Families Talking Together (FTT) in Texas (FTT)

June 20, 2019 updated by: Power to Decide

The National Campaign - FTT: A Family-based Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program in Texas

Power to Decide, The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, partnered with the Center for Latino Adolescent and Family Health at New York University's Silver School of Social Work, Healthy Futures of Texas, and the Rio Grande Valley Council to implement Families Talking Together (FTT), an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program in Texas. This was a randomized clinical trial of a parent-based sexual and reproductive health intervention (SRH) to foster parent-adolescent communication about sex among Latino adolescents. The FTT intervention focuses on the parenting practices that are important to supporting healthy adolescent sexual behavior. As part of the intervention, families also received a module on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to influence greater linkages to health care.The study was conducted with 634 parent-adolescent dyads in Willacy, Starr, Hidalgo, and Cameron counties in South Texas. Parent-adolescent dyads completed a baseline survey and were allocated to either an experimental or control group. Participating dyads completed follow-up surveys 3 and 9 months' post-baseline assessment. The proposed outcomes of the study were increased adolescent report of parent-adolescent communication about sex, decrease in sexual risk behaviors (e.g., sexual debut) as well as increased health care insurance enrollment among Latino families.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The study was a two-arm parallel RCT designed to test the efficacy of a teen pregnancy prevention program conducted in the Rio Grande Valley from 2013-2018. Parent-adolescent dyads were randomly assigned to either a passive control group that received no intervention or an experimental group which received the promotor delivered family-based SRH prevention program Families Talking Together (FTT) with an added Affordable Care Act (ACA) module. Parent-adolescent dyads completed baseline, immediate post-baseline (3 months) and delayed (9-month) follow-up assessments.

A combination of venue-based and area sampling methods was used in 4 Rio Grande Valley counties to recruit Latino adolescents and their parents residing in colonias for study participation. The 4 counties (Willacy, Starr, Hidalgo, Cameron) were chosen due to well documented SRH disparities among youth.Trained recruitment promotores attended local community health fairs, shopping malls, supermarkets, etc. where large numbers of resident families could be engaged. During these events, recruitment promotores made initial contact with potentially eligible youth and their families in order to screen for study inclusion criteria. In addition, recruiters went door-to-door in targeted communities conducting active outreach and engagement of families directly within their homes. Eligible families were informed that they were being asked to participate in a research project seeking to improve access to SRH programming for adolescents and that participation would require, at minimum, participating in a survey now as well as after 3 and 9 months. We obtained informed assent and parental consent for all adolescents participating in the study. Parents provided their consent to participate.Refusal bias data was collected as part of the screening process. Refusal data suggested no significant differences between those families declining to participate and those agreeing to be part of the study.

Adolescents and their parents completed baseline, immediate post-baseline (3 months), and delayed follow-up (9 months) assessments using self-administered surveys in either English or Spanish, based on preference. Prior to initiation of the RCT, surveys were pilot tested to ensure conceptual clarity and linguistic appropriateness. To ensure confidentiality, parents and adolescents completed questionnaires separately. A social desirability scale was included in the measurement protocol to assess the extent to which participant responses reflect social desirability bias.

A computer random number generation program was used to create a randomly permutated scheme that assigned specific subject identification numbers to either the experimental or passive control group in a one-to-one ratio. An allocation sequence was generated by the principal investigator. Each experimental/control group allocation sequence was placed in a sealed envelope which remained concealed until after participants had enrolled into the study. After the baseline was completed, the sealed envelope was opened with the family's allocation tied to their specific ID. Data collectors administering the immediate and delayed follow-up surveys were blinded to the condition of participants.

Parents randomized to the experimental group received the Families Talking Together (FTT) intervention, an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative SRH outcomes in young adolescents (aged 10 to 14). The FTT intervention has been delivered with efficacy in multiple settings, including schools and clinics. FTT is also identified by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of Adolescent Health (OAH) as a high quality, effective prevention program. The FTT intervention consisted of two components. Intervention component 1 was comprised of two FTT intervention sessions between a parent and the bilingual and bicultural promotor trained to deliver FTT in either English or Spanish. Intervention sessions were delivered to parents in their home or a mutually agreed upon private location in the community. Intervention component 2 was comprised of written supplemental materials that promotores used to guide each intervention session. Written materials included a family FTT workbook and a short story entitled 'Victor and Maria.'

During each intervention session, promotores reviewed the intervention materials and instructed parents how to structure conversations about delaying sexual debut and the use of contraception with their adolescent. At three and 9 months post-baseline, adolescents in the experimental and control groups completed follow-up surveys administered by data collectors.

To examine group differences in parent-adolescent communication variables, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression was used. To ensure baseline equivalence between the two arms of the RCT, demographic and outcome variables were compared at baseline between the intervention and control groups. In order to assess the generalizability of results across traditional and robust methods of analysis, all analyses were repeated with bootstrapping. Additionally, outlier and specification-error for each analysis was conducted.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

634

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Self-identify as Latino
  • At least one a parent present in home, defined as a biological or non-biological primary caregiver
  • Resident of target geographic community (Willacy, Starr, Hidalgo, or Cameron) in the Rio Grande Valley

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identify as non-Latino
  • Lack of parent or caregiver in home during recruitment
  • Resident of non-target community in the Rio Grande Valley

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Received Families Talking Together (FTT) intervention, an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes in adolescents age 10-14. The FTT intervention consisted of two components. Component 1 was comprised of 2 FTT intervention sessions between a parent and bilingual/bicultural promotor trained to deliver FTT in English or Spanish. These sessions highlighted adverse health consequences of sex to motivate parents to communicate with their adolescent and provided guidance to parents on communication strategies. Component 2 was comprised of written supplemental materials that promotores used to guide each intervention session. Experimental condition families will complete all measurement assessments.
FTT is an evidence-based program designed to increase parent-adolescent communication about sex in order to delay sexual debut and prevent negative SRH outcomes in young adolescents (aged 10 to 14). The FTT intervention has been delivered with efficacy in multiple settings, including schools and clinics (Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011a; Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2011b).
No Intervention: Control
Parents randomized to the control group did not receive any intervention sessions and only completed assessment questionnaires.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication about Sex and Contraception
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-baseline
Report of parent-adolescent communication about delay of sex and contraceptive use
3 and 9 months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication about HIV/STDs
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-baseline
Report of parent-adolescent communication about HIV/STIs
3 and 9 months post-baseline
Change in Sexual Risk Behaviors
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-baseline
Report of decrease in frequency of sex and/or increased condom use
3 and 9 months post-baseline
Change in Health Care Insurance Enrollment
Time Frame: 3 and 9 months post-baseline
Report of health care insurance enrollment among Latino families
3 and 9 months post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gillian Sealy, PhD, Power to Decide, The National Campaign to Prevent Unplanned Pregnancy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sexual Risk Behavior

Clinical Trials on Families Talking Together (FTT)

3
Subscribe