Peyton Model In Midwifery Prenatal Education

April 8, 2026 updated by: Gizem Aydemir, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

The Effect Of Prenatal Care Training Using The Peyton Model On Midwifery Students' Knowledge, Skills, Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, And Satisfaction Levels

In this study, conducted with 64 students from the Gülhane Midwifery Department, the impact of the Peyton model on prenatal examination training was investigated. The students, randomly assigned to two groups, received theoretical and skills training; their knowledge, skills (blind assessor), self-efficacy, anxiety, and satisfaction levels were measured in laboratory and clinical settings 1 and 8 weeks after the training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This thesis study included 64 second-year students enrolled in the Midwifery Department at the Gülhane Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, who had not previously received any training in prenatal care. The participating students were asked to complete the "Student Demographic Information Form," the "Prenatal Examination Knowledge Test," and the "Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale." The students were randomly assigned to two groups: the Peyton Group and the Standard Group. Both groups first received theoretical instruction in a classroom setting, followed by skill training tailored to their respective groups in a laboratory setting one week later. One week after the completion of both theoretical and practical training, the students were invited to the laboratory for the initial assessment. At this stage, participants were asked to complete the "Prenatal Examination Knowledge Test," the "Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale," and the "State Anxiety Inventory" prior to the practical assessment. Practical skills were assessed by a blind evaluator through observation using the "Prenatal Examination Skills Checklist" on a mannequin. Eight weeks after the initial assessment, students were invited to the Prenatal Care Clinic at Gülhane Training and Research Hospital for the clinical practice assessment. Prior to the clinical evaluation, the students were asked to complete the "State Anxiety Inventory." The clinical prenatal examination was evaluated in the same manner by a blind evaluator using the "Prenatal Examination Skills Checklist." At the conclusion of the study, the students were asked to complete the "Satisfaction Survey on Teaching Methods" to determine their opinions regarding the teaching methods employed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • keçiören
      • Ankara, keçiören, Turkey (Türkiye), 06010
        • University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students who have successfully completed the required first-year courses in the curriculum,
  • Students who have not previously performed or observed a prenatal examination,
  • Students who volunteer to participate in the study will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students who had a medical certificate or were on leave during the period the study was conducted,
  • Students who previously took the "Normal Pregnancy Process" and "High-Risk Pregnancies" courses and failed them,
  • Graduates of a health vocational high school,
  • Students with a diagnosed psychological disorder, those experiencing anxiety, or those taking medication for psychiatric treatment will not be included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Peyton Group
Midwifery students receiving prenatal care training based on the Peyton Model
A four-step instructional method (Demonstration, Deconstruction, Comprehension, and Performance)
Active Comparator: Standart Group
Midwifery students receiving standard prenatal care training
Traditional lecture and demonstration-based training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prenatal Examination Skill Scores
Time Frame: 1 week and 8 weeks post-training
The Prenatal Care Skills Checklist was developed by the researchers and consists of 84 items within 4 subscales (Communication, History Taking, Physical Examination, and Evaluation/Planning/Documentation). The checklist uses a 2-point Likert scale and is evaluated on a 100-point system, where higher scores indicate an increased level of skill. Its content validity was validated by CVI.
1 week and 8 weeks post-training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Before training, 1 week and 8 week post-training
The Self-Efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale (SECPS) was developed by Cheraghi et al. (2009) and adapted into Turkish by Pozam and Zaybak (2013). It consists of 37 items and 4 subscales (Data Collection, Nursing Diagnosis/Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation). The scale uses an 11-point Likert-type format ranging from 0% to 100%. Evaluation is based on mean item scores (0-100), where higher scores indicate an increased level of clinical self-efficacy. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .98
Before training, 1 week and 8 week post-training
State Anxiety Levels
Time Frame: 1 week and 8 weeks post-training
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) was developed by Spielberger (1970) and adapted into Turkish by Öner and Le Compte (1983). For this study, the State Anxiety subscale (STAI-S) is used, consisting of 20 items that evaluate the individual's anxiety level at a specific moment. It is scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate an increased level of anxiety. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this subscale ranges from 0.94 to 0.96.
1 week and 8 weeks post-training
Prenatal Care Knowledge Scores
Time Frame: Before training, 1 week and 8 week post-training
The Knowledge Test, developed by the researchers, consists of 25 items. Total scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate greater knowledge levels. The content validity was confirmed by experts using the Content Validity Index (CVI).
Before training, 1 week and 8 week post-training
Satisfaction with Teaching Methods
Time Frame: 8 weeks post-training (at the end of the study)
The Educational Methods Satisfaction Questionnaire, developed by Gürpınar (2005), aims to evaluate participants' satisfaction with the educational method. It consists of 16 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1: Strongly disagree - 5: Strongly agree). The total score ranges from 16 to 80, where higher scores indicate an increased level of satisfaction. The internal consistency of the scale was validated with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84.
8 weeks post-training (at the end of the study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nazan Karahan, Professor, Ph.D., Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SBU-EBE-GA-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Peyton Model Training

Subscribe