Intervention for Hearing Health Among Native Americans (IHHANA)

August 19, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

The purpose of the study is to understand the cultural impact on hearing loss among Native American populations who traditionally rely on oral communication. This Native American community based participatory research hearing protection study proposes to implement a culturally relevant Talking Circles intervention to address hearing health inequities among Native Americans. The goal is to establish a sustainable culturally based Talking Circle (TC) hearing loss prevention program to disseminate messages, thus promote hearing health and improve access to preventive tools within the larger tribal community with high occupational and recreational noise exposure.

TC Participants will:

  • Complete a set of questionnaires (3 total) throughout the study.
  • Complete an audiometer hearing test with headphones, and watch one video computer related to hearing and how to protect hearing at the tribal wellness center.
  • In 6-months into the trial, participants will be asked to complete the same set of questionnaires from the beginning of the study.
  • In 12-months after the baseline surveys and hearing test, participants will be asked to complete the same set of questionnaires that were done at the beginning of the study and complete another hearing test by the computer.

The intervention will include facilitator training for local implementation and a delayed-intervention control to assess knowledge gains and protective behavior changes. Through use of the TC, the participants in the training program can use the support and insight from each other to be trained to establish self-sustaining hearing loss prevention program in the tribal community.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78205
        • American Indians In Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indigenous or Native American community member
  • Age 18 years and older
  • May work in a noisy environment
  • Willing to give informed consent to participate in the study
  • People without hearing loss and with hearing loss as well

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than the age of 18
  • Non Native American community member
  • Unwillingness to provide informed consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Control group
Participants randomized to the control group will receive the delayed TCI after completing the 12-month follow up. Partcipants will receive the second hearing tests 12-months into the study and receive feedback on their hearing test results in comparison with the previous year's result. The control group will be asked to randomly participate in a focus group at the completion of the study.
The control group participants will receive the video/audio computer program on hearing, hearing loss, and diabetes prevention strategies. Participants will receive the delayed TCI after completing the 12-month follow up.
Experimental: Talking Circle Intervention
At baseline, all the participants will complete assessment surveys and hearing tests in their designated community centers. All participants randomized to the experimental group will receive the TCI immediately after baseline assessment as well as the hearing test and computer-based intervention. Each TCI group includes 10 participants who will receive TCI together at a time and day that works the best.
The TC intervention involves applying a tribal specific theory-based approach. The TCI is based within the Native Reliance theoretical model, which is a cultural identity construct that reflects the holistic worldview, values, beliefs, and behaviors within Native American culture. The community partnership community will assess and validate appropriate tribal language, community needs, and culturally content to be included in the TCI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy in Use of Hearing Protection
Time Frame: Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Participants' confidence in their ability to use hearing protection devices correctly will be assessed using a 2-item scale, rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Outcome (Knowledge of noise-induced hearing loss) will be assessed by 3 factors, including self-efficacy as reflecting procedure knowledge (how to do), that serve as mediators of the use of hearing protection. An example of an item from this scale is, "I am sure I can use my hearing protection, so it works effectively."
Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Benefits of Use of Hearing Protection
Time Frame: Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Participants' beliefs regarding the positive results of using hearing protection devices will be assessed by using a 3-item scale, which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Outcome (Knowledge of noise-induced hearing loss) will be assessed by 3 factors that serve as mediators of the use of hearing protection. One of these factors includes the benefits of use as one of two components reflecting declarative knowledge (factual). A sample item for this scale is "Wearing hearing protection protects me against hearing loss from noise exposure."
Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Barriers to Use of Hearing Protection
Time Frame: Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Participants' beliefs about the potential negative aspects of hearing protection device use (i.e., inconvenience, discomfort, difficulty using hearing protection devices, and interference with communication) will be assessed using a 6-item scale, which is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Outcome (Knowledge of noise-induced hearing loss) will be assessed by 3 factors that serve as mediators of the use of hearing protection. One of these factors includes the barriers to use as one of two components reflecting declarative knowledge (factual). A sample item for his scale is, 'Hearing protection keeps me from hearing what I want to hear."
Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
Use of Hearing Protections Devices
Time Frame: Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.
This 2-item scale will measure participants' frequency of hearing protection device use when exposed to high noise level at two time points (the past three months and one month), with data collected at baseline and at 6 and 12-month posttests. A sample item is " What percent of the time (0-100%) did you actually use ear plugs or muffs in the past three months when you were exposed to loud noise?" As the two scores for the two time points are expected to show a strong correlation, the mean of two scores will be used as the outcome variable.
Data collected at 3 time points: Baseline enrollment, 6 months, and 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oi Saeng Hong, PhD, RN, FAAN, FAAOHN, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe