Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Improving the Quality of Patient Care by Using a Clinical Expert System. (CLEOS)

15. november 2015 opdateret af: Dominik M. Alscher, MD, Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH

Quality Assessment for History Taking With or Without an Knowledge Based Interview System.

Aim:

To investigate the quality of history taking by physician and computer-based system.

Patients:

100 inpatients presenting at the RBK for the first time and treated in the departments of nephrology and cardiology.

Methods:

The information obtained by the computer based system is compared with the information acquired by conventional history taking. Study endpoint is the comparison of historical data organized according to the elements in a standard medical history on a patient-by-patient basis.

Study procedure History taking is performed by physicians according to the guidelines of the RBK. Within 2 days thereafter the patient is interviewed with help of the CLEOS system with the support of a study nurse.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Aim:

To compare the completeness of history taking by physicians and by a computerized system interacting directly with the patients. Historical data recorded in the patient record, including the discharge letter, were compared with the history acquired by computer-based interview of each patient.

Patients:

100 inpatients presenting at the RBK for the first time and treated in the departments of nephrology and cardiology.

Methods:

The information obtained by the computer based system is compared with the information acquired by conventional history taking. Study endpoint is the comparison of historical data organized according to the elements in a standard medical history on a patient-by-patient basis.

Study procedure After informed consent of the patients the procedure of history taking is performed by the physician according to the guidelines of the RBK. Within 2 days thereafter the patient is interviewed with help of the CLEOS system [a computer-based, history-taking program] with the support of a study nurse. The physician will be informed about the results immediately after completion of the questionnaire.

Data of medical significance were extracted from the official hospital chart and the computerized history by clinically experienced physicians and tabulated on a patient-by-patient basis. data elements were compared across each category of the history for each patient interviewed. The relevance of the differences of the information obtained by the two systems was rated by an independent reviewer.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

98

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Stuttgart, Tyskland, 70376
        • Robert-Bosch-Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All inpatients in a hospital environment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give an informed consent

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Andet: Inpatients of hospital

All patients who were admitted to the departments of nephrology or cardiology in a tertiary hospital in Germany.

The intervention was use of an expert system to acquire medical histories by direct interview of patients.

Description of the software program - The program tested in this study consisted of a data acquisition [history-taking] component and a data analysis component. The data acquisition component was constructed on the basis of established principles of pathophysiology. Medical knowledge was formalized as software algorithms that were machine-readable by representing the knowledge as branched chain decision trees.

Methods The intervention was use of an expert system to acquire medical histories by direct interview of patients.

Description of the software program - The program tested in this study consisted of a data acquisition [history-taking] component and a data analysis component. The data acquisition component was constructed on the basis of established principles of pathophysiology. Medical knowledge was formalized as software algorithms that were machine-readable by representing the knowledge as branched chain decision trees.

Andre navne:
  • CLEOS
Convential history taking by physicians
Andre navne:
  • Traditional history taking

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Detection of Medical Problems (by Number of Problems Reported by Computer Assisted History, That Were Not Reported by Physician Taken History)
Tidsramme: participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 8 days
Data were extracted from hospital charts by to experienced physicians.; data from the computer histories were extracted by a senior physician, who tabulated comparisons between the 2 sets of records. We used the number of problems reported by Computer Assisted History that were not reported by Physician. Nurses at Robert Bosch Krankenhaus do not take medical histories in regard to allergies or adverse drug reactions. Pharmacists make no entries into charts and have no separate records of drug allergies or history of adverse drug reactions. Data on these issues either are obtained only by physician interview of the patient.
participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 8 days

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Efterforskere

  • Ledende efterforsker: Dominik M Alscher, MD, Robert Bosch Gesellschaft für Medizinische Forschung mbH

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. august 2005

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. december 2008

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. december 2008

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

31. januar 2007

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

31. januar 2007

Først opslået (Skøn)

2. februar 2007

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

18. december 2015

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

15. november 2015

Sidst verificeret

1. november 2015

Mere information

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Forhøjet blodtryk

Kliniske forsøg med Computer-assisted history

Abonner