Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Study To Assess The Reproducibility And Sensitivity Of Quantitative Sensory Testing In Patients With Neuropathic Pain

11. dubna 2019 aktualizováno: Pfizer

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, 2-Way Crossover Methodology Study Designed To Assess The Reproducibility And Sensitivity Of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) In Patients With Neuropathic Pain Treated With Pregabalin Vs Placebo

Conventional pain efficacy measures such as Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) are often unable to detect treatment efficacy in small-scale clinical trials. Combining conventional pain efficacy measures with quantitative sensory testing (QST) may provide more sensitive and informative outcome measures in clinical trials.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Dokončeno

Podmínky

Intervence / Léčba

Detailní popis

Methodology to assess reproducibility and sensitivity of quantitative sensory testing

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Aktuální)

31

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

  • Belgie
      • Bruxelles, Belgie, 1070
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Francie
      • Boulogne Billancourt, Francie, 92100
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Rakousko
      • Vienna, Rakousko, A-1090
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Spojené království
      • Liverpool, Spojené království, L9 7AL
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • London, Spojené království, SW10 9NH
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

18 let a starší (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu

Všechno

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain of peripheral origin demonstrating spontaneous ongoing pain and dynamic mechanical allodynia to brush stimuli.
  • A present pain intensity score of 4 or more (out of 10) for spontaneous ongoing pain and brush-evoked allodynia at the skin area at screen.
  • Stable analgesic medication (excluding pregabalin) for a minimum of 1 month prior to the start of study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy.
  • Patients who have trigeminal neuralgia, central pain (due to cerebrovascular lesions, multiple sclerosis and traumatic spinal cord injuries), complex regional pain syndrome (Type I and II), and phantom limb pain.
  • Patients who have previously been treated with pregabalin.

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Jiný
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Crossover Assignment
  • Maskování: Dvojnásobek

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Komparátor placeba: Placebo
Lék: Placebo
BID dosing for 28 days
Aktivní komparátor: Aktivní lék
Lék: Pregabalin
Dose titration according to following regimen: 75mg BID for 3 days; 150mg for 4 days; 225mg BID for 4 days; 300mg BID for 17 days. Dose reduced for renally impaired patients

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Mean Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia Intensity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Five strokes applied with a standardized brush (somedic) across the painful site, 6cm long and at a control site to allow the participants to appreciate any difference. A painful and clearly dysaesthetic (unpleasant) sensation was considered as representing brush allodynia (whereas a "strange" or "tickly" sensation provoked by the brush was not). After each brush stimuli participants were asked to give a pain rating using 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 5 brush strokes was calculated to obtain the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia Area at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Dynamic area brush in cm^2: calculated from 8 measured distances by calculating the area of an octagon. The angle between each pair of lines was 45 degrees at point c. The area of the octagon was found by totaling the areas of the 8 triangles. Octagon with 8 radial lengths from center to the outside. Area = Σ ( ½ length * perpendicular height); Σ ( ½ ri * sin(45) r(i+1) ) = Σ ( (ri * r(i+1) )/2√2)). (where ri, i=1 to 8, were the eight radial lengths)
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (Von Frey) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Sensitivity to mechanical pain stimuli was tested using calibrated Von Frey monofilaments. To obtain a stimulus-response-function, seven different Von Frey monofilaments (size 8 to 512 mN, force increased by a factor of two from filament to filament) applied three times each; each stimulus was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. If a score of 8 or more was reported for a given intensity no stronger stimuli was applied. Von Frey stimulus was applied to the skin for 1 to 2 seconds. The average of 3 ratings was calculated for the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Punctate Allodynia Area (Von Frey) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Punctate allodynia area in cm^2: calculated from 8 measured distances by calculating the area of an octagon. The angle between each pair of lines was 45 degrees at point c. The area of the octagon was found by totaling the areas of the 8 triangles. Octagon with 8 radial lengths from center to the outside. Area = Σ ( ½ length * perpendicular height); Σ ( ½ ri * sin(45) r(i+1) ) = Σ ( (ri * r(i+1) )/2√2)). (where ri, i=1 to 8, were the eight radial lengths)
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Pain Sensitivity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Duration of thermal stimuli was 2 seconds and an intensity that is increased in steps of 5 degrees celsius for cold stimuli (between 5 and 20 degrees celsius). Thermal pain sensitivity was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 2 ratings was calculated to get the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Sensitivity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Duration of thermal stimuli was 2 seconds and an intensity that is increased in steps of 4 degrees celsius for heat stimuli (between 40 and 50 degrees celsius). Thermal pain sensitivity was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 2 ratings was calculated to get the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Pain Score From the Daily Diary at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Daily pain diary: participant-rated pain during the past 24 hours rated on an 11 point NRS scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. For a given week, the pain response was the average of the 7 daily entries for that week, or average of the available data for that week if fewer than 7 entries were recorded (>=1 daily pain score for any given week required). The endpoint for each week consisted of the change from baseline in average pain score (follow-up value minus baseline).
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
PGIC: participant-rated assessment measuring change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale from 1=very much improved to 7=very much worse.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Test-Day Global Pain Intensity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Global pain: participant-rated pain using the test-day global pain scale, consisting of an 11-point NRS where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Participants described intensity of pain in response to "How intense is your pain today?"
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score at Visits 4 and 7
Časové okno: Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
NPSI: 10-item self-administered questionnaire assessing 5 dimensions of pain (burning superficial spontaneous pain, pressing deep spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia). Each item consists of a question about the specific qualities of pain and an 11-point numerical scale range: 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity imaginable), and 2 temporal items related to spontaneous and paroxysmal pain. Maximum total score possible = 100.
Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Sponzor

Pfizer

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Užitečné odkazy

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia

1. prosince 2006

Primární dokončení (Aktuální)

1. září 2009

Dokončení studie (Aktuální)

1. září 2009

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

4. května 2010

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

4. května 2010

První zveřejněno (Odhad)

5. května 2010

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

23. dubna 2019

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

11. dubna 2019

Naposledy ověřeno

1. dubna 2019

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Klíčová slova

Další relevantní podmínky MeSH

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • A9011015

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Klinické studie na Neuropatická bolest

Prohledejte podobné pokusy

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

Podmínky

Vzácné nemoci

Drogové intervence

Doplňky stravy

Sponzor / Spolupracovníci

Místa

3
Předplatit