Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies

April 9, 2026 updated by: Hsiang Chu Pai, Chung Shan Medical University

Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition

Teaching intervention

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • No.110, Sec.1, Jianguo N.Rd.,Taichung City 40201,Taiwan, R.O.C.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • student over 20 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo
Other: Teaching
This study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
teamwork
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
self-efficacy
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.
Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Chung Shan Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CS1-25084

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing

Clinical Trials on Teaching

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Slovenia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe