Cognitive Function and Affective Regulation in Meditators (CALM)

April 16, 2026 updated by: Balachundhar Subramaniam
This is a prospective cohort study with 52 meditators and 52 controls. These groups will be contacted at a singular timepoint, during which they will take surveys and cognitive tests, which will be used to assess cognitive and emotional outcomes. The meditator group will be recruited from a pool of healthy individuals who have learned meditation practices such as those taught by the Isha Foundation (e.g., Shambhavi Mahamudra Kriya, Shoonya, Samyama breath-watching, etc.) Meditation-naïve individuals will be recruited into the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

This is a prospective cohort study with 52 meditators and 52 controls. These groups will be contacted at a singular timepoint, during which they will take surveys and cognitive tests, which will be used to assess cognitive and emotional outcomes. The meditator group will be recruited from a pool of healthy individuals who have learned meditation practices such as those taught by the Isha Foundation (e.g., Shambhavi Mahamudra Kriya, Shoonya, Samyama breath-watching, etc.) Meditation-naïve individuals will be recruited into the control group. Despite allocation to 2 separate cohorts, both groups will be subjected to identical questionnaires and tasks at the singular timepoint. Further, none of the above practices are being taught by the study team. Rather, the investigators are only looking to study the effects of the aforementioned practices on participants through validated survey questionnaires and cognitive tasks.

Study Procedure: Following e-consent and enrollment into the study, participants are asked to complete electronic surveys and cognitive tasks. These will either be completed virtually on the participants' own device or on a BIDMC-approved device brought to the participant by the study team. (Further details on the remote administration of surveys and cognitive tasks explained below)

Questionnaire: The following questionnaires are incorporated into the study and will be administered to the study participants at a single timepoint.

Demographic, medical history, past meditation experience, and habits: Collects demographic details (age, ethnicity, gender, education/employment, marital status, number of children, country of residence), meditation exposure and duration of practice, past cognitive training, alcohol use, and smoking.

Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ): This survey aims to collect information on a person's thoughts after having experienced a negative event.

Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Comprises two mood scales measuring positive affect and negative affect. Participants respond to a 20-item test using a 5-point scale that ranges from very slightly or not at all (1) to extremely (5). Scores can range from 10-50 for both the Positive and Negative affect with lower scores representing lower levels of affect and higher scores representing higher levels of affect.

Four-Item Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-4) for Anxiety & Depression: Assesses anxiety and depression. Scores range from 0-12 with subscales for anxiety (items 1-2) and depression (items 3-4); scores greater than 3 on each subscale are considered positive.

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): 10-question validated instrument that assesses stress. Participants are asked to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often) how often they agree with various statements. Items from each of the 10 questions are then summed to create a total perceived stress score. Please see the survey details in the attached "Study Questionnaire" attachment.

Cognitive Tasks: Participants will be asked to complete a set of cognitive tasks to assess executive function, attention, memory, and affect regulation. The tasks would require participants to respond in a specific manner to certain stimuli based on the instructions appearing on the screen. The tasks may also contain images with positive or negative emotional content. Some examples of the tasks that may be used in this study are provided below.

Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT): Participants are presented with a sequence of three numbers in each trial and are asked to identify and press the key corresponding to the number that is not repeated. In "congruent" trials, the target number appears in the spot corresponding to its value and is flanked by zeros (e.g., "0 2 0"). In "incongruent" trials, the target number is in a spot that does not correspond to its value and is flanked by a non-zero digit (e.g., "3 3 2"). Images with positive, negative, or neutral emotional content are presented simultaneously with the number sequences to test emotional regulation.

N-back Task: Participants are presented with a sequence of letters. Participants are given two keys they can respond with. They are asked to press one key if the current letter is the same as the letter that was presented n letters back, and press the other key if the current letter does not match the letter that was presented n letters back.

These cognitive tasks will be either administered remotely through a secure online cognitive task hosting platform such as Pavlovia (pavlovia.org). Participants will be provided the link to the task on the online platform, and will only be asked to enter their de-identified study ID (e.g., CALM01, CALM02). This link will be unique to the study and will be generated and sent to participants once they enroll in the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Recruiting
        • BIDMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects will not be recruited based on race, ethnicity, or gender. However, it is not clear whether the final study sample will contain a representative spread of the racial and gender makeup. There is no reason to exclude pregnant women from this protocol.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be able to read and understand English.
  • Meditators: Participants must regularly practice meditation (4 or more times per week).
  • Controls: Participants must not regularly practice meditation (4 or more times per week)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below the age of 18.
  • Participants not living in the US.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Meditators
Participants who regularly practice meditation (4 or more times per week)
Controls
Participants who do not regularly practice meditation (4 or more times per week)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT)
Time Frame: within one week of consent
Participants are presented with a sequence of three numbers in each trial and are asked to identify and press the key corresponding to the number that is not repeated. In "congruent" trials, the target number appears in the spot corresponding to its value and is flanked by zeros (e.g., "0 2 0"). In "incongruent" trials, the target number is in a spot that does not correspond to its value and is flanked by a non-zero digit (e.g., "3 3 2"). Images with positive, negative, or neutral emotional content are presented simultaneously with the number sequences to test emotional regulation.
within one week of consent
N-back Task
Time Frame: within one week of consent
Participants are presented with a sequence of letters. Participants are given two keys they can respond with. They are asked to press one key if the current letter is the same as the letter that was presented n letters back, and press the other key if the current letter does not match the letter that was presented n letters back.
within one week of consent

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)
Time Frame: within one week of consent
This survey aims to collect information on a person's thoughts after having experienced a negative event. Comprised of 36-items, with scores from 1 (never) to 5 (always), total subscale scores range from 4 to 20. Higher subscale scores indicate increased frequency of use for the specified regulation strategy.
within one week of consent
Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: within one week of consent
Comprises two mood scales measuring positive affect and negative affect. Participants respond to a 20-item test using a 5-point scale that ranges from very slightly or not at all (1) to extremely (5). Total sScores can range from 10-50 for both the Positive and Negative affect with lower scores representing lower levels of affect and higher scores representing higher levels of affect.
within one week of consent
Four-Item Patient Health Questionnaires (PHQ-4) for Anxiety & Depression
Time Frame: within one week of consent
Total scores range from 0-12 with subscales for anxiety (items 1-2) and depression (items 3-4); scores greater than 3 on each subscale are considered positive. Higher scores indicate increased anxiety/depression symptoms.
within one week of consent
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: within one week of consent
10-question validated instrument that assesses stress. Participants are asked to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (very often) how often they agree with various statements. Items from each of the 10 questions are then summed to create a total perceived stress score, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate a higher level or perceived stress.
within one week of consent

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023P000588

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Function and Affective Regulation

Subscribe