fibrosis
  • investigator-determined risk.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cryo-assisted RFA during Routine Standard Bronchoscopic Tumor Staging and Resection
Transbronchiual Cryo-assisted RFA During Routine Standard Bronchoscopic Tumor Staging and Resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Successful device use, defined as the completion of ablation with the HybridTherm® system with investigator confirmation that the ablation zone achieved sufficient coverage based on intra-procedural imaging.
Time Frame: during procedure
during procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety outcomes, with a specific focus on bleeding events, graded according to the Nashville Bleeding Scale, and the occurrence of other adverse events as documented in the medical record.
Time Frame: up to 6 - 7 weeks post procedure

Nashville Bleeding Scale Grade Findings at Bronchoscopy Rationale

  1. Suctioning of blood required for less than 1 minute Minimal bleeding of no clinical consequence to the patient or the provider
  2. Suctioning more than 1 minute, or repeat wedging of the bronchoscope for persistent bleeding, or instillation of cold saline, diluted vasoactive agents, or thrombin Requires tools to control or prevent further bleeding
  3. Selective intubation with endotracheal tube (ETT) or balloon/bronchial blocker for < 20 minutes, or premature interruption of the procedure Short-term but clinically meaningful change requiring more invasive intervention and procedure interruption
  4. Persistent selective intubation > 20 minutes, or ICU admission, or PRBC transfusion, or need for bronchial artery embolization or resuscitation Indicates serious deterioration, requiring escalation of care and advanced ventilatory and hemodynamic support
up to 6 - 7 weeks post procedure
Macroscopic and microscopic evidence of ablation in the resected specimen, assessed using standard histopathological methods (H&E staining).
Time Frame: within 24 hours after procedure
within 24 hours after procedure
Visual estimation of histopathologic ablation completeness, defined as the estimated percentage of tumor necrosis within the ablation zone, as determined by routine pathology reporting.
Time Frame: within 24 hours after procedure
within 24 hours after procedure
Evaluation of macroscopic and microscopic necrosis within the ablation zone (histopathologic complete response hpCR), defined as the absence of viable tumor cells within the ablated area, if reported as part of routine histological assessment.
Time Frame: within24 hours after procedure
within24 hours after procedure
Descriptive intra-procedural metrics, recorded during the bronchoscopy procedure: Total ablation time; Number of cryoRFA activations; Electrical parameters of energy delivered during the procedure; Number of probe repositioning within the lesion
Time Frame: day 0
total ablation time will be recorded in minutes; number of cryoRFA activations will be recorded in energy applications;
day 0
Estimated ablation zone size (mm), derived from intraoperative CBCT, routinely obtained during the procedure.
Time Frame: day 0
day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Lambers, Elisabethinen Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 639001021
  • 1298/2025 (Other Identifier: Ethics Committee JKU Linz)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

to be determined by Principal Investigator

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NSCLC

Clinical Trials on Cryotherapy

Subscribe