The Utility and Feasibility of Accessible Diarrhea Etiology Prediction Tool (ADEPT) in an Informal Healthcare Setting

April 13, 2026 updated by: Daniel Leung

A Mobile Health Tool to Improve Antibiotics Stewardship Among Village Doctors in Bangladesh

Diarrheal disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for children under 5 globally. Accepted best practice for managing diarrhea in the absence of blood or suspicion of cholera is rehydration, however in resource poor areas antibiotics are still prescribed at high rates due to pressures such as financial incentives, caregiver expectations, and diagnostic uncertainty. Informal healthcare providers often serve as first point of care for pediatric diarrhea patients in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) and commonly prescribe antibiotics for pediatric diarrhea at high frequencies.

In this pilot before-after feasibility trial informally trained healthcare providers will use a mobile phone-based application (Accessible Diarrhea Etiology Prediction Tool, ADEPT) which will allow for the exploration of the acceptability, feasibility, and utility of the tool, as well as ADEPTs ability to decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing practices.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diarrheal diseases remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide, accounting for around 500,000 deaths in children under 5 annually. Generally, the management of diarrheal disease relies on rehydration, although other management decisions such as laboratory testing and medication may alter outcome. However, in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where the burden of diarrheal disease is highest, treatment is largely empiric due to high caseloads and lack of accessible and affordable diagnostics. Despite World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, antibiotics are often overused in management of diarrheal disease leading to adverse side effects and antimicrobial resistance. Meanwhile underuse of antibiotics may result in prolonged illness and increased transmission rates. In resource poor areas with limited access to diagnostics antibiotic overuse is common, especially when prescribed by untrained allopathic providers. Accurate and timely determination of etiology is essential to reduce unnecessary diagnostic and antibiotic use. Clinical prediction rules (CPRs), often in the form of electronic clinical decision-making support tools (eCDSTs), are used to help clinicians make evidence-based decisions with improved patient outcomes. Informally trained allopathic providers, known as Village Doctors (VDs) in Bangladesh, often function as the first point of care for pediatric diarrhea patients. VDs are immensely popular due to enhanced accessibility and familiarity; a recent study in rural Bangladesh found that VDs act as first point of care for up to 65% of patients. VDs and other informally trained practitioners prescribe antibiotics for pediatric diarrhea at rates far exceeding formally trained providers and far beyond what is clinically indicated.

The reliance on VDs, especially in resource poor settings, and their prescribing practices suggests that antimicrobial stewardship efforts should include VDs. A previous study by the investigators has shown that an eCDST based on etiologic prediction rules and WHO guidelines was successful in reducing antibiotics prescribed by formally trained providers by over 50%. Our investigation will seek to understand if an eCDST (the Accessible Diarrhea Etiology Prediction Tool (ADEPT)) could be used to guide antibiotic prescriptions by informally trained healthcare providers like VDs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Village Doctor with antibiotic prescribing authority for children presenting with diarrheal illness
  • Practice in trial location subdistrict
  • Self-report treating a minimum of 5 pediatric diarrhea cases per week
  • Willing to participate in ADEPT training, use ADEPT in clinical practice with pediatric diarrhea patients, and to collect, via an electronic tool, data on patient characteristics and clinical management

Exclusion Criteria:

- Planning to leave study site prior to completion of study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Diarrheal assessment with ADEPT, mobile phone tool
The ADEPT tool allows providers to input information about pediatric diarrhea patients and provides outputs related to dehydration management and potential treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of pediatric diarrhea encounters resulting in antibiotic prescription
Time Frame: 6 weeks
By self-report, before vs after ADEPT implementation
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision Support Systems, Clinical

Subscribe