Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Study To Assess The Reproducibility And Sensitivity Of Quantitative Sensory Testing In Patients With Neuropathic Pain

11 april 2019 uppdaterad av: Pfizer

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, 2-Way Crossover Methodology Study Designed To Assess The Reproducibility And Sensitivity Of Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) In Patients With Neuropathic Pain Treated With Pregabalin Vs Placebo

Conventional pain efficacy measures such as Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) are often unable to detect treatment efficacy in small-scale clinical trials. Combining conventional pain efficacy measures with quantitative sensory testing (QST) may provide more sensitive and informative outcome measures in clinical trials.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Methodology to assess reproducibility and sensitivity of quantitative sensory testing

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

31

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

  • Belgien
      • Bruxelles, Belgien, 1070
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Frankrike
      • Boulogne Billancourt, Frankrike, 92100
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Storbritannien
      • Liverpool, Storbritannien, L9 7AL
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • London, Storbritannien, SW10 9NH
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Österrike
      • Vienna, Österrike, A-1090
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain of peripheral origin demonstrating spontaneous ongoing pain and dynamic mechanical allodynia to brush stimuli.
  • A present pain intensity score of 4 or more (out of 10) for spontaneous ongoing pain and brush-evoked allodynia at the skin area at screen.
  • Stable analgesic medication (excluding pregabalin) for a minimum of 1 month prior to the start of study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone neurolytic or neurosurgical therapy.
  • Patients who have trigeminal neuralgia, central pain (due to cerebrovascular lesions, multiple sclerosis and traumatic spinal cord injuries), complex regional pain syndrome (Type I and II), and phantom limb pain.
  • Patients who have previously been treated with pregabalin.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Övrig
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Crossover tilldelning
  • Maskning: Dubbel

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Placebo-jämförare: Placebo
Läkemedel: Placebo
BID dosing for 28 days
Aktiv komparator: Aktivt läkemedel
Läkemedel: Pregabalin
Dose titration according to following regimen: 75mg BID for 3 days; 150mg for 4 days; 225mg BID for 4 days; 300mg BID for 17 days. Dose reduced for renally impaired patients

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Mean Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia Intensity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Five strokes applied with a standardized brush (somedic) across the painful site, 6cm long and at a control site to allow the participants to appreciate any difference. A painful and clearly dysaesthetic (unpleasant) sensation was considered as representing brush allodynia (whereas a "strange" or "tickly" sensation provoked by the brush was not). After each brush stimuli participants were asked to give a pain rating using 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 5 brush strokes was calculated to obtain the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia Area at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Dynamic area brush in cm^2: calculated from 8 measured distances by calculating the area of an octagon. The angle between each pair of lines was 45 degrees at point c. The area of the octagon was found by totaling the areas of the 8 triangles. Octagon with 8 radial lengths from center to the outside. Area = Σ ( ½ length * perpendicular height); Σ ( ½ ri * sin(45) r(i+1) ) = Σ ( (ri * r(i+1) )/2√2)). (where ri, i=1 to 8, were the eight radial lengths)
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Mechanical Pain Sensitivity (Von Frey) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Sensitivity to mechanical pain stimuli was tested using calibrated Von Frey monofilaments. To obtain a stimulus-response-function, seven different Von Frey monofilaments (size 8 to 512 mN, force increased by a factor of two from filament to filament) applied three times each; each stimulus was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. If a score of 8 or more was reported for a given intensity no stronger stimuli was applied. Von Frey stimulus was applied to the skin for 1 to 2 seconds. The average of 3 ratings was calculated for the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Punctate Allodynia Area (Von Frey) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Punctate allodynia area in cm^2: calculated from 8 measured distances by calculating the area of an octagon. The angle between each pair of lines was 45 degrees at point c. The area of the octagon was found by totaling the areas of the 8 triangles. Octagon with 8 radial lengths from center to the outside. Area = Σ ( ½ length * perpendicular height); Σ ( ½ ri * sin(45) r(i+1) ) = Σ ( (ri * r(i+1) )/2√2)). (where ri, i=1 to 8, were the eight radial lengths)
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Cold Pain Sensitivity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Duration of thermal stimuli was 2 seconds and an intensity that is increased in steps of 5 degrees celsius for cold stimuli (between 5 and 20 degrees celsius). Thermal pain sensitivity was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 2 ratings was calculated to get the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Heat Pain Sensitivity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Duration of thermal stimuli was 2 seconds and an intensity that is increased in steps of 4 degrees celsius for heat stimuli (between 40 and 50 degrees celsius). Thermal pain sensitivity was participant-rated using 11-point NRS where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable. The average of 2 ratings was calculated to get the mean score.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Mean Change From Baseline in Weekly Pain Score From the Daily Diary at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Daily pain diary: participant-rated pain during the past 24 hours rated on an 11 point NRS scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. For a given week, the pain response was the average of the 7 daily entries for that week, or average of the available data for that week if fewer than 7 entries were recorded (>=1 daily pain score for any given week required). The endpoint for each week consisted of the change from baseline in average pain score (follow-up value minus baseline).
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
PGIC: participant-rated assessment measuring change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale from 1=very much improved to 7=very much worse.
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Test-Day Global Pain Intensity at Visits 3 and 6 and Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Global pain: participant-rated pain using the test-day global pain scale, consisting of an 11-point NRS where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Participants described intensity of pain in response to "How intense is your pain today?"
Week 3 (Visits 3 and 6) and Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
Mean Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Score at Visits 4 and 7
Tidsram: Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period
NPSI: 10-item self-administered questionnaire assessing 5 dimensions of pain (burning superficial spontaneous pain, pressing deep spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dysesthesia). Each item consists of a question about the specific qualities of pain and an 11-point numerical scale range: 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity imaginable), and 2 temporal items related to spontaneous and paroxysmal pain. Maximum total score possible = 100.
Week 4 (Visits 4 and 7) of each period

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Pfizer

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Användbara länkar

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 december 2006

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 september 2009

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 september 2009

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

4 maj 2010

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

4 maj 2010

Första postat (Uppskatta)

5 maj 2010

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

23 april 2019

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

11 april 2019

Senast verifierad

1 april 2019

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Nyckelord

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • A9011015

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Kliniska prövningar på Neuropatisk smärta

Kliniska prövningar på Pregabalin

Sök liknande försök

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Australia

Betingelser

Sällsynta sjukdomar

Läkemedelsinterventioner

Kosttillskott

Sponsor / medarbetare

Platser

3
Prenumerera